On January 11 2010 06:05 Zato-1 wrote:
Okay, so. Tonight, I'm hitting Ace. Why? Here's a list of Ace's posts from the last mafia game I played, in which he was mafia:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler [1] +
+ Show Spoiler [2] +
+ Show Spoiler [3] +
+ Show Spoiler [4] +
+ Show Spoiler [5] +
+ Show Spoiler [6] +
+ Show Spoiler [7] +
+ Show Spoiler [8] +
+ Show Spoiler [9] +
+ Show Spoiler [10] +
+ Show Spoiler [11] +
+ Show Spoiler [12] +
+ Show Spoiler [13] +
+ Show Spoiler [14] +
+ Show Spoiler [15] +
+ Show Spoiler [16] +
+ Show Spoiler [17] +
+ Show Spoiler [18] +
+ Show Spoiler [19] +
+ Show Spoiler [20] +
+ Show Spoiler [21] +
+ Show Spoiler [22] +
+ Show Spoiler [23] +
You can easily categorize all of his posts in two categories:
Chaff: He talks but essentially says nothing. Posts # 1 through 6, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20 are of this kind.
Guilt Trips: Since he's basically committed to nothing all game, he weighs down on those who have done something whenever they were wrong. Posts #7, 11, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22 and 23 are of this kind.
Ace's strategy was to sit back, feign activity, and pounce on Town members whenever they made a mistake.
Now, take a look at Ace's posts in the current game:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler [1] +
+ Show Spoiler [2] +
+ Show Spoiler [3] +
+ Show Spoiler [4] +
+ Show Spoiler [5] +
+ Show Spoiler [6] +
+ Show Spoiler [7] +
+ Show Spoiler [8] +
+ Show Spoiler [9] +
+ Show Spoiler [10] +
+ Show Spoiler [11] +
+ Show Spoiler [12] +
+ Show Spoiler [13] +
+ Show Spoiler [14] +
+ Show Spoiler [15] +
+ Show Spoiler [16] +
+ Show Spoiler [17] +
+ Show Spoiler [18] +
+ Show Spoiler [19] +
+ Show Spoiler [20] +
+ Show Spoiler [21] +
+ Show Spoiler [22] +
+ Show Spoiler [23] +
+ Show Spoiler [24] +
+ Show Spoiler [25] +
+ Show Spoiler [26] +
+ Show Spoiler [27] +
+ Show Spoiler [28] +
+ Show Spoiler [29] +
+ Show Spoiler [30] +
+ Show Spoiler [31] +
+ Show Spoiler [32] +
+ Show Spoiler [33] +
+ Show Spoiler [34] +
+ Show Spoiler [35] +
+ Show Spoiler [36] +
+ Show Spoiler [37] +
+ Show Spoiler [38] +
+ Show Spoiler [39] +
+ Show Spoiler [40] +
+ Show Spoiler [41] +
+ Show Spoiler [42] +
+ Show Spoiler [43] +
+ Show Spoiler [44] +
+ Show Spoiler [45] +
+ Show Spoiler [46] +
+ Show Spoiler [47] +
+ Show Spoiler [48] +
+ Show Spoiler [49] +
+ Show Spoiler [50] +
+ Show Spoiler [51] +
+ Show Spoiler [52] +
Yeah, that's a lot of posts alright. But, I've done some work and categorized them for you again:
Chaff posts where he makes comments and maybe triest to set a mood or give an idea of his thoughts: Posts #1 through 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51 and 52.
Posts with content:
Posts #34, 36, 37, 38, 42 and 43 are essentially guilt trips; someone did a mistake, and he's calling them out on it. Posts #8, 13, 15, 18, 23 and 39 are posts in which he justifies attempts to lynch Judge for his day 1 roleclaiming.
Now for the analysis:
- There's nothing suspicious about making Chaff posts. Everyone makes them, some more than others.
- Guilt Trip posts are of a different kind; when the Town makes a mistake, instead of trying to pick up the broken pieces and move on to the next course of action, Ace focuses on kicking the parties responsible for the mistake while they're down. This is done to lower Town morale and attempt to make Town players bitter, and recriminate themselves about who's responsible for what- while he sits back and watches.
- His posts against Judge are probably just the fact that his dislike for day 1 roleclaiming happened to coincide with a daring Town initiative for getting organized. Two birds with one stone there (personal satisfaction & lynching a potential Town organizer), and he can just blame his zeal against day 1 roleclaiming for persecuting Judge.
- What seems to be the connecting trend between Ace's posts? The only thing he's actually committed to, was persecuting Judge, and for a pretty bad reason at that ("I think he's lying about being a Medic, so he has to be mafia"). Other than that, he's content to sit back, make a lot of posts with little substance, and punish Town members when they make a wrong call. Does this seem like a game-winning plan for Town to you? 'cause it looks a lot more like a mafia trying to sow dissent among the Town while appearing to be active, to me.
For this reason, tonight I am going to kill Ace.
Okay, so. Tonight, I'm hitting Ace. Why? Here's a list of Ace's posts from the last mafia game I played, in which he was mafia:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler [1] +
On August 20 2009 10:54 Ace wrote:
o shit wtf 5 hours passed fast
o shit wtf 5 hours passed fast
+ Show Spoiler [2] +
On August 20 2009 10:58 Ace wrote:
can someone update me on everything that happened? I skimmed and saw people suggesting to lynch me?
can someone update me on everything that happened? I skimmed and saw people suggesting to lynch me?
+ Show Spoiler [3] +
On August 20 2009 11:03 Ace wrote:
ok so Sato snitched on himself lulz
Medics aren't informed of prots? :/ That sucks.
Vigi shouldn't hit anyone until they are solid the person is red.
ok so Sato snitched on himself lulz
Medics aren't informed of prots? :/ That sucks.
Vigi shouldn't hit anyone until they are solid the person is red.
+ Show Spoiler [4] +
On August 20 2009 11:10 Ace wrote:
:/
Well enough about me, what are we doing right now?
