EPTOlympic Football Thread! - Page 19
| Forum Index > London Olympics |
|
Wampaibist
United States478 Posts
| ||
|
Bandino
United States342 Posts
| ||
|
gape.ninja
Japan249 Posts
| ||
|
JoeSchmoe
Canada2058 Posts
| ||
|
sorrowptoss
Canada1431 Posts
Must stupid and ridiculous 3rd goal by the USA. Referee's call was just plain stupid. And what the hell is a indirect free kick inside the penalty box anyways? Sigh... Besides that complain, the game is fun. A lot of goals and big plays. Sinclair hat-trick ! | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
| ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote: wow if I was Canada id be really upset this reffing is getting a bit silly. And it doesnt seem biased, its just incompetent. Impressive crowd, pretty intelligent to. I almost guarantee they will lodge a complaint about the reffing after the game. There have even been a few calls that should have gone US way but didnt. But giving an indirect free kick inside the box is probably the most absurd call I've ever seen. Then giving a handball off it that late basically a gift. Game has been really good otherwise. | ||
|
dae
Canada1600 Posts
The ONLY reason Canada hasn't won the game already is because of complete bullshit call after call by the refs. | ||
|
JoeSchmoe
Canada2058 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/8AjON.png) bullshit | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:35 Darpa wrote: I almost guarantee they will lodge a complaint about the reffing after the game. There have even been a few calls that should have gone US way but didnt. But giving an indirect free kick inside the box is probably the most absurd call I've ever seen. Then giving a handball off it that late basically a gift. Game has been really good otherwise. Well she has to give the freekick because the keeper didnt release it from her hands in time. You can get away with that if you put it down, that was a pretty elementary mistake. But the Pen was just garbage. | ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:39 Rebs wrote: Well she has to give the freekick because the keeper didnt release it from her hands in time. You can get away with that if you put it down, that was a pretty elementary mistake. But the Pen was just garbage. That wasnt even the call. The call was delay of game or something | ||
|
Wampaibist
United States478 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:38 JoeSchmoe wrote: bullshit It is bullshit but take a screenshot where the ref was its so hard to see everything. If i was canada I would be upset with the calls but the play in the game has been so extraordinary. | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:50 Wampaibist wrote: It is bullshit but take a screenshot where the ref was its so hard to see everything. If i was canada I would be upset with the calls but the play in the game has been so extraordinary. there aren't 5refs ? /e apparently not still they're normally really good to judge those things and it's really clear here. | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:49 Darpa wrote: That wasnt even the call. The call was delay of game or something yes and delay of game happened because she was holding on to the ball to long. Wasting time is fine, everyone does it but you push the rules to do it. Not break them :p. (example you drop the ball to your feet you squeeze an extra few seconds out) Ususally they are pretty lenient about it the first few times its done and then they just card the keeper if its to much and you just restart. But they can certainly give that indirect free kick if they want, its rare to see though. Personally I dont mind it, the mens game could use some of that. Also no one is going to lodge any complaints. Its bad reffing but there have been far worse travesties. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32111 Posts
also MURICA | ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:57 Rebs wrote: yes and delay of game happened because she was holding on to the ball to long. Wasting time is fine, everyone does it but you push the rules to do it. Not break them :p. (example you drop the ball to your feet you squeeze an extra few seconds out) Ususally they are pretty lenient about it the first few times its done and then they just card the keeper if its to much and you just restart. But they can certainly give that indirect free kick if they want, its rare to see though. Personally I dont mind it, the mens game could use some of that. Also no one is going to lodge any complaints. Its bad reffing but there have been far worse travesties. ummm you almost never see or give a free kick inside the box... especially in an elimination game at 75 Minutes. | ||
|
samw
England443 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32111 Posts
| ||
|
samw
England443 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:04 Darpa wrote: ummm you almost never see or give a free kick inside the box... especially in an elimination game at 75 Minutes. Not really, maybe not for that particular offense. Mostly because keepers arent dumb enough to get caught doing it. But indirect free kicks inside the box occur often enough. | ||
| ||
