EPTThree Kingdoms Mafia (三国演义) - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
"1. Voting is done in a separate thread, to be created once the game starts." ???? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
I am therefore going to vote for L, who will then probably lynch me this will work out for the best for everyone. thank you, bill | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
"This strikes me as a Leaderish sort of talk. Why you ask?" I'll tell you why. Because he is the yellow turban leader, and is fishing to see if Radfield is potentially on his side without him dying (yellow turbans obviously can't recruit leaders). Radfield gives him the advantage in two ways: 1) he is currently swaying the army voting and has power 2) he is a smart, good, solid player who would be a practical addition to BloodyC0bbler's turbans. L has been quiet, and really not posting as much (wanting to stay out of the fray) until I mentioned his name at all. I am surprised people are not donating their armies to a veteran, and are donating to a "new" player "who has played well in the past" in Radfield, who is my 3rd suspect in reasons I will be giving after this is finished on L. L may just be busy living it up (as it's a great time of year), and we can hold him accountable if he doesn't "come out of his blue shell". I would suggest him as a secondary target for "who is a faction leader we need to kill" He is likely Cao Cao in my opinion. Radfield is a little harder to pin, and my reasoning is because of the past success of "good, new players" in getting roles. I gave Korynne a spot in the mafia in my LAMM, and citi.zen has been elected to become mafia in a few games since his success. Hell, flamewheel even let me have a shot. What I'm getting at is Radfield could potentially be Sun Quan or Liu Bei (though I kind of doubt it). Trust me on this one, BloodyC0bbler would be a good lynch for us in terms of balancing the game and lowering the skill ceiling for us relatively noob players. He is most definitely a power role, and is the player I would deem "most likely to be leading the yellow turbans" based NOT ONLY upon his being a good player who is favored but ALSO upon his posting fishing for information out of Radfield. Whoever is elected, I implore you to consider lynching BC. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
the wording BC used in talking to radfield is a dead giveaway of him fishing for information on leaders the main reason we need worry that he could be doing that is because he is the yellow turban leader i will admit that it is a necessity for people to do that from every player slot. it would also be in your benefit to lie, L, about the method he used to pick. based upon my character, though, i can GUARANTEE he handpicked roles. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
i have been getting pms, so as that is legal, feel free to pm me i will reply when i have more time and have refreshed up on my knowledge of the topics being discussed | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On May 19 2010 05:16 Abenson wrote: Announcement: I don't care about anything right now. and so should you (not care) Why? We are not really part of any clan/army right now, and therefore there is no point to us trying to do anything at all. Eliminating the Yellows sounds like a good plan, but it doesn't really benefit us. We, as regular townies, don't care about the politics right now Therefore I will simply un-vote and watch what happens (and occasionally spam) lol, owned On May 19 2010 06:08 Hesmyrr wrote: Okay, guys. This is critical. The fact you don't even know which side you are working for - and I promise you nobody but YT will inform the "victim" of their target - is highly disadvantageous for us neutrals. Hell, you may be playing game as usual when BAM! faction leader being an idiot gets himself killed, and who suffers for it? Us! Do you want to suffer such ignominy? I tell you not! Eighteen other neutrals listening to my voice, ponder my speech. I will tell you of an way out. We will rebel against the injustice and wrestle control of the game out of these so-called leader's grasps. I propose... NEUTRAL REVOLUTION Take note of the winning condition Caller has listed: You know what this means? Even when there is one faction leader remaining, as long as he doesn't overwhelm us, he can't win. Let's pull a Battler and turn around the chessboard. What do you see? I see a four cult game, with us neutrals as Townies. Let me stress that. OUR PRIORITY AS NEUTRALS IS TO HUNT DOWN THE FOUR FACTION LEADERS, AND KILL THEM ALL. THEN IT WILL BE "TOWN" VICTORY, SINCE NEUTRALS (TOWN) IS THE ONLY FACTION REMAINING. This plan is beneficial for all of us, this is the plan that makes sense, and this is EXACTLY what we should be doing. Neutrals, we are no longer neutrals. We are now comrades fighting for mutual victory, struggling against the tyranny of the cults awaiting us. Hereby I dedicate myself into finding, and killing, all the leader in this game. Who agrees with me?!?!? Very good post, Hes. I will be voting for you if I'm alive unless something changes. On May 19 2010 06:32 BrownBear wrote: I see it as less of a four-cult game, and more of a two-stage game, since one cult is obviously much more powerful than the other three. I completely agree with Brownbear here. We definitely would benefit from eliminating the yellow turbans early. On May 19 2010 07:53 L wrote: Are people intentionally being idiots? Does a bear shit in the woods? I would like to stress that BloodyC0bbler is a great target to be the yellow turban leader. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
there are probably 4 faction leaders, so I am assuming at least 3 of them can give armies. Unless I am missing something, L has yet to give his armies to anyone or keep them for himself. Could it possibly be that he CAN'T? Perhaps that's a flaw, besides the one of them all dying when they try to recruit Cao Cao, of being the yellow turban leader. Since they get the advantage of not being able to be recruited, they need something to counter-balance it a bit more. Perhaps it's that their armies are automatically donated for the yellow turban cause. This could explain why L has yet to donate his armies: He is the yellow turban leader. Unless he clarifies his position on this, or donates his army, I will be very suspicious of him | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
 | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:21 Fishball wrote: I don't feel like pulling the reading comprehension card again from Mini Mafia-1... Read again, I never said "I don't want". I didn't understand your wording, which is why I asked On May 20 2010 05:22 Tricode wrote: I some how doubt that, but I don't care really. I'm just gonna go along with the ride until the game solidifies more and contribute as best as I can to me winning or w/e faction I'm in by force. No, dude, you're good. You weren't even being discussed, really, and then you came out with a good post that you didn't even need to do to survive. If someone picked you to lynch it would be a party foul now. The fact that you're being actively lurking combined with a willingness to post when called out turns you from looking like a mafia member to looking like (and no offense here) a noob town player who is trying to soak in how to play properly. If you're wanting to play properly in the style you seem to be taking on for yourself, watch how L plays. You yourself admitted you didn't want to do much in this day 1. Another good person to see is foolishness when he's mafia. He might not post at all on day 1 really. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:24 L wrote: You realized he made a big post to say "I've been inactive, but I'm also going to be inactive in the future" and you're taking that as a sign that he's active? ... ok. his opinion of inactiveness i took to mean actively lurking | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:33 Fishball wrote: Ok, so I didn't quote your entire line, so just reply exactly to what I quoted, great. You already made a conclusion in your head by saying you were disappointed at me. Your question afterwards isn't exactly a question. If you were to word your statement as a question, you should have said, "Don't you want a victory for the neutrals? If not, I would be disappointed in you." Not the other way around. MY saying "IM DISSAPOINTED IN YOU" is because in the past 2 pages you've been a crybaby asking for a modkill. My disappointment is not from the fact that you're not seeking an unlikely win condition. Sorry that you inferred incorrectly. That's why I ask questions. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
| ||