:/
Well enough about me, what are we doing right now?
+ Show Spoiler [5] +
On August 20 2009 11:23 Ace wrote:
That pretty much ups Zeto's innocence. If he was really anti-town I doubt he'd want to cast a spotlight on his own Mafia ally. Especially in a game this small.
Other than this there aren't even any patterns yet are there? Day 1 votes don't seem too telling.
That pretty much ups Zeto's innocence. If he was really anti-town I doubt he'd want to cast a spotlight on his own Mafia ally. Especially in a game this small.
Other than this there aren't even any patterns yet are there? Day 1 votes don't seem too telling.
+ Show Spoiler [6] +
On August 20 2009 11:28 Ace wrote:
Why not? Just because you accused someone doesn't hold weight. It would be one thing if you accused Chezinu and the town rallied behind you but you didn't have time to lynch. Then it would have been dumb to kill him. However that didn't happen. You accused him, but no one really went with it. By killing Chezinu you lose nothing since you didn't have any support in the first place.
Why not? Just because you accused someone doesn't hold weight. It would be one thing if you accused Chezinu and the town rallied behind you but you didn't have time to lynch. Then it would have been dumb to kill him. However that didn't happen. You accused him, but no one really went with it. By killing Chezinu you lose nothing since you didn't have any support in the first place.
+ Show Spoiler [7] +
On August 20 2009 11:33 Ace wrote:
I understand what you're saying but it just doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Chezinu seemed normal :/
Either way I guess the good news is no one super valuable has been killed yet (lol sorry Chez)
I understand what you're saying but it just doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Chezinu seemed normal :/
Either way I guess the good news is no one super valuable has been killed yet (lol sorry Chez)
+ Show Spoiler [8] +
On August 20 2009 11:36 Ace wrote:
hold on a sec. Three of you voted for Inf out of no where with barely any reasoning except that he's throwing names out. That happens every mafia game. And Foolishness voted for Inf out of no where first with no reasoning.
hold on a sec. Three of you voted for Inf out of no where with barely any reasoning except that he's throwing names out. That happens every mafia game. And Foolishness voted for Inf out of no where first with no reasoning.
+ Show Spoiler [9] +
On August 20 2009 11:39 Ace wrote:
well between you, Qatol and Pyrr something isn't rightdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
1.) You voted for Inf
2.) Qatol votes for Inf and THEN posts a reason for it
3.) Pyrr votes for inf and also posts a reason
Seems odd doesn't it? Especially since you're vote came in first before any reasonings.
well between you, Qatol and Pyrr something isn't right
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
1.) You voted for Inf
2.) Qatol votes for Inf and THEN posts a reason for it
3.) Pyrr votes for inf and also posts a reason
Seems odd doesn't it? Especially since you're vote came in first before any reasonings.
+ Show Spoiler [10] +
On August 20 2009 11:47 Ace wrote:
no, that was more for Foolishness. As in 2 of you had reasons, he didn't. And he voted first of all 3 of you.
no, that was more for Foolishness. As in 2 of you had reasons, he didn't. And he voted first of all 3 of you.
+ Show Spoiler [11] +
On August 20 2009 11:53 Ace wrote:
actually no, I've been watching. I always try to play in a way that avoids innocent deaths. You guys bandwagoned Inf to death. Switching around votes randomly just makes it easier for Mafia to bandwagon. Right now you, Qatol, Pyrr, and Zato are all suspects. Wouldn't you agree?
actually no, I've been watching. I always try to play in a way that avoids innocent deaths. You guys bandwagoned Inf to death. Switching around votes randomly just makes it easier for Mafia to bandwagon. Right now you, Qatol, Pyrr, and Zato are all suspects. Wouldn't you agree?
+ Show Spoiler [12] +
On August 20 2009 11:56 Ace wrote:
also Midori too, I didn't even realize he voted.
also Midori too, I didn't even realize he voted.
+ Show Spoiler [13] +
On August 20 2009 12:02 Ace wrote:
The Sato thing is over and done with but it does look good for you. I'm just saying you can't go around starting bandwagons, and when they turn out wrong act like it's just an oops moment. One of you guys has to pay.
@Midori: Ok be suspicious of me but I didnt get a medic killed did I.
The Sato thing is over and done with but it does look good for you. I'm just saying you can't go around starting bandwagons, and when they turn out wrong act like it's just an oops moment. One of you guys has to pay.
@Midori: Ok be suspicious of me but I didnt get a medic killed did I.
+ Show Spoiler [14] +
On August 20 2009 12:06 Ace wrote:
Which would actually be a good Mafia defense don't you think?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
"I can't be Mafia, my vote didn't even change anything!"
Which would actually be a good Mafia defense don't you think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
"I can't be Mafia, my vote didn't even change anything!"
+ Show Spoiler [15] +
On August 20 2009 12:12 Ace wrote:
Qatol if Infundibulum was a Medic how could he safely make that claim to you? He'd never know your roledata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Qatol if Infundibulum was a Medic how could he safely make that claim to you? He'd never know your role
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
+ Show Spoiler [16] +
On August 20 2009 12:18 Ace wrote:
@Vivi: How has he sacrificed his own? You guys all said Sato pretty much told on himself so how is that relevant?
@Vivi: How has he sacrificed his own? You guys all said Sato pretty much told on himself so how is that relevant?
+ Show Spoiler [17] +
On August 20 2009 12:21 Ace wrote:
Your kidding right? You mean I haven't just started accusing everyone of being mafia all willy nilly is more like it. I've only focused on the mistakes that I've seen this game and the fact that some of you except Foolishness won't even embrace is it is suspicious. Pyrr had a so-so defense. But you and Qatol have pretty much ignored me.
Your kidding right? You mean I haven't just started accusing everyone of being mafia all willy nilly is more like it. I've only focused on the mistakes that I've seen this game and the fact that some of you except Foolishness won't even embrace is it is suspicious. Pyrr had a so-so defense. But you and Qatol have pretty much ignored me.
