EPT[IPL] IPL4 Main Event Discussion - Page 79
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
| ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
CLG's game are always super boring, not comment about their skill though | ||
|
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:20 StUfF wrote: Just wanted a last word in this to inform. Rather than argue with totally unrelevant anecdotes. (East Coast to West Europe / UK to LA) You could simply just actually you know test it. Go to one of the websites here http://www.traceroute.org/#Russia Take an IP address from LA/Riot. e.g. 208.79.89.243 And you get an average off 200~ping. Keep in mind that these services will probably have 2-4 hops less than the average user in their home and there's alot more traffic/packets going on for a game of LoL and take into account server latency then I can easily see 250+ in-game latency. If your "friends" are getting sub 100 pings then they must be using some kind of tunneling tool to optimise traffic/increase QoS on their traffic, otherwise over regular internet I can't see how that would be possible that UK and Russia have the exact same pings - it's just not logical? The "~" was meant to mean difference or fluctuation, not getting 100 steady ping, just something in the 100's. Maybe im right, maybe im wrong, who cares. The only thing i was pointing out is saying "m5 lost because they have 350 ping" when theres really nothing to say they had that apart from guesstimates is silly. Yes, its possible they have 350ping, its also possible they have under 200, There is evidence of both being possible. M5 didnt come out and say "we had X ping" and it isnt a 100% that your getting giant 300+ ping from russia to LA. Why put a teams loss on guesswork, makes them look cheap imo, excuses with no proof and all I really didnt mean for some minor comment to blow up :-D And apparently a discussion is classed as "a stupid unrelated arguement" so, lets stop! | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:27 emucxg wrote: I would like to watch TSM-Curse, whats wrong with u guys >.< CLG's game are always super boring, not comment about their skill though What you mean super boring? CLG games are the only games that are guaranteed to be close. Most other games are one team gets way ahead and just wins, or one team gets way ahead and has does some big throws. | ||
|
daSilvaz
809 Posts
| ||
|
Pinith
651 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:26 beefhamburger wrote: Because Curse hasn't had a televised game yet. It would be such a dick move to them if they were never aired today. With this many viewers it makes no sense not to air both winner's bracket semifinal matches | ||
|
Highwayman
United States181 Posts
| ||
|
StUfF
Australia1437 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:28 Capped wrote: The "~" was meant to mean difference or fluctuation, not getting 100 steady ping, just something in the 100's. Maybe im right, maybe im wrong, who cares. The only thing i was pointing out is saying "m5 lost because they have 350 ping" when theres really nothing to say they had that apart from guesstimates is silly. Yes, its possible they have 350ping, its also possible they have under 200, There is evidence of both being possible. M5 didnt come out and say "we had X ping" and it isnt a 100% that your getting giant 300+ ping from russia to LA. Why put a teams loss on guesswork. I really didnt mean for some minor comment to blow up :-D And apparently a discussion is classed as "a stupid unrelated arguement" so, lets stop! Ping usually doesn't fluctuate so badly unless you're doing something stupid on your own connection (but that only goes up), but if your friends know some sort of super secret please let me know. Playing from Australia with minimum 250 ping is terrible =/ | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:30 daSilvaz wrote: Didnt think i could dislike a caster more than gretorp.....boy how was i wrong HOOOOOOOO My poor ears. | ||
|
BlackMagister
United States5834 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:29 iCanada wrote: What you mean super boring? CLG games are the only games that are guaranteed to be close. Most other games are one team gets way ahead and just wins, or one team gets way ahead and has does some big throws. Eh super close does not mean exciting. I would like to see CLG vs Dig too, but you can't deny that the CLG games can end up being just farm offs like their game 1. Not to mention yeah Curse needs to have a televised match. I like Curse's ban. Kog Maw is beastly. Galio is a good counter to double AP and strong and general. Dyrus pretty good Olaf. | ||
|
Zhiroo
Kosovo2724 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
emraaa
Germany505 Posts
| ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
| ||
|
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:31 StUfF wrote: Ping usually doesn't fluctuate so badly unless you're doing something stupid on your own connection (but that only goes up), but if your friends know some sort of super secret please let me know. Playing from Australia with minimum 250 ping is terrible =/ Lol i didnt pry so much into their methods just take their word as it doesnt matter so much to me :D and i didnt mean it would be shooting around everywhere, only it wouldnt be 100, maybe 140, 170, 190ish, something like that. Ugh my english seems bad, i get misunderstood alot xD. | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
| ||
|
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:33 wei2coolman wrote: YES!!!!! KAYLE IS IN IT!!!!! <3 kayle. so amazing. YES. YES YES YES YES YES. BETTER JUNGLE WITH HER. They ran Kayle/Nunu bot lane last time. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
| ||
|
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
On April 07 2012 09:35 phyvo wrote: To force a WTF reaction.IDK why people pick weird things like Kayle first. It's not like TSM was going to pick Kayle. All this does is give TSM the opportunity to counterpick. Am I missing something? | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
| ||
