TL Mafia XXII

Welcome to TL Mafia XX!

Your role is: Mafia

Your team consists of:

1. Ver
2. Qatol
3. Chuiu

PM flamewheel91 if you have any questions about your role.

On April 15 2010 17:51 meeple wrote:


Nah... I don't think that thread gets bumped if someone posts in it... dunno if its because it's stickied or not.

On April 18 2010 20:42 Ace wrote:


Actually I wasn't even talking about the newbies. But if you want to be included in that list it's fine by me.

On April 19 2010 09:00 Roffles wrote:
Yeah, just gonna chime in a little here. I disagree on lynching an inactive. I'd rather gamble and kill off someone suspicious than take a guess at an inactive. As someone earlier mentioned, if people are inactive, then as the game drags on, people aren't going to take their word at all. Why not just gamble now and take a shot at someone who seems suspicious now? Go big or go home.

On April 20 2010 12:00 Jugan wrote:


Nah man, when you insult someone, you have to be ready to accept an insult back. I'm sorry some people couldn't handle some "shady" insults, I just figured it was better some things other people are saying:

"Okay basically you're going around sucking peoples dicks"
or
"Fuck all of you. You are all noobs."
or
"This game is shit. lets watch one piece"

If me calling you a donkey truly hurt your feelings then I'm sorry for calling you a donkey. I just felt you were completely ignorant to events that transgressed and I sought to rectify it. I didn't call you a donkey to make my dick feel bigger, I called you a donkey because I felt you were acting like one. I doubt ANYONE complained about me, and if someone actually did, I apologize to them. However, they could have told me directly if they had a problem with me.

I personally think that flamewheel is just trying to shape the game into something HE thinks is fun, when he is in fact ruining a lot of the fun aspects of it (especially being too lazy to start the game off with clues). It's just sad he's making me into the scapegoat, but that's okay, my posting has been a bit abrasive.

On April 18 2010 08:52 Jugan wrote:
I just wanna say i got the role that i usually am guys. i wanna see the clues already :O so bored

On April 18 2010 11:08 Jugan wrote:
i say we lynch the KF91 guy. he's annoying.

On April 19 2010 07:18 Jugan wrote:

why not make it 4 or 5. or even 6 or 7. or maybe 3... 3 days!

On April 19 2010 10:13 Jugan wrote:


I think it's just two big egos duking it out. The power of the E-PENIS!

note: this post went up while I was crafting my previous one.

On April 19 2010 10:58 Jugan wrote:
except that one of them was in a response to a post that was made while I was crafting my original post.

Which I might add I NOTED in that post. GG.

On April 19 2010 12:02 Jugan wrote:


yay <3 incognito.

I think the plan should be to lynch that KF91 guy.

On April 19 2010 12:09 Jugan wrote:


reason: I don't like him, and he hates goats.

On April 19 2010 12:36 Jugan wrote:


My vote is as series as it gets, mate.

On April 19 2010 13:27 Jugan wrote:


Incorrect. Go read again, sir. Frankly, I'm disappointed in your analysis. Additionally, a lot of the people you say "posts 1 liners" in fact offer insight and analysis that you either failed to read or are blatantly ignoring it in order to try and bolster your "point". I think the best course of action would be to lynch YOU as you are trying to get people to support your idea through false information and/or faulty logic.

On April 21 2010 19:42 Korynne wrote:
Well he just seemed fishy when I first started reading the thread.He seemed readable, whereas people like Ace really confuse me. >.<

I was just doing analysis, didn't know what I would come up with as I went along, and I made my conclusion at the end. I didn't analyze anyone that I did not write about. Sure, if I knew ahead of time then I might not do an analysis on Protoss, but he seemed manageable when I was reading so I'm just trying my best to contribute. I definitely will be watching him, but I think if he's the last mafia left there really isn't much harm and we could take him out easily, whereas someone with more experience would be more scary. So given that I don't have much against protoss and he doesn't seem like a great player, my final conclusion is just to keep an eye on him and focus on bigger threats.

Like I said, I'm new at this, so if someone else manages to find something real on protoss after I brought him to everyone's attention then I've managed to contribute my part.

Do you know already who you wish to lynch tomorrow Scara? I personally don't. But I see kind of two lines of people in focus right now, Caller/Ace/etc. and BC/RoL/etc. So I think it'll be reasonably likely that we can find someone suspicious tied to both of those camps, and therefore a double lynch would speed things up a little in terms of what information we would have regarding those two camps.