+ Show Spoiler [18] +
On August 20 2009 12:22 Ace wrote:
we've only found 1, what do you want me to do magically pull one out my hat?
we've only found 1, what do you want me to do magically pull one out my hat?
+ Show Spoiler [19] +
On August 20 2009 12:26 Ace wrote:
just because you did that doesn't mean he's town aligned.
just because you did that doesn't mean he's town aligned.
+ Show Spoiler [20] +
On August 20 2009 12:28 Ace wrote:
Ok Foolishness, you see the wagon right? Seriously man. Just look at the voting thread.
Ok Foolishness, you see the wagon right? Seriously man. Just look at the voting thread.
+ Show Spoiler [21] +
On August 20 2009 12:31 Ace wrote:
Yea because it's the SAME people that got it wrong the first time. You mean to tell me you guys shouldn't be looking at your little group for the answers as to where the suspicions should go?
Yea because it's the SAME people that got it wrong the first time. You mean to tell me you guys shouldn't be looking at your little group for the answers as to where the suspicions should go?
+ Show Spoiler [22] +
On August 20 2009 12:32 Ace wrote:
and look at the shit you did now
and look at the shit you did now
+ Show Spoiler [23] +
You can easily categorize all of his posts in two categories:
Chaff: He talks but essentially says nothing. Posts # 1 through 6, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20 are of this kind.
Guilt Trips: Since he's basically committed to nothing all game, he weighs down on those who have done something whenever they were wrong. Posts #7, 11, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22 and 23 are of this kind.
Ace's strategy was to sit back, feign activity, and pounce on Town members whenever they made a mistake.
Now, take a look at Ace's posts in the current game:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler [1] +
On January 05 2010 21:24 Ace wrote:
I agree that killing useless players is always a sound strategy when there isn't a better idea. Of course with the what, 15 or so mafia games played so far that list isn't exactly hard to populate at the moment:
1.) vivi57
2.) nemy
3.) RebirthofLegend
And if any of you remember last game with the huge fuck ups of 3 players in particular the prime candidate for most detrimental to the town is RoL. He doesn't read and is a sheep. He's easily influenced and lets his emotions get to him and rarely if ever helps the town. Last game he didn't even realize he was being manipulated until the very end.
Vivi57 and nemy, well you guys already know how terrible both of them are. It's just that RoL is far worse than either of them.
I agree that killing useless players is always a sound strategy when there isn't a better idea. Of course with the what, 15 or so mafia games played so far that list isn't exactly hard to populate at the moment:
1.) vivi57
2.) nemy
3.) RebirthofLegend
And if any of you remember last game with the huge fuck ups of 3 players in particular the prime candidate for most detrimental to the town is RoL. He doesn't read and is a sheep. He's easily influenced and lets his emotions get to him and rarely if ever helps the town. Last game he didn't even realize he was being manipulated until the very end.
Vivi57 and nemy, well you guys already know how terrible both of them are. It's just that RoL is far worse than either of them.
+ Show Spoiler [2] +
On January 06 2010 02:25 Ace wrote:
I actually think it was a rather bad move. It's an 11 player game with 3 Mafia that have a grand total of 1 KP: why in the world would there be 2 medics?
This pretty much means judge is if innocent going to die Night 1 as there is 0 protection available if he really is a Medic. The only other circumstances come down to him being Mafia false role claiming Day 1, or he's the Vet hoping to absorb a hit. Either way I don't believe he's truly a medic because any real medic wouldn't have role claimed Day 1 in this format.
I actually think it was a rather bad move. It's an 11 player game with 3 Mafia that have a grand total of 1 KP: why in the world would there be 2 medics?
This pretty much means judge is if innocent going to die Night 1 as there is 0 protection available if he really is a Medic. The only other circumstances come down to him being Mafia false role claiming Day 1, or he's the Vet hoping to absorb a hit. Either way I don't believe he's truly a medic because any real medic wouldn't have role claimed Day 1 in this format.
+ Show Spoiler [3] +
On January 06 2010 10:43 Ace wrote:
First of all one thing I need to make clear: I've seen medics openly claim Day 1 before in similar formats and almost every single time they end in disaster and the town loses. Now before I go into specifics of why, Judge I know you've played on Mafiascum. Assuming they are pretty good over there you've probably seen a lot of possibilities for broken cop/medic claims that is doable in this game. That's the ONLY thing that makes me even remotely think you can be a legit medic. If that wasn't possible I'd just call for your lynch. The reasoning that Mafia wouldn't fake claim a medic because it offers little gain is moot - everyone would come to the same reasoning you just did (logically) and agree the medic is obviously real because no mafia would sac himself.
Which is wrong. Mafia KP is always 1. If we all come to that logical conclusion we in fact now have a Mafia who gained something for nothing because everyone thinks it's so stupid why would they do it.
Now the other reason Medic role claims end in disaster is that if you're lying the real medic doesn't know if you're a Vet false claiming or a Mafia in disguise. Regardless they won't talk to you, the cop can't do anything once he RCs you if you aren't a Medic and you will most certainly be dead soon. I think Scamp said it pretty well earlier: This is a guessing game, but now it's no longer a blind guessing game from the Mafia side but a potential shot of information they shouldn't have this early.
If you're gambit fails and you are really the medic and you die tonight, the game is going to be ridiculously hard for the town. You've got experience. You SHOULD know that with you not being able to be confirmed through medic protections we have no incentive to believe you at all. I'm inclined to say you're move is very anti-town at the moment.
First of all one thing I need to make clear: I've seen medics openly claim Day 1 before in similar formats and almost every single time they end in disaster and the town loses. Now before I go into specifics of why, Judge I know you've played on Mafiascum. Assuming they are pretty good over there you've probably seen a lot of possibilities for broken cop/medic claims that is doable in this game. That's the ONLY thing that makes me even remotely think you can be a legit medic. If that wasn't possible I'd just call for your lynch. The reasoning that Mafia wouldn't fake claim a medic because it offers little gain is moot - everyone would come to the same reasoning you just did (logically) and agree the medic is obviously real because no mafia would sac himself.
