|
Imo insta death penalty. These creatures should be destroyed.
Ps to echo the points already said, this is the probably worst gore/snuff video out there
Ps these people really have no human rights left imo. Also, there is no way it can be doubted they did this. When you have violence like this filmed as 100% evidence of brutal sadistic murder, the perpetrators SHOULD be destroyed quickly after a short trial. The only thing that is needed is psychiatric profiling, but in anything but the most mental derangement there should be death sentence coming up every time. No money should be expended in keeping these creatures alive, they are anti-human and against us all.
|
On December 23 2008 04:55 Lefnui wrote:Show nested quote +On December 22 2008 14:26 HeadBangaa wrote:
NOW DO YOU BELIEVE IN THE DEATH PENALTY? HOLY SHIT, FUCK THE JUSTICE SYSTEM I'LL DO IT MYSELF You want to torture people according to your own standards while ignoring law and morals? Sounds exactly like what they did.
That's exceedingly retarded. You're exceedingly retarded. The whole damn system is EXCEEDINGLY retarded!
|
It costs more to kill a person than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life.
|
If those are as crazy as their names..... holy crap...
|
On December 23 2008 06:15 Cloud wrote:
It costs more to kill a person than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life.
For your sake I hope you're kidding.
|
On December 23 2008 06:15 Cloud wrote:
It costs more to kill a person than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life.
Nope, it costs more to hold a guy in death row for 10 years with unlimited appeals and force special jury time in the court case and demand more investigation from police detectives than slip them into a prison for 25 years; but to simply kill a man via lethal injection costs something like 1000 dollars. The American death sentence system is very expensive because too many people are put up for the death penalty. I think only people like this should be destroyed, and that would cost far less, probably 4 or 5 times less than keeping them alive would. Give them a short trial, and don't let them appeal. Much much cheaper and it gets rid of these creatures which would kill any one of us or our families without any rationale or provocation.
It's a complicated situation and this over-quoted buzzphrase is seriously simplified and fundamentally inaccurate in this sort of a situation. In a one on one motivated murder, it's very difficult to get a cheap death sentence. In this sort of obvious serial killer situation, it SHOULD be easy.
|
Wow is it just me or did you just say "no it doesnt cost more but YES, it DOES COST MORE"
|
On December 23 2008 06:25 Lefnui wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2008 06:15 Cloud wrote:
It costs more to kill a person than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life. For your sake I hope you're kidding.
Actually there was a documentary in the U.S where it did cost a lot to "properly" kill someone. Like electricity bill or whatever, setting up dates... all that b.s
Or was it the other way around.. haha, I forgot.
NEVER MIND!!
But fuck those guys..
|
Well isn't this the best thread for christmas?
|
On December 23 2008 06:33 Cloud wrote:
Wow is it just me or did you just say "no it doesnt cost more but YES, it DOES COST MORE"
Just you. Don't try to miss the point. It costs a lot to execute people in the American justice system, but that is because execution is a punishment for quite a large range of offences. If the only people who could be executed were self-admitting, rational serial killers with no remorse, executing them would be severely cheaper, by a huge factor, than keeping them alive for the rest of their life.
|
On December 23 2008 06:41 BalliSLife wrote:
Well isn't this the best thread for christmas?
ruined my evening 
|
Too much talk.
Burn them one by one, alone on a fire and forget them. The same fire so that they may stand atop their friends corpse and then burn.
Do not let their last moments on earth be remotely peaceful or anything but pain.
It is times like this where I would wish for religion to be true and for hell to exist.
|
Jesus fucking christ..
I don't know what to say. Sick, twisted motherfuckers. I cannot begin to imagine why people would do that kinda shit.
I'm against torture, but geez, if anyone deserves it, let it be these guys. God fucking damn it, this is twisted.