Why have you not contributed much Scara? It seems like all you've done is get in a fight with Jugan, and seem condescending overall and focus on how the quality of the posts suck. You keep asking questions, but where's your analysis of anything?


So from this game I'm assuming Caller is a "big player," of course this could be an incorrect assumption since I have not gone through previous games to see what Caller is like, but he certainly gives off that impression.
So scara in your first vote you said:

So you voted for a big player AND an inactive...I don't get it.
You then retract your vote because you didn't read carefully, and just throw out names randomly while stating you haven't finished reading yet...

And then finally vote for Jugan, basically because he clutters up the thread rather than you think he is mafia.

Now today you just bandwagon vote Caller, implying that you need no reasoning because motbob already said it. I've given more reason to vote Caller than you have.

So Scara, could you please explain your reasoning, rather than asking other people to do so for you?

On April 24 2010 18:07 Incognito wrote:
Fishball: Its day 3, you're a troll, and you gotta come out now. Thanks. Oh also one interesting thing to note is that you comment saying the zbot archive is awesome. Why is this so? Either you just threw this out there to fake activity, or you're actually using it to do analysis. Take your pick.

Bill Murray: At first he made me think he was just playing usual and just be ignored. But his posting has dramatically declined. Busy? Thinks he's in the clear? Not his spammy usual self anymore. But then again, its really hard to read him. If he's mafia, he may be receiving orders from a strong mafia player (BC). Lets see if his posting deteriorates even more after BC is offed. He's been acting inconsistently though. No. 1 RC suspect imo.

Scaramanga: You've been useless enough, been called out enough times on it, and haven't responded. Moreover, you seem to be active elsewhere but not here. You've been around long enough to know what is expected.

motbob: motbob is inconsistent. Besides his early useless posts, he posts this:

But only two posts later, he says:

So the town is on the right track, but then only two posts later we're doomed? What happened? I'm sure the night kills didn't change your mind that much...your posting is inconsistent, and you just seem to be stirring the pot and trying to avoid discussion when possible. Then, you pop up and say we're doomed, likely because you want to out all the power roles. Given that I still think there's at least 2 medics in there, that would help you a lot if you were mafia, right? Trying to push the boat in the direction you want? Seems like it to me.

Falcynn: I thought you could've been mafiassassin given that you were talking a lot about assassins in your early posts. But now that all the assassins are gone, I guess that clears a few things up. Other than that, advocates a randomlynch, posts more useless information, then responds to me. Then your posts really start to slide. Defending your terrible play, admitting to active lurking, and even more defense of your terrible play. I wish townies would just stop defending their terrible play. Either way, I don't think you're a townie, so whatever. In response to your post, I had an inkling AFJ was an assassin, and felt bored last night. Sadly, he didn't bother following through and choosing to kill you. If you tried to kill him to stop his hit from coming through, it wouldn't work, all night actions happen simultaneously. So no, I won't use that excuse, but then again, I don't really need to.

d3: hmm the Caller-is-innocent vibes may have been coming from reading my list of innocents. Blindly following me? Or having a subconscious bias of Caller's innocence because of my statement? Other than that, he seems to be posting like normal from past games. I like my other suspects better. Although d3 hasn't been extremely helpful. Hmm...I seem to remember that he is usually more technical and planning-oriented. Didn't see too much of that in his current posts.

Scamp: probably town. I like RoL(?)'s and meeple's latest analysis of him. yeah, he voted jpak, but I don't know how much weight that holds for me. His mention of TheLardyGooser doesn't seem a mafia oriented action. And even though he's been around for a while, I don't think he would be one to accuse his own mafia member off the bat. Although given the weird activities going around lately, I wouldn't be surprised if the mafia had a solid player around trying to coach the weaker ones. (Would make sense since BC has been so inactive all game).

Anyway, paper due on monday morning, so I will probably be less active until then. Looks like not much is happening right now though.

On April 27 2010 23:07 RaGe wrote:
I changed my mind

Scaramanga is mafia.

On May 02 2010 13:35 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
from our thread "night 3 hits" on the mafia discussion board:


good stuff. i'll dig thru chat logs and see if i can find anything good.

On May 02 2010 18:42 flamewheel91 wrote:

There was outside influence for BC not performing.
Just saying.

｡◕‿◕｡