Which is wrong. Mafia KP is always 1. If we all come to that logical conclusion we in fact now have a Mafia who gained something for nothing because everyone thinks it's so stupid why would they do it.
Now the other reason Medic role claims end in disaster is that if you're lying the real medic doesn't know if you're a Vet false claiming or a Mafia in disguise. Regardless they won't talk to you, the cop can't do anything once he RCs you if you aren't a Medic and you will most certainly be dead soon. I think Scamp said it pretty well earlier: This is a guessing game, but now it's no longer a blind guessing game from the Mafia side but a potential shot of information they shouldn't have this early.
If you're gambit fails and you are really the medic and you die tonight, the game is going to be ridiculously hard for the town. You've got experience. You SHOULD know that with you not being able to be confirmed through medic protections we have no incentive to believe you at all. I'm inclined to say you're move is very anti-town at the moment.
+ Show Spoiler [4] +
On January 06 2010 10:46 Ace wrote:
I agree, except how do you know they are town? :/
Also remember we've seen plenty of times where Townies themselves contributed to the deception and cluster fuck of the game (see RoL in any game he plays).
I agree, except how do you know they are town? :/
Also remember we've seen plenty of times where Townies themselves contributed to the deception and cluster fuck of the game (see RoL in any game he plays).
+ Show Spoiler [5] +
On January 07 2010 04:15 Ace wrote:
I actually forgot about the VI thing. You really just sucked last game ^_^
I actually forgot about the VI thing. You really just sucked last game ^_^
+ Show Spoiler [6] +
On January 07 2010 04:25 Ace wrote:
I understand what you're trying to do it but it's not concrete enough. Judge is far more suspicious than Malongo posting about how he randomly thinks RoL is scummy.
I understand what you're trying to do it but it's not concrete enough. Judge is far more suspicious than Malongo posting about how he randomly thinks RoL is scummy.
+ Show Spoiler [7] +
On January 07 2010 04:35 Ace wrote:
BTW - Judge is mafia, calling it now.
BTW - Judge is mafia, calling it now.
+ Show Spoiler [8] +
On January 07 2010 05:55 Ace wrote:
Well I'm going to keep my vote on him because my standard policy for standard games still applies here: lynch Day 1 roleclaimers unless they have some serious proof or compelling argument.
Look at what Judge has just done.
Hey I'm a Medic!
this can't be proven or disproved by anyone
I have a plan, trust me!
why are we putting blind faith in him?
So because he MIGHT be a blue we shouldn't lynch him? That argument happens every game and I'm pretty sure we can all agree it's a useless platform to go on.
I said at the end of last mini mafia that anyone role claiming medic is destined to die. The Medic role generally wants to avoid getting hit even if he can protect himself. However he/she does it is whatever, but trying to attract fire would be unwise. Hence, Judge definitely is NOT a medic. No one has ever gotten a free pass for role claiming on Day 1 and those were almost always Detective claims. So why are we letting a Medic claim go?
Well I'm going to keep my vote on him because my standard policy for standard games still applies here: lynch Day 1 roleclaimers unless they have some serious proof or compelling argument.
Look at what Judge has just done.
Hey I'm a Medic!
this can't be proven or disproved by anyone
I have a plan, trust me!
why are we putting blind faith in him?
So because he MIGHT be a blue we shouldn't lynch him? That argument happens every game and I'm pretty sure we can all agree it's a useless platform to go on.
I said at the end of last mini mafia that anyone role claiming medic is destined to die. The Medic role generally wants to avoid getting hit even if he can protect himself. However he/she does it is whatever, but trying to attract fire would be unwise. Hence, Judge definitely is NOT a medic. No one has ever gotten a free pass for role claiming on Day 1 and those were almost always Detective claims. So why are we letting a Medic claim go?
+ Show Spoiler [9] +
On January 07 2010 06:25 Ace wrote:
what exceptional information? I really want to know this.
what exceptional information? I really want to know this.
+ Show Spoiler [10] +
On January 07 2010 06:31 Ace wrote:
I actually don't even care what his plan is. The fact that he has a plan and hasn't said a word about it speaks volumes. This is an 11 player game - what plan does he really have that's so fragile but powerful that it needs to be stated on Day 2 instead of Day 1? How does that help the town?
Secondly Townies shouldn't lie. Which means that if Judge is town he HAS TO BE A MEDIC. But in my last post I outlined that there is no possible way Judge can be a medic. Which means HE IS LYING.
I'm not going through this "he might be blue" shit again. I've said in countless games I really don't give a shit about not lynching someone solely because they might have a power role. If you make a big gamble and you make a mistake you deserve to be at the center of the lynch discussion.
I actually don't even care what his plan is. The fact that he has a plan and hasn't said a word about it speaks volumes. This is an 11 player game - what plan does he really have that's so fragile but powerful that it needs to be stated on Day 2 instead of Day 1? How does that help the town?
Secondly Townies shouldn't lie. Which means that if Judge is town he HAS TO BE A MEDIC. But in my last post I outlined that there is no possible way Judge can be a medic. Which means HE IS LYING.
I'm not going through this "he might be blue" shit again. I've said in countless games I really don't give a shit about not lynching someone solely because they might have a power role. If you make a big gamble and you make a mistake you deserve to be at the center of the lynch discussion.
+ Show Spoiler [11] +
On January 07 2010 07:07 Ace wrote:
Zato that would be a really odd mistake wouldn't it? Judge has experience playing Mafia on this site and another. If he never made that post I would have been fine with a no lynch for today.
Zato that would be a really odd mistake wouldn't it? Judge has experience playing Mafia on this site and another. If he never made that post I would have been fine with a no lynch for today.
