Ps: my vote for you is not a strong one. In my heart I hope you live and are innocent, you are active and if green or blue losing you would be tragic. At this point I just don't know, or have enough time to investigate further, and unfortunately I still have to vote, despite these. Reservations.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 02:20 GMT

#1216

Ok, sadly we failed again. And again, this does not give us much additional info.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 02:42 GMT

#1221

My votes were correctly represented: no to double lynching, yes to lynching DrH.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 13:20 GMT

#1278

A couple of random observations, which will not help anyone at this point: the mafia killed the first three people if you list naes alphabetically, ignoring punctuation marks; we complain about clues, but in the end we did not really use the strongest ones for lynching either night. Hobbes and freewheel are still with us, and t_co and kane turned out to be green.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 13:28 GMT

#1279

One more comment: there is a mention after the last lynching of the second amendment, which is the right to bear guns.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 14:14 GMT

#1283

Good question. I took them to have the same clue/no clue area layout as the days. Now that I look at the night posts again, I think that is wrong and there probably are no clues there.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 14:14 GMT

#1284

Ah, thanks for that.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 14:53 GMT

#1285

BloodyC0bbler's mafia game ain't going any better for the town.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 15:04 GMT

#1288

On January 26 2010 00:00 flamewheel91 wrote:

Show nested quote +

flamewheel

I agree though: until we get the next set of clues, it would be prudent for us to look based on players' actions and interactions.

Seeing as how I cannot actually dissuade people from logic since clues are there, I invite persons who have suspicions about me to interrogate me further.

I don't see how we are saying the same thing: you are suggesting looking at people's actions instead of clues, I am stating that we tried tha with t_co and kane, and it has not worked out very well.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 15:08 GMT

#1291

Just keep in mind that t_co was lynched solely on suspicious behavior. I am not saying it is always the wrong approach, just that it can easily backfire.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 21:42 GMT

#1302

There are way too many inactive players, who barely do anything but the bare minimum not to get mod killed. Given the size of this group, it makes perfect sense for the mafia to hide in that bunch, as Ser Aspi said already. I say in the future we pick some people in that inactive group, based on whatever clues we can gather.

I still like Hobbes and keit for example. They are the best fit for the night 1 killed 1, and they certainly don't seem interested in solving this thing or contributing. When accused, they quickly sprung to action, then faded back into the crowd.

Just my 2c.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 22:15 GMT

#1308

The 20 posts were primarily defensive, no? I did not see a concerted effort to "solve" the mysteries. As you mention, you are not alone, but that would be the whole idea...

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 22:19 GMT

#1310

I mean, if you read the thread regularly and generally reply promptly, I would think there would be... more.

I don't mean to single you out, keit, hyperbola, free and a few others are in the same boat.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 25 2010 22:30 GMT

#1314

Of course it isn't. I just feel that at least 5/7 Mafia will hide with the inactives. So before we go on lynching active posters, who at least leave a paper trail, I would suggest focusing on these guys.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 26 2010 00:10 GMT

#1317

You weren't "singled out" - it was a bunch of names listed in no particular order. The strategy behind picking them was the more important idea, not the names.

789 - interesting find!