That reminds me one of my favourite quotes.

Sorry if I sound blunt. It's probably because I am.

I don't argue. Ever. I state things. Then people decide if they think them to be facts or bullshit. Who knows.

You change your opinion faster than my ex-wife changed outfits daily. And that's no small feat.

People either see it - which case I don't need to say more other than it pointing out.

Or they don't - which case they won't, so I don't need to say more other than pointing it out.

Easy as cake, simple as whistling Dixie.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 01:07 GMT

#1458

On January 27 2010 06:45 Ng5 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Wait a minute...

I don't know much about wrestling, but... Someone could look into it. A wrestler! It's usual in wrestling to grab the other's face trying to hit them to solid objects, no? Or some kind of modern-age gladiator 'reality show'? There was also one with... Bucket heads and blunt objects trying to push each other off of planks into water, no? It could fit the... Geez.

It could fit the PAIL! There was this gladiator or what show. They had bucket-helmets like those from rugby and they tried to kick each other off of planks (pails) into water or nets or whatever.

And then there's the wrestler thing. It could be two mafia members, but both worth researching I think.

With keywords like... Sledgehammer... Barbaric... Or animalistic?

Again it takes a lot of strength to grab someone by the head...

Wait... I just google image findered Mystlord and what did it drop right off the bat?

Mystlord

Hammer.

Bucket helm.

Even if the post wasn't made by a user called Mystlord. It was dropped to a Mystlord search.

Second

And this is the picture from the previous site if you click on the under the post in question which directs you to a pgn names Mystlord.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 01:09 GMT

#1459

^
'...if you click on the link under the post...'

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 03:22 GMT

#1471

If either one of them turns up red it doesn't mean the other isn't.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 03:29 GMT

#1475

We're also getting ahead of clues which are probably overlapping each other. It would also benefit the mafia to sacrifice one member for the possible safety of another. Wouldn't it?

Enough of this. Time to decide, everyone can do it on their own.

Today's decision and the consequences will pretty much decide which side will win.

It can be either 10-11 vs 3 for town or complete and utter annihilation.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 03:35 GMT

#1477

Vote or die.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 03:50 GMT

#1483

^And he also tried discrediting me right after I said something about the Doc, not a second sooner.

G'nite people. As I said before.

Vote or die.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 03:50 GMT

#1484

^ meaning Myst.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 17:58 GMT

#1529

This hasn't been too busy of a day till now.

I thought it would be more active.

I'm gonna cook dinner and see if anything turns up in the meantime.

(Yes this post is not contributing, it's main a bookmark for me to easily catch the point till I read so far.)

Ng5

702 Posts

January 27 2010 23:26 GMT

#1544

On January 28 2010 08:19 Nikoner wrote:
OK, to me it seems that the case against Dr. Helvetica is fairly closed by the majority.

However, with our apparent less than stellar clue interpretation so far, I do not feel like the double lynch is warranted yet, unless you guys are 100% sure that with tomorrow's clues we will be able to find out a mafia person.

I think we already have stellar clues about at least two guesses which won't get any more stellar with more murders from their account, nor would the suspicion die down in their case.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 00:14 GMT

#1547

I think if we score two out of three we are fine.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 02:37 GMT

#1558

On January 27 2010 09:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Back your shit up instead of making arrogant jokes and acting like you know something everyone doesn't.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 02:38 GMT

#1560

^Cough cough, Jayme, cough cough.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 02:39 GMT

#1561

You're dead.
Now shut up like a good little hellspawn.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 02:52 GMT

#1564

Yes. Paint me the bad mannered one here, please.

Then tell me who mentioned Jayme aside from me and how I wanted to lynch him next.

It's called credit where it's due against BM reactions which didn't even worth a reply before.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 03:05 GMT

#1569

I don't know from what you think I was ever nervous or angry.

I haven't accused anyone. I said possible clues without stating my opinion - I even stated it.

Then I've shown one piece of my opinion and that was Jayme. I chose him because noone ever wanted to kill him and I was sure it's a hit.

I thought people could sum up two and two and see it as a reply to backupifyouactlikeyouknowshitotherpeopledontaaaargh.

Well, maybe now.

Howcome noone told Doc to take a step back with much more aggressive posts?

And he was suspicious from day one. From the second my previous two quotes from him about mayor wannabes happened. I would have wanted to lynch him next, after winning some credibility with Jayme.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 03:09 GMT

#1573

On January 28 2010 12:02 meeple wrote:
You were pretty clearly sarcastic and arrogant.

You're wrong. I am.

Now let's get back to hunting.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 03:15 GMT

#1576

We have a good chance at 14 vs 3. That's pretty slick.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 03:23 GMT

#1579

On January 28 2010 12:17 flamewheel91 wrote:
Wait, 3?
Funny how much difference one event can make, eh?

It was bound to happen if heads start falling. And it had to happen in one of two ways.

Either with something big, or something unexpected - to gain enough credibility for the suggester for future events.

Citi.zen wanted big first I planned unexpected. Both had its merits. I probably couldn't have pulled off Doc on the first try this slick, but the main target was him for me, too - right from day one.

So props to Citi.zen for getting this together.

Ng5

702 Posts

January 28 2010 03:33 GMT

#1585

On January 28 2010 12:30 Nikoner wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yeah, but we'd be behind if we get a mafioso and a townie instead of just 1 mafioso.

Right now we would pretty much lynch the same couple suspects no matter what they turned later.

So might as well get over them asap and see what falls.