+ Show Spoiler [12] +
On January 07 2010 07:35 Ace wrote:
If he does have a plan there isn't any reason to wait an entire Day to tell us. This is really one of the big signs painting him as Mafia to me. There is no reason to hold back. Secondly we do not know if he's telling the truth because we can't confirm it. This is the same thing we go through every game where for some reason people assume someone must be telling the truth IF they have a plan.
When? In most of our games townies that lied have led to great disasters. Townies shouldn't be trying to lie to deceive anyone because hey - thats exactly what the Mafia are doing! And using your last sentences if Judge is a Medic then WHY WOULD HE BE WANTING TO GET HIT. Because he isn't a Medic.
Did the last game have this rule set?
I don't think so. When I claimed DT last game I was essentially invulnerable except for the Mafia having the option of switching BGs. This game has no Mayor/Pardoners so that's out of the window. There is nothing to be gained from anyone claiming to be a Medic on Day 1. Ever.
Chances are he's Vet or Mafia. That's it. Doesn't even matter if he's plain red or GF. If he's red and he gets checked by the DT that means by Day 2 the DT is immediately outed in a game where the Mafia KP doesn't change based on Judge dying.
As for any other candidates no one else is even near as suspicious as Judge. Somehow Malongo is being talked about based on 1 post he threw out there when Judge has several and SHOULD be talked about even more. Where the hell is everyone else playing this game?
If he does have a plan there isn't any reason to wait an entire Day to tell us. This is really one of the big signs painting him as Mafia to me. There is no reason to hold back. Secondly we do not know if he's telling the truth because we can't confirm it. This is the same thing we go through every game where for some reason people assume someone must be telling the truth IF they have a plan.
When? In most of our games townies that lied have led to great disasters. Townies shouldn't be trying to lie to deceive anyone because hey - thats exactly what the Mafia are doing! And using your last sentences if Judge is a Medic then WHY WOULD HE BE WANTING TO GET HIT. Because he isn't a Medic.
Did the last game have this rule set?
I don't think so. When I claimed DT last game I was essentially invulnerable except for the Mafia having the option of switching BGs. This game has no Mayor/Pardoners so that's out of the window. There is nothing to be gained from anyone claiming to be a Medic on Day 1. Ever.
Chances are he's Vet or Mafia. That's it. Doesn't even matter if he's plain red or GF. If he's red and he gets checked by the DT that means by Day 2 the DT is immediately outed in a game where the Mafia KP doesn't change based on Judge dying.
As for any other candidates no one else is even near as suspicious as Judge. Somehow Malongo is being talked about based on 1 post he threw out there when Judge has several and SHOULD be talked about even more. Where the hell is everyone else playing this game?
+ Show Spoiler [13] +
On January 07 2010 07:37 Ace wrote:
no I'm lynching him because I think he is Mafia. I was using the way he was playing as an argument for why I think he indeed is Mafia ^_^
And yes I'm strongly opposed to Day 1 role claims in most formats.
no I'm lynching him because I think he is Mafia. I was using the way he was playing as an argument for why I think he indeed is Mafia ^_^
And yes I'm strongly opposed to Day 1 role claims in most formats.
+ Show Spoiler [14] +
On January 07 2010 08:59 Ace wrote:
Last game I could be invincible. What are you talking about? lol have you forgotten already? It doesn't matter if you think he's a GF. The point is no one claims medic on Day 1. It's seriously a dumb move. It's like 4 pooling on an island map. There is nothing to gain. And this hey let's wait and see his plan along with this I can't tell you guys what my plan is mentality is screaming Mafia. And to top it all off now we want to lynch Malongo based on nothing? lol right. You guys are making PERFECT sense here.
Answer me on how we are going to confirm judge is a medic.
Last game I could be invincible. What are you talking about? lol have you forgotten already? It doesn't matter if you think he's a GF. The point is no one claims medic on Day 1. It's seriously a dumb move. It's like 4 pooling on an island map. There is nothing to gain. And this hey let's wait and see his plan along with this I can't tell you guys what my plan is mentality is screaming Mafia. And to top it all off now we want to lynch Malongo based on nothing? lol right. You guys are making PERFECT sense here.
Answer me on how we are going to confirm judge is a medic.
+ Show Spoiler [15] +
On January 07 2010 09:17 Ace wrote:
Interesting. So Malongo who was fucking randomly plucked out of no where for doing nothing wrong is all of a sudden about to die?
Really smart guys. Just look at that wagon go.
Interesting. So Malongo who was fucking randomly plucked out of no where for doing nothing wrong is all of a sudden about to die?
Really smart guys. Just look at that wagon go.
+ Show Spoiler [16] +
On January 07 2010 09:23 Ace wrote:
you must be a salesman in real life
you must be a salesman in real life
+ Show Spoiler [17] +
On January 07 2010 09:43 Ace wrote:
Judge I always try to stop the town from killing people with random bandwagons. That's not a scum tell that's an ACE tell. That's probably the one trait that you can find I do consistently every game.
Oh and argue with RoL too.
Judge I always try to stop the town from killing people with random bandwagons. That's not a scum tell that's an ACE tell. That's probably the one trait that you can find I do consistently every game.
Oh and argue with RoL too.
+ Show Spoiler [18] +
On January 07 2010 09:45 Ace wrote:
Does him being blue even matter? He hasn't done anything suspicious at all.
And I don't have an argument for anyone else. Seriously Judge is the only person that seems suspect to me.
Does him being blue even matter? He hasn't done anything suspicious at all.
And I don't have an argument for anyone else. Seriously Judge is the only person that seems suspect to me.
+ Show Spoiler [19] +
On January 07 2010 09:46 Ace wrote:
why would I want RoL killed again?
How is him echoing me even relevant?
:/
why would I want RoL killed again?
How is him echoing me even relevant?
:/
+ Show Spoiler [20] +
On January 07 2010 09:49 Ace wrote:
how is stopping a bandwagon anti-town? You'll have to explain that one to me. I've done it every game regardless of what role I've had so you can't call it a tell.
The second part was sarcasm.