RIP to all victims, and I hope the 'maniacs' get to rot in a dirty cell somewhere for all eternity.
|
United States10774 Posts
close this shit this thread ruins my holiday spirit
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On December 23 2008 06:26 HamerD wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2008 06:15 Cloud wrote:
It costs more to kill a person than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life. Nope, it costs more to hold a guy in death row for 10 years with unlimited appeals and force special jury time in the court case and demand more investigation from police detectives than slip them into a prison for 25 years; but to simply kill a man via lethal injection costs something like 1000 dollars. The American death sentence system is very expensive because too many people are put up for the death penalty. I think only people like this should be destroyed, and that would cost far less, probably 4 or 5 times less than keeping them alive would. Give them a short trial, and don't let them appeal. Much much cheaper and it gets rid of these creatures which would kill any one of us or our families without any rationale or provocation. It's a complicated situation and this over-quoted buzzphrase is seriously simplified and fundamentally inaccurate in this sort of a situation. In a one on one motivated murder, it's very difficult to get a cheap death sentence. In this sort of obvious serial killer situation, it SHOULD be easy.
I actually agree with this fully. TOO MANY people are put on death row. People like those discussed in the OP deserve death and nothing less imo.
In addition however: The discussion on "price" fucking bs and only comes up when the death penalty is being discussed. It isn't like western society gives a rat's ass about cost.. we spend money on the most ludicrous things on earth. Removing an obviously broken, dangerous creature from the planet is one of the only sensible things we could spend money on.
Too many people are getting all hippy and faggy on issues like this. Nature doesn't imprison flawed, dangerous living creatures that break the natural rule of things they get destroyed by their peers. These three boys are weak, sick and demented individuals. They broke the order of things and spread so much disguisting fear and violence the only answer is to wipe the slate clean with them and hope they come back as something less capable.
"slippery slope" and "the state shouldn't decide who lives and dies" bs is utopian garbage that needs a reality check.
|
On December 23 2008 06:43 HamerD wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2008 06:33 Cloud wrote:
Wow is it just me or did you just say "no it doesnt cost more but YES, it DOES COST MORE" Just you. Don't try to miss the point. It costs a lot to execute people in the American justice system, but that is because execution is a punishment for quite a large range of offences. If the only people who could be executed were self-admitting, rational serial killers with no remorse, executing them would be severely cheaper, by a huge factor, than keeping them alive for the rest of their life.
I thought that by legal definition a confession would actually help to reduce the sentence, but no, of course youre just limiting your sentence to people who you can be 100% certain they committed the crime so your poor consciense doesnt get in a moral dilemma, not to mention your "way" would make confessions the most retarded legal strategy ever.
Youre also assuming that just because you pay a little bit of money to the state, you are entitled to have "them" kill people you find repulsive or that you loathe. I mean maybe when executioners are a bunch of robots with complete disregard of human life. But despite what your idea of a good judicial system might be, some people wont just kill someone as soon as they learn hes guilty just because its written on a fucking book, much less to speed up the process and save you some bucks which can be better used in i dont know, killing terrorists?
Ps. testie stick to dota.
|
Reality check of what incontrol? If you dont kill them and instead have them holed for life they will hunt you in your sleep or something? What the hell is the point of killing or even torturing someone if theres such an alternative?
|
Torturing them is irrelevant these clearly mentally ill people cannot live among other humans, so just take their lives, the method is also irrelevant.
Pain will not do any good or wrong to them in any way, these are emotionless sociopaths, kill them and donate their useless bodies to science so they atleast pay a tiny bit back to society.
|
btw that video should be the new RickRoll !!!!
- "OMG i wanna see Jessica Alba's porno video!"
*clicks
- bam!!! your soul is dead now.
|
On December 23 2008 06:59 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
Too many people are getting all hippy and faggy on issues like this. Nature doesn't imprison flawed, dangerous living creatures that break the natural rule of things they get destroyed by their peers. These three boys are weak, sick and demented individuals. They broke the order of things and spread so much disguisting fear and violence the only answer is to wipe the slate clean with them and hope they come back as something less capable.
In nature, creatures that prey on other creatures that can't defend themselves actually are _not_ destroyed by their peers. You can't make a Darwinistic argument here.
FWIW, I'm not disagreeing with your conclusion. (Although I believe capital punishment -- the death penalty administered by the state -- is wrong. If that makes me "faggy", whatever that is, so be it...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
