we can agree that killer #2 has no real clues other than the fact that they are a cold, calculated killer who left no clues... which to me indicates a lack of a profile/signature... so it could be relevant to their name. im going to scan the player list

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:13 GMT

#184

the most evil, calculated name i've found would be kane]deth[. that seems fitting for killer #2. it is pure speculation, though.

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:14 GMT

#185

I've got nothing for the list of daggers. Though admittedly I was only comparing names. It is possible that I missed a profile connection.

The closest I came was Phrujbaz to a Phurba. They are decently close, but the R and U being switched makes me think that it is unrelated.

meeple

Canada10211 Posts

January 20 2010 16:15 GMT

#186

In lieu of any revelation, we can probably safely give up on mobster #2 for now... we can't accuse anyone with any certainty just going off "Your name has deth in it" or similar statements

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:27 GMT

#187

ok, if we're going to talk about #1, who is more likely to be it: keit or hobbes?

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:27 GMT

#188

i also saw someone mention stimilant

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:28 GMT

#189

If I HAD to pick someone it would be hobbes; the connection seems a bit stronger than keit's, Though I'm not entirely convinced. But if we were voting to lynch today, I'd either abstain or go hobbes.

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:33 GMT

#190

i would probably abstain, as i wouldn't want to vote without being pretty certain. we're just speculating... we will get more clues in the future

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:36 GMT

#191

Yeah. We'll get at least one more day of clues before we have to vote anyway. Only the mayor has to worry about first day lynching. It would also suck to vote without enough evidence and lynch a detective on accident lol.

DoctorHelvetica

United States15034 Posts

January 20 2010 16:37 GMT

#192

So as we see it now, whoever is elected mayor should be lynching Hobbes? That first lynch can't go to waste and he's definitely the most suspicious as of now.

There are also 5 other mafia not described in clues from this post, keep that in mind.

Also, who all is running?

t_co (platform is mafia experience)
myself (platform is going along with the town, being very active)
meeple (platform isn't really anything at all)
citi.zen (platform is going along with the town/being helpful)

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:39 GMT

#193

On January 20 2010 21:57 citi.zen wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

If I am elected I will lynch hobbes. I identified him as a suspect and he still best fits the clues. I also suggested we separate our analysis between bad guy one and two for clarity.As an elected official I would continue to do more of the same, as well as use my powers to get extra clues.

citi.zen

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:42 GMT

#194

I think citi.zen is running too. It is really the mayor's choice, he can lynch whoever he wants.

citi.zen

2509 Posts

January 20 2010 16:43 GMT

#195

If nobody new is running I guess I will vote for DH/meeple or abstain. I just can't support t_co, who hasn't read the rules/contributed anything yet beyond the "vote for me" post to the game. Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind in future elections.

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:44 GMT

#196

DoctoerHelvetica, you aren't allowed to edit posts in mafia. Just letting you know. I know your edit was harmless, adding cite.zen and candidate platforms, just double post next time :D.

DoctorHelvetica

United States15034 Posts

January 20 2010 16:47 GMT

#197

whoops, my bad.

forgot about that one.

789

United States959 Posts

January 20 2010 16:48 GMT

#198

It's no problem, I believe everyone can agree to let than harmless one slide.

Bill Murray

United States9292 Posts

January 20 2010 16:51 GMT

#199

yea, his edit was adding on, not erasing something he felt made him look bad or incriminating. i'll attest to that as i read it before and after said edit.

citi.zen -> as long as you/DH/meeple get mayor i'm happy
i don't mind t_co being sheriff, unless he puts me in the slammer, in which case i will cry