L I'm not switching to RoL unless there's a really convincing argument.
how is stopping a bandwagon anti-town? You'll have to explain that one to me. I've done it every game regardless of what role I've had so you can't call it a tell.
The second part was sarcasm.
L I'm not switching to RoL unless there's a really convincing argument.
+ Show Spoiler [21] +
On January 07 2010 09:52 Ace wrote:
I can see just fine. Someone claims to be a Medic Day 1 and I'm supposed to just sit back and be like omg fine!
Right Judge. Right ^_^
I can see just fine. Someone claims to be a Medic Day 1 and I'm supposed to just sit back and be like omg fine!
Right Judge. Right ^_^
+ Show Spoiler [22] +
On January 07 2010 09:55 Ace wrote:
@L: The only person I'd want to see die is Judge.
@Judge: You forgot the other part: Is a townie trying to stop the town from lynching a player with no cause. You can read the game where I think BC almost got MikeyMoo lynched and I stuck my neck out to save him. Both of us were innocent.
@L: The only person I'd want to see die is Judge.
@Judge: You forgot the other part: Is a townie trying to stop the town from lynching a player with no cause. You can read the game where I think BC almost got MikeyMoo lynched and I stuck my neck out to save him. Both of us were innocent.
+ Show Spoiler [23] +
On January 07 2010 10:01 Ace wrote:
indeed L.
Except I didn't pick because neither of them seem more fishy to me than Judge.
indeed L.
Except I didn't pick because neither of them seem more fishy to me than Judge.
+ Show Spoiler [24] +
On January 07 2010 10:02 Ace wrote:
I've done it more than once. I do it ALL THE TIME.
If you want we can pause the discussion and make a poll. You can also PM everyone that has played past Mafia games. They'll all tell you I stop town bandwagons from killing innocents regardless of my role.
I've done it more than once. I do it ALL THE TIME.
If you want we can pause the discussion and make a poll. You can also PM everyone that has played past Mafia games. They'll all tell you I stop town bandwagons from killing innocents regardless of my role.
+ Show Spoiler [25] +
On January 07 2010 10:08 Ace wrote:
But you made it sound earlier that defending innocents is a Mafia trait when I just proved to you that it is not. Hence why I called you out on it. You can't say me defending Malongo makes one or both of us scummy. There is no hole in my logic because I already admitted I do it regardless of my role.
But you made it sound earlier that defending innocents is a Mafia trait when I just proved to you that it is not. Hence why I called you out on it. You can't say me defending Malongo makes one or both of us scummy. There is no hole in my logic because I already admitted I do it regardless of my role.
+ Show Spoiler [26] +
On January 07 2010 10:14 Ace wrote:
thats nice Judge. But like I've said before you shouldn't be surprised I'm not going for fake Medic claims.
thats nice Judge. But like I've said before you shouldn't be surprised I'm not going for fake Medic claims.
+ Show Spoiler [27] +
On January 07 2010 10:22 Ace wrote:
L if you're concerned about RoL why isn't anyone else voting for him? (besides me of course)
L if you're concerned about RoL why isn't anyone else voting for him? (besides me of course)
+ Show Spoiler [28] +
On January 07 2010 10:32 Ace wrote:
That voting thread sure is something else.
That voting thread sure is something else.
+ Show Spoiler [29] +
On January 07 2010 10:48 Ace wrote:
I know L is laughing very hard right now
I know L is laughing very hard right now
+ Show Spoiler [30] +
On January 07 2010 11:45 Ace wrote:
stop grasping at straws. I haven't even spoken to Chezinu all game.
stop grasping at straws. I haven't even spoken to Chezinu all game.
+ Show Spoiler [31] +
On January 07 2010 12:48 Ace wrote:
?
are you serious?
so you just flip flop voted multiple times, and now if Malongo dies and flips innocent you can say he had a chance to "save himself". lol interesting really.
?
are you serious?
so you just flip flop voted multiple times, and now if Malongo dies and flips innocent you can say he had a chance to "save himself". lol interesting really.
+ Show Spoiler [32] +
+ Show Spoiler [33] +
On January 07 2010 13:09 Ace wrote:
I said this a few pages back. DT/Medic is also somewhat busted by GF roles, but only somewhat.
And the reason you need DT/Medic is because without both Mafia is just going to run wild killing everyone and people will be scared to post knowing they have no protection.
I said this a few pages back. DT/Medic is also somewhat busted by GF roles, but only somewhat.
And the reason you need DT/Medic is because without both Mafia is just going to run wild killing everyone and people will be scared to post knowing they have no protection.
+ Show Spoiler [34] +
+ Show Spoiler [35] +
On January 07 2010 13:18 Ace wrote:
Not at all. More like the random out of the blue bandwagon that you guys put on Malongo was the wrong call.
Not at all. More like the random out of the blue bandwagon that you guys put on Malongo was the wrong call.
+ Show Spoiler [36] +
On January 07 2010 13:25 Ace wrote:
I don't. 5 out of 12 possible votes and not one of them Mafia? I highly doubt it.
Either way I'm going to start going back through this whole debacle. But right now my top suspects:
Judge, obviously ^_^
Scamp and Chezinu because of the last minute voting and flip flopping
Zato-1 because he was the one who proposed lynching Malongo in the midst of the Judge debacle
I don't. 5 out of 12 possible votes and not one of them Mafia? I highly doubt it.
Either way I'm going to start going back through this whole debacle. But right now my top suspects:
Judge, obviously ^_^
Scamp and Chezinu because of the last minute voting and flip flopping
Zato-1 because he was the one who proposed lynching Malongo in the midst of the Judge debacle
+ Show Spoiler [37] +
On January 07 2010 13:37 Ace wrote:
I'd actually rather we have had a no lynch. I was already against the Malongo band wagon from jump and since he didn't really do much his death wasn't going to reveal anything major. Well now that he's dead everyone that voted for him is rightfully going to be questioned.
