On January 20 2010 14:33 citi.zen wrote:
Hobbes maybe fits the "barbaric noises" and "raised fists" description. Also, he has the NyC before the name - the "big apple".

i like this

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 13:06 GMT

#163

"same way that their bodies blended in with the encroaching night."
who's to say there were clues in the firstplace? perhaps the people have blank profiles

also, has anyone analyzed the reference to wild ponies?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 15:06 GMT

#169

I am liking citi.zen's analysis. The second killer, though, is more of a mystery. I am going to propose that they do not have a signature or a profile that anything could be taken from, thus resulting in the lack of clues.

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 15:54 GMT

#176

what are your alls opinions on the upcoming election?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:05 GMT

#181

a scythe, that thing the grim reaper carries, with a thin blade on the end

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:11 GMT

#183

we can agree that killer #2 has no real clues other than the fact that they are a cold, calculated killer who left no clues... which to me indicates a lack of a profile/signature... so it could be relevant to their name. im going to scan the player list

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:13 GMT

#184

the most evil, calculated name i've found would be kane]deth[. that seems fitting for killer #2. it is pure speculation, though.

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:27 GMT

#187

ok, if we're going to talk about #1, who is more likely to be it: keit or hobbes?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:27 GMT

#188

i also saw someone mention stimilant

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:33 GMT

#190

i would probably abstain, as i wouldn't want to vote without being pretty certain. we're just speculating... we will get more clues in the future

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:39 GMT

#193

On January 20 2010 21:57 citi.zen wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

If I am elected I will lynch hobbes. I identified him as a suspect and he still best fits the clues. I also suggested we separate our analysis between bad guy one and two for clarity.As an elected official I would continue to do more of the same, as well as use my powers to get extra clues.

citi.zen

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:51 GMT

#199

yea, his edit was adding on, not erasing something he felt made him look bad or incriminating. i'll attest to that as i read it before and after said edit.

citi.zen -> as long as you/DH/meeple get mayor i'm happy
i don't mind t_co being sheriff, unless he puts me in the slammer, in which case i will cry

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:54 GMT

#201

i hadn't thought about that... i just don't like jail

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:58 GMT

#204

yeah, i was about to say that. wouldn't it suck if he incarcerated our medic?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 17:04 GMT

#206

i was just thinking this: everyone is agreeing to lynch someone tonight. everyone is wanting to kill Ng5 (for instance, not saying they want to). the mayor decides to kill blue_arrow out of the blue. i vote we lynch the mayor next if this happens... the mayor can be mafia right?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 17:08 GMT

#210

yeah thats what im saying

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 17:19 GMT

#214

789 my theory is not thrown out the window... it is correct
town wants player A lynched tonight
mayor lynches player B instead
Player B and mayor are either friends or mafia, and are going against the town's wishes.
We should then lynch the mayor, as he has 3 possible votes per voting window. Him saying "i vote for [NyC]Hobbes" = 3 votes. We can't have someone doing that and going against the wishes of the majority of the town.

i suppose the mayor could do this just on a whim, but would we want someone like that as the mayor even if they arent mafia?