| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
On February 25 2015 07:08 Slusher wrote: I don't know if there is a combination of teams t8 would have on their schedule where I would ever consider Slooshi over those other 2 Well they're all within 10 total pts scored so far this split (within 1pt avg) so it's not that crazy  | ||
|
EsanLOL
479 Posts
For Edward/Lemon/Krepo, I'd go Edward, Gambit has a soft schedule as well (I could see CW VS GMB being another long, sloppy game with lots of fighting). Lemon has been a poor point scorer, Krepo is too risky. | ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
| ||
|
DNeon
Australia203 Posts
| ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
link just needs to score 25 more points than TSM he's against fenix it's still possible on that note, all supports available are trash (xept vander you're my man, but youre not worth points sorry) so I guess I'm functionally 6v7 every week now | ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
Also who told me slooshi vs keane was a no brainer -_- | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
On March 02 2015 06:53 Dandel Ion wrote: he might! link just needs to score 25 more points than TSM he's against fenix it's still possible on that note, all supports available are trash (xept vander you're my man, but youre not worth points sorry) so I guess I'm functionally 6v7 every week now I mean my bench is basically the guys that aren't good, but are still better than whatever's available. I wouldn't normally keep Hai nor Lemon save for good weeks like this one. I had Betsy on the bench iirc and let him go, man what a moron, hoping he wouldn't get grabbed in the two days my roster was locked. Going all-in on Gambit at this point though pretty much, so... And I'm gonna lose despite 3rd best score, unless CoreJJ scores 30 points by himself against T8, as Ezreal. HA! Not gonna happen. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
| ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
Also quality of the team doesn't matter, it's how much they want to fight and how long their average game time is. | ||
|
RagequitBM
Canada2270 Posts
On March 06 2015 01:29 AlterKot wrote: If you mean our league then I don't have any Fnatic members, did you confuse them with also-yellow-colored Wolves? Also quality of the team doesn't matter, it's how much they want to fight and how long their average game time is. Also if you're losing it's almost guaranteed you get low point counts (unless you're fnatic). That's a big issue with LoL fantasy I think. In traditional sports even when you lose, you can still get many points, in LoL if you're losing, your score is probably going to suck too. | ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On March 08 2015 14:12 RagequitBM wrote: Also if you're losing it's almost guaranteed you get low point counts (unless you're fnatic). That's a big issue with LoL fantasy I think. In traditional sports even when you lose, you can still get many points, in LoL if you're losing, your score is probably going to suck too. Lolno, that's why you aim for teams who play long games, because even in losses, they get more than teams like C9. But then again, what is "many points" in LoL fantasy? 30 per week for each player? 40? 50? | ||
|
Prog
United Kingdom1470 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Safe House 2
Monday Night Weeklies
WardiTV Invitational
WardiTV Invitational
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Online Event
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
