|
|
On April 07 2012 04:26 Pudge_172 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2012 04:24 Shikyo wrote:On April 07 2012 04:22 Pudge_172 wrote:On April 07 2012 04:19 jpak wrote:
35.7k for SC2
114.4k for LoL. I'm watching LoL but you have to figure 5 per team auto means more viewers for LoL. 114.4/5=22.8k So one could argue more "teams" watching SC2 than LoL. Again, I'm watching LoL not SC2 so don't hate on me.... That's a very bad troll o_o Not a troll. I'm watching LoL not SC2. I prefer LoL over SC2. A team in SC2 is one person, A team in LoL is 5 people. So technically more "teams" are watching SC2 than LoL. However, eyeballs are what sponsors care about so LoL is clearly winning in eyeballs 228K vs 71k
You're derailing the thread, not the time or place for that discussing those numbers by that reasoning
|
On April 07 2012 04:28 Matsumoto wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2012 04:26 Pudge_172 wrote:On April 07 2012 04:24 Shikyo wrote:On April 07 2012 04:22 Pudge_172 wrote:On April 07 2012 04:19 jpak wrote:
35.7k for SC2
114.4k for LoL. I'm watching LoL but you have to figure 5 per team auto means more viewers for LoL. 114.4/5=22.8k So one could argue more "teams" watching SC2 than LoL. Again, I'm watching LoL not SC2 so don't hate on me.... That's a very bad troll o_o Not a troll. I'm watching LoL not SC2. I prefer LoL over SC2. A team in SC2 is one person, A team in LoL is 5 people. So technically more "teams" are watching SC2 than LoL. However, eyeballs are what sponsors care about so LoL is clearly winning in eyeballs 228K vs 71k im honestly trying hard to understand his argument,but i cant.what does he mean?
that's a flame bait and you don't need to understand it, because it's obviously super-stupid.
|
On April 07 2012 04:28 Matsumoto wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2012 04:26 Pudge_172 wrote:On April 07 2012 04:24 Shikyo wrote:On April 07 2012 04:22 Pudge_172 wrote:On April 07 2012 04:19 jpak wrote:
35.7k for SC2
114.4k for LoL. I'm watching LoL but you have to figure 5 per team auto means more viewers for LoL. 114.4/5=22.8k So one could argue more "teams" watching SC2 than LoL. Again, I'm watching LoL not SC2 so don't hate on me.... That's a very bad troll o_o Not a troll. I'm watching LoL not SC2. I prefer LoL over SC2. A team in SC2 is one person, A team in LoL is 5 people. So technically more "teams" are watching SC2 than LoL. However, eyeballs are what sponsors care about so LoL is clearly winning in eyeballs 228K vs 71k im honestly trying hard to understand his argument,but i cant.what does he mean?
That SC2 is a one-man game and LoL is a 5-man team game?
|
|
|
|
|
'cause nothing laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasts
|
Curse vs Epik 2-0
according to xpecial
|
|
|
On April 07 2012 04:29 Craton wrote:
'cause nothing laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasts
sojin so gewd
|
LoL and kpop.
It's like I'm at Boesthius' stream. :D
|
as much as i like kpop... it's really weird to see it on a foreign event
|
|
|
Yaya!
Foriegn eSports has Kpop now too.
^_^
|
fucking K-pop, the cancer that ate away at BW.
don't fall for it LoL fans!
|
What great kpop taste. -__-;
|
Western tournaments really have to figure out a better filler to use than kpop.
|
It totally is not flame bait.
What is so hard to understand that it takes 10 people to play one game of LoL and it takes 2 people to play one game of SC2.
I PLAY LoL. I WATCH LoL.
|
On April 07 2012 04:31 Slow Motion wrote:
fucking K-pop, the cancer that ate away at BW.
don't fall for it LoL fans!
h4h4h4
you shall never escape the kpop
|
100k western people watching kpop right now :D
|
On April 07 2012 04:31 Slow Motion wrote:
fucking K-pop, the cancer that ate away at BW.
don't fall for it LoL fans!
i lol'd at this sadly it's kinda true though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