I'd actually rather we have had a no lynch. I was already against the Malongo band wagon from jump and since he didn't really do much his death wasn't going to reveal anything major. Well now that he's dead everyone that voted for him is rightfully going to be questioned.
+ Show Spoiler [38] +
On January 08 2010 09:40 Ace wrote:
I like how a long time before that I said killing malongo was a bandwagon move and we should have just killed Judge instead. It's ok though, if I survive tonight there's going to be hell on Day 2.
I like how a long time before that I said killing malongo was a bandwagon move and we should have just killed Judge instead. It's ok though, if I survive tonight there's going to be hell on Day 2.
+ Show Spoiler [39] +
On January 08 2010 10:14 Ace wrote:
The bandwagon at Judge was very justified: A guy claiming medic on day with a "wait and let me live" approach vs a guy who got one of his posts randomly plucked out of no where and accused.
Yes, the votes against Judge were so unjustified. Either way Day 2 someone is going to have to answer some tough questions.
The bandwagon at Judge was very justified: A guy claiming medic on day with a "wait and let me live" approach vs a guy who got one of his posts randomly plucked out of no where and accused.
Yes, the votes against Judge were so unjustified. Either way Day 2 someone is going to have to answer some tough questions.
+ Show Spoiler [40] +
On January 08 2010 10:28 Ace wrote:
I didn't want to lynch you. L said because you're a bad player you should be lynched. I said because Judge was lying and because he made a bad play he should be lynched. They both kept their votes on Malongo. L said I should switch my votes to you and I flat out told him that wasn't going to happen.
The game I claimed DT L said it was a terrible play. Judge claims Medic Day 1 and L says no, no way a Mafia would do that. Seriously L, why the double standard?
I didn't want to lynch you. L said because you're a bad player you should be lynched. I said because Judge was lying and because he made a bad play he should be lynched. They both kept their votes on Malongo. L said I should switch my votes to you and I flat out told him that wasn't going to happen.
The game I claimed DT L said it was a terrible play. Judge claims Medic Day 1 and L says no, no way a Mafia would do that. Seriously L, why the double standard?
+ Show Spoiler [41] +
On January 08 2010 11:31 Ace wrote:
What town plan? You mean the one after I died that everyone conveniently decided not to follow? There wasn't a town plan unless you mean the stupidity you tried to sell the town on.
And I didn't want everyone to claim to me. I asked for BG information which when I died made sense.
Judge's request of don't kill him shouldn't be held in higher regards than anyone else begging not to die (see Malongo).
So you're wrong on what I did last game and you still haven't even given good reasoning as to why Judge should have been blindly trusted in the first place. But it's ok, all this pales in comparison to what Zato-1 is going to go through.
What town plan? You mean the one after I died that everyone conveniently decided not to follow? There wasn't a town plan unless you mean the stupidity you tried to sell the town on.
And I didn't want everyone to claim to me. I asked for BG information which when I died made sense.
Judge's request of don't kill him shouldn't be held in higher regards than anyone else begging not to die (see Malongo).
So you're wrong on what I did last game and you still haven't even given good reasoning as to why Judge should have been blindly trusted in the first place. But it's ok, all this pales in comparison to what Zato-1 is going to go through.
+ Show Spoiler [42] +
On January 08 2010 12:04 Ace wrote:
more leadership? lol nice I didn't even know I was a leader yet. The 5 of you that voted malongo off are all top suspects. Especially when ya know, you were the one who started the bs bandwagon and the others hopped on to it with lame excuses.
more leadership? lol nice I didn't even know I was a leader yet. The 5 of you that voted malongo off are all top suspects. Especially when ya know, you were the one who started the bs bandwagon and the others hopped on to it with lame excuses.
+ Show Spoiler [43] +
On January 08 2010 20:51 Ace wrote:
this is all interesting. I guess tomorrow I'll have to make a long post about Zato-1, Judge, MM and Chezinu.
However at this point Chez I'm pretty sure you know you're like, almost guaranteed a lynch (seriously after seeing judge RC the first day and take shit, you'd have to AT LEAST be able to find a way to convince people). Also the other reason I don't really believe you is because on the Day 1 vote you flip flopped so many times that you came off as Mafia. Seriously, why would you flip flop if you wanted to save Malongo or Judge? Just abstain if that's the case.
And yea I read your PM Chezinu, but I'm not helping you get MikeyMoo killed unless you really flip DT. Either way it's really funny how every single time someone is "on the radar" ANOTHER person comes from left field with some new info and knocks shit out of whack.
After the Chezinu/MM debacle is cleared up we'll move on to past transgressions.
this is all interesting. I guess tomorrow I'll have to make a long post about Zato-1, Judge, MM and Chezinu.
However at this point Chez I'm pretty sure you know you're like, almost guaranteed a lynch (seriously after seeing judge RC the first day and take shit, you'd have to AT LEAST be able to find a way to convince people). Also the other reason I don't really believe you is because on the Day 1 vote you flip flopped so many times that you came off as Mafia. Seriously, why would you flip flop if you wanted to save Malongo or Judge? Just abstain if that's the case.
And yea I read your PM Chezinu, but I'm not helping you get MikeyMoo killed unless you really flip DT. Either way it's really funny how every single time someone is "on the radar" ANOTHER person comes from left field with some new info and knocks shit out of whack.
After the Chezinu/MM debacle is cleared up we'll move on to past transgressions.
+ Show Spoiler [44] +
On January 08 2010 21:21 Ace wrote:
WHY DID YOU ROLECLAIM!?
WHY DID YOU ROLECLAIM!?
+ Show Spoiler [45] +
On January 08 2010 22:04 Ace wrote:
Yea I was (still am) outraged at you. But there was no need to role claim. I mean seriously, is everyone going to roleclaim now when we have a GF in the game? Come on man, you just saw Chez and his nonsense. I don't even think you would have gotten put on the chopping block today since chez just pulled that stunt and that path gives us a faster way to finding Mafia.
