|
On December 12 2008 03:02 HamerD wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2008 23:08 LonelyMargarita wrote:
You can't outlaw something that might influence a small percentage of people to do something illegal. It's a slippery slope. I'm quite considerably against slippery slope arguments. I think you can make abstract any subjective concept to make it look unwise with them. Note that I am not against your opinion, because I am halfway between pro and against this idea; but I think the point is that setting paradigms and deciding the point at which something is too far is important. It's an all or nothing mentality which I am against. I would speculate that, because people are not brought up to consider children as sexual partners, most paedophiles will have to go through a sort of 'discovery' of their unusual sexual urges. This will, I assume, feature going through different levels of pornography and then onto real life. It's one for the research, and I don't have time to look through the academic papers. Suffice to say I don't think your point of view there is incontestable. General consensus is to keep marijuana levels to a minimum, because it is a gateway to harder stuff; and the law reflects this. It has been decided that marijuana is one step too far, but nicotine is not...the slippery slope is avoided because people set the line and don't go for an 'all or nothing' mentality...and I think it could be argued that the same should go for child pornography of any kind.
On December 11 2008 05:38 Flaccid wrote:
Sounds like something a SCORPIO would say!!!
|
So since "the word ‘person’ included fictional or imaginary characters" if a 25 year old actress played a 16 year old on a TV show, would nude pictures of that character be considered child porn? I think not but who knows how Australia would see it.
Ridiculous
|
On December 11 2008 17:35 suidfhiufh wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2008 17:31 Kwark wrote:On December 11 2008 17:27 suidfhiufh wrote:On December 11 2008 16:59 LonelyMargarita wrote:On December 11 2008 16:19 suidfhiufh wrote:On December 11 2008 16:08 CharlieMurphy wrote:
LOL, isnt all porn illegal in AUS though.
I can't believe that he can't defend this, its obviously not real porn. Its more of a gag to send people and laugh at. How did he get caught anyways? simpsons porn = bart and lisa = kids = kiddy porn = lucky he didnt go to jail Troll much? Every definition of "child" has either "person" or "human" in it. A drawing cannot be a child. HI RETARD THE JUDGE JUST SAID IT IS, MANY COUNTRIES SAY IT IS, WHY DO U THINK IM TROLLING OH MAYBE UR JUST A FUCKING IDIOT I still don't fully know if you're trolling or not... Maybe if you mixed in some italics and a bit of bold then I'd get the inflections you're putting on the words. the judge just said a drawing of a person counts as a person therefore the guy can be prosecuted i clarified to charliemurphy how the logic works then this retard above me says im trolling and making things up when im literally and SO SO FUCKING SIMPLY re-iterating what is in the OP so i shout at him
OMG, I tore apart an old Simpson's comic book I had full of drawings of persons which count as persons. By the judge's logic, I must have committed murder!!!
o_O
|
In every western country graphic child porn is as illegal as real child porn. And every year in each country there are many people that get convicted on basis of that law.
Really, I don't see why people are surprised.
|
On December 11 2008 15:16 BlackJack wrote:
LOL wow
the simpsons was created 18 years ago, wouldnt that make everyone legal age? LOL
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
|
SEND ME T JAIL OMG
NSFW
+ Show Spoiler +
and lol in the simpson's movie it shows bart's penis. I am a pedophile for watching it.
|
On December 12 2008 09:37 CharlieMurphy wrote:SEND ME T JAIL OMG NSFW + Show Spoiler +and lol in the simpson's movie it shows bart's penis. I am a pedophile for watching it.
oh god... oh god... oh god...
this is becoming like that one filth site full of little kids venting their anger about being abused at school and not being able to play football, so they end up staying at home all day on the internet looking at wierd porn and playing games, such as starcraft
|
wait that kinda turned me on
|
On December 12 2008 13:05 warribbons wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2008 09:37 CharlieMurphy wrote:SEND ME T JAIL OMG NSFW + Show Spoiler +and lol in the simpson's movie it shows bart's penis. I am a pedophile for watching it. oh god... oh god... oh god... this is becoming like that one filth site full of little kids venting their anger about being abused at school and not being able to play football, so they end up staying at home all day on the internet looking at wierd porn and playing games, such as starcraft What does that have to do with anything... Blatant troll??
|
this is ridiculous. I think somewhere at my parents house I still have a floppy disk with Simpson's porn on it. I remember it being pretty funny when I was 13. I guess I could get put away. lol
|
Haha good thing this wasn't ruled in japan ruin a much of perverts evenings
|
On December 11 2008 15:15 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
hahaha thats is hilarious. I bet those lawyers would have a field day if they found out what the hell a 4chan was.
haha pwnt
|
This shit is on 4chan on a daily basis...lol.
|
|
|
On December 12 2008 15:30 FREEloss_ca wrote:
This shit is on 4chan on a daily basis...lol.
Yeah but there it's because children are posting it. If they aren't children and they are posting on 4chan sigh... sad sad poeple
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://img02.picoodle.com/img/img02/8/4/13/f_simpsonsporm_de1da5c.jpg)
