EPTRemember that activity is needed to make this a fun game, so everyone lurking should also be posting
BloodyC0bblers's Mafia XVI - Page 17
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Remember that activity is needed to make this a fun game, so everyone lurking should also be posting | ||
|
dozko
United Kingdom160 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On January 22 2010 02:06 dozko wrote: The way I see it there are three main candidates - Fulgrim, tree.hugger and d3_crescentia. I did not vote for Fulgrim, although i tend to agree with a post he made on Quickstriker and Xelin before my analysis. He is the most popular candidate although he has listed the least number of arguments to support his campaign. This I find slightly suspicious. On January 22 2010 00:30 ShoCkeyy wrote: The other 25% go to those who are quietly coming in that have watched us argue about who to lynch first. I feel like they watched us bicker to see and now that we have some what of an idea who we're going to lynch first. Now the mafia come in to back them up so we an lynch a townie. Which brings me to my other conclusion. Decafchicken I'm watching you. On January 22 2010 06:54 decafchicken wrote: I vote for fulgrim VERY SUSPICIOUS. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On January 22 2010 06:31 Fulgrim wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 22 2010 02:06 dozko wrote: Xelin, I did not quote all of your posts since that post I made was getting enormous. I think people are not too lazy to go a few pages back and read what you have written, so I dont see how you use this as a basis against my argument? In any case I have already put my reasoning up, because thats what I think. People are free to form their own opinion and seeing as how you ignored most of my points and misread the others I do not feel the need to return to that thread of argument. On another more pressing note i put my vote in the other thread for d3_crescentia for mayor. I will now post my reasoning for doing so here. The way I see it there are three main candidates - Fulgrim, tree.hugger and d3_crescentia. I did not vote for Fulgrim, although i tend to agree with a post he made on Quickstriker and Xelin before my analysis. He is the most popular candidate although he has listed the least number of arguments to support his campaign. This I find slightly suspicious. tree.hugger I find is a bit of an enigma right now, since he has only made a few long posts and attempted to impersonate a "sage of wisdom" in all of them. I have not yet formed an opinion of him but I am suspicious when people try to tell me how and what I should look out for. I voted for d3_crescentia because 1) He has made good analysis of the narration and I do not believe that any mafia would go in such details like separating prose from poetry etc. 2) He has a very neutral style of posting, i.e. he does not jump on bandwagons too quickly, and is taking the input of other posters very seriously, even when It is not completely in tune with his own. These I feel are good attributes for a mayor to have and he is the only candidate to actually sort of back up the attributes he claimed he possessed in his campaign with his subsequent posts. 3) He is one of the most active posters, and this will be good for us if he can continue in such fashion when we have more information. Dozko brings up a few good points about the candidates. I find your analysis of tree.hugger interesting because thats exactly how I see you, you came out of nowhere with several fat posts chalked full of analysis, which made me suspicious at first. Although it seems as though this is the style of some players (tree.hugger and others). I think that people are too caught up on Xelin's and Quickstrikers arguments as they could both be mafia trying to distract us and polarize the town, or neither could be mafia and just both paranoid. Either way I feel too much of the discussion has been focused on that. Also I'm glad to see more people becoming active, which is great. However I am still going to follow through on my plan if you elect me and kill one of the least active people, so get posting. (No voting for me will not guarantee that you will not be lynched if you haven't posted anything at all yet) It's just how I roll. I have my suspicions like the rest of you, but I really don't have much to base anything on. I'm trying to get people to think the right way, before jumping headlong into analysis. The point is to think for yourself at all costs, and constantly check people's language for clues. And of course, don't immediately tip people off that you suspect them of something or another. If you tell people you suspect they're mafia because they don't capitalize their "i's" then mafia or not, they'll start capitalizing their "i's". I've always loved mafia because of the psychology of it all. | ||
|
Fulgrim
United States560 Posts
On January 22 2010 07:01 ShoCkeyy wrote: VERY SUSPICIOUS. While I don't exactly agree with the accusation along with this post, I agree we should be watching this election closely because the results will be very telling to weed out potential mafia. Especially towards the end if there is a mass shift in who everyone is voting for. The mafia have 7 votes, which they will probably use to get who they want in office. I think that dozko forgot to mention in his list of candidates Iaaan, who has brought up some good points so far. (He is the person I'm considering voting for) I think that before people vote they should make sure they have read some of his posts. (and every candidates) | ||
|
decafchicken
United States19927 Posts
On January 22 2010 07:01 ShoCkeyy wrote: VERY SUSPICIOUS. OH FUCK DECAF VOTED FOR THE LEADING CANDIDATE LYNCH THE SCUM But seriously, i was between tree hugger and fulgrim because they seem to have the most common sense and not overreacting about little shit but fulgrim is being more active so i went with him. edit: and as people analyze who votes for who, we should also be watching at who is abstaining which is equally important. | ||
|
haster27
Taiwan809 Posts
 | ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
| ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
On January 22 2010 07:29 decafchicken wrote: edit: and as people analyze who votes for who, we should also be watching at who is abstaining which is equally important. Of course its a factor to consider, but what do you think abstaining says about someone? | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
On January 20 2010 20:51 RoyW wrote: Based on his contribution so far, I'm going to second XeliN in his bid for nomination. It's important that we have someone active in the thread as mayor or sherrif, and also good to have someone providing reasoning behind thier decisions, whether they be good or bad. because of that post, pretty early on, and that's all he has really said. lol | ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
| ||
|
iLoveKT
Philippines3615 Posts
Reading 15 pages of text now | ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
On January 22 2010 09:11 Iaaan wrote: because of that post, pretty early on, and that's all he has really said. lol Just a small comment on this... seems like RoyW hasn't posted in the vote thread. | ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
| ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
- Lunaticman - IplayThings - Nigol I have not checked the other thread by Plexa to see if they have confirmed their access to the forum. | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
QuickStriker
United States3694 Posts
I'm back but I'm going to choose abstain since I really can't choose who I would lean towards.... I shall let fate (other townies but me) decide the mayor/sheriff.... Note: Mayor is #2 of the most vote and Sheriff is #1 of total vote. So remember that people..... | ||
|
Fulgrim
United States560 Posts
Current votes: tree.hugger - 4 Fulgrim - 3 d3_crescentia - 3 Ian - 3 XeliN - 2 Abstain: 8 Total: 23 | ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
On January 22 2010 10:01 d3_crescentia wrote: As of now, we have the following who have not posted after the Day 1 post: - Lunaticman - IplayThings - Nigol I have not checked the other thread by Plexa to see if they have confirmed their access to the forum. None of these have posted in the Mafia 16 thread and can be regarded as most inactive. | ||
| ||