Yea I was (still am) outraged at you. But there was no need to role claim. I mean seriously, is everyone going to roleclaim now when we have a GF in the game? Come on man, you just saw Chez and his nonsense. I don't even think you would have gotten put on the chopping block today since chez just pulled that stunt and that path gives us a faster way to finding Mafia.
+ Show Spoiler [46] +
On January 08 2010 22:06 Ace wrote:
how many times do I have to tell you if you didn't pull that stupid voting stunt on Day 1 I would have been more inclined to believe you? You said you didn't want to kill Judge or Malongo, told them to save themselves yet kept your vote flip flopping instead of simply abstaining. If you saw someone do that do you honestly think you'd believe they were legit?
how many times do I have to tell you if you didn't pull that stupid voting stunt on Day 1 I would have been more inclined to believe you? You said you didn't want to kill Judge or Malongo, told them to save themselves yet kept your vote flip flopping instead of simply abstaining. If you saw someone do that do you honestly think you'd believe they were legit?
+ Show Spoiler [47] +
On January 09 2010 05:07 Ace wrote:
Vigi isn't exactly easy to confirm, check the rules ^_^
But either way it only looks bad because Chezinu DT claimed first. No point in mass roleclaims on the Second Day of the game when there isn't even anything to panic about.
Vigi isn't exactly easy to confirm, check the rules ^_^
But either way it only looks bad because Chezinu DT claimed first. No point in mass roleclaims on the Second Day of the game when there isn't even anything to panic about.
+ Show Spoiler [48] +
On January 09 2010 14:30 Ace wrote:
Because Judge can't be confirmed. They've been giving us this runaround for 2 days and get upset when we ask for it and we're the ones being labeled as irrational.
I'll try and make a post before I get out of here tonight, but Chez should definitely be lynched first unless we all come to the consensus MM is definitely scum. At this point it's one guy's word against the other and Chez's play before he claimed was scummy. And like I said before if he didn't do that I would have believed him.
As for Judge being town I still don't believe that. Zato-1 on the other hand I do believe.
Because Judge can't be confirmed. They've been giving us this runaround for 2 days and get upset when we ask for it and we're the ones being labeled as irrational.
I'll try and make a post before I get out of here tonight, but Chez should definitely be lynched first unless we all come to the consensus MM is definitely scum. At this point it's one guy's word against the other and Chez's play before he claimed was scummy. And like I said before if he didn't do that I would have believed him.
As for Judge being town I still don't believe that. Zato-1 on the other hand I do believe.
+ Show Spoiler [49] +
On January 09 2010 14:35 Ace wrote:
I'm active enough? Seriously though I've been in meetings and shit. And tomorrow from 12-9 ET (cringe) I'll be tutoring kids. Hopefully they let me use the internet.
I'm active enough? Seriously though I've been in meetings and shit. And tomorrow from 12-9 ET (cringe) I'll be tutoring kids. Hopefully they let me use the internet.
+ Show Spoiler [50] +
On January 09 2010 14:40 Ace wrote:
You've told me I'm Mafia about 7 times already. But you can keep screaming it for your own pleasure ^_^
You've told me I'm Mafia about 7 times already. But you can keep screaming it for your own pleasure ^_^
+ Show Spoiler [51] +
On January 09 2010 15:53 Ace wrote:
Ok I understand why you're for killing MM...but how does that confirm Judge or even L?
Ok I understand why you're for killing MM...but how does that confirm Judge or even L?
+ Show Spoiler [52] +
On January 09 2010 20:30 Ace wrote:
Oh...oh my god! Brilliant!
Surely the DT wouldn't think that the fact you purposely claimed Medic to draw an investigation to yourself and a GF isn't in the game you'd never even attempt to pull a stunt!
So basically like I said the instant you "came up with such a brilliant plan" you were just lying and wasting everyone's time.
Oh...oh my god! Brilliant!
Surely the DT wouldn't think that the fact you purposely claimed Medic to draw an investigation to yourself and a GF isn't in the game you'd never even attempt to pull a stunt!
So basically like I said the instant you "came up with such a brilliant plan" you were just lying and wasting everyone's time.
Yeah, that's a lot of posts alright. But, I've done some work and categorized them for you again:
Chaff posts where he makes comments and maybe triest to set a mood or give an idea of his thoughts: Posts #1 through 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51 and 52.
Posts with content:
Posts #34, 36, 37, 38, 42 and 43 are essentially guilt trips; someone did a mistake, and he's calling them out on it. Posts #8, 13, 15, 18, 23 and 39 are posts in which he justifies attempts to lynch Judge for his day 1 roleclaiming.
Now for the analysis:
- There's nothing suspicious about making Chaff posts. Everyone makes them, some more than others.
- Guilt Trip posts are of a different kind; when the Town makes a mistake, instead of trying to pick up the broken pieces and move on to the next course of action, Ace focuses on kicking the parties responsible for the mistake while they're down. This is done to lower Town morale and attempt to make Town players bitter, and recriminate themselves about who's responsible for what- while he sits back and watches.
- His posts against Judge are probably just the fact that his dislike for day 1 roleclaiming happened to coincide with a daring Town initiative for getting organized. Two birds with one stone there (personal satisfaction & lynching a potential Town organizer), and he can just blame his zeal against day 1 roleclaiming for persecuting Judge.
- What seems to be the connecting trend between Ace's posts? The only thing he's actually committed to, was persecuting Judge, and for a pretty bad reason at that ("I think he's lying about being a Medic, so he has to be mafia"). Other than that, he's content to sit back, make a lot of posts with little substance, and punish Town members when they make a wrong call. Does this seem like a game-winning plan for Town to you? 'cause it looks a lot more like a mafia trying to sow dissent among the Town while appearing to be active, to me.
For this reason, tonight I am going to kill Ace.
I have actually thought this for a while. I hope you are right. I thought the GF was either L, Ace, or Judge. Which is why I thought Judge was a good target for Day 1, it made things a lot less confusing down the road.