atrology has existed well before modern religion and before any complexes that you know today so how can you call it bullshit without researching it. You'd rather believe some words that have been spinned by Kings and other men of power, atrology is something that it constant its their you can see it , you can't see anything real that is based on religion so far can you?
Or better yet do you not believe in anything ? Well that means you don't believe in your own existence i mean how can you exist without being created for some event to have happened, based on religion, atrology or otherwise?
I just recently infact a few weeks ago found out about the mayan calendar and so what if i was born on 21st and im only 15 does that kill my credability am i a lunatic now? Will i be featured on CNN tommorow? Oh Noez
I'm done with this thread. A word of advice though: PRIVATE corporations are going to find you, implant a chip in you, and track your movements and everything you do because you are making some dangerous claims. So I'd sleep with two eyes open if I were you. Have a nice day.
On September 28 2007 07:32 TechniQ.UK wrote: atrology has existed well before modern religion and before any complexes that you know today so how can you call it bullshit without researching it. You'd rather believe some words that have been spinned by Kings and other men of power, atrology is something that it constant its their you can see it , you can't see anything real that is based on religion so far can you?
oh god. Because belief in something is old, its more likely to be true? I suppose you firmly believe the earth is flat? here be dragons? that sort of thing?
You can see stars. You can see planets. You can't see astrology, because astrology is a concept, astrology was created by a bunch of illiterate peasants who somehow believed that the position of individual planets and stars somehow determined their lives.
People like that were ignorant and didn't know any better. They also had the excuse of being surrounded by other people who believed in the same things. You, on the other hand.....
Or better yet do you not believe in anything ? Well that means you don't believe in your own existence i mean how can you exist without being created for some event to have happened, based on religion, atrology or otherwise?
Yes. Obviously If I dont believe in your asinine conspiracy theories then I don't believe in anything! If someone doesnt believe in UFOs, that person doesn't exist!!!!. that means they must be aliens!
I just recently infact a few weeks ago found out about the mayan calendar and so what if i was born on 21st and im only 15 does that kill my credability am i a lunatic now? Will i be featured on CNN tommorow? Oh Noez
The only problem with these long videos about random esoteric topics are that when we are on the computer we don't expect to watch a 1-2 hour documentary. If we wanted to do that we would flip on history/discovery channel or DL the stuff.
Some people may watch it and start a discussion but the majority of people don't. If you are one of those people just don't respond.
The first 6 minutes, hes talking about how The Royal Family planned on destroying America during its conception.... God hes even talking about more stupid shit...
I'm going to tough this movie out. So far its pretty ridiculous. I'm only 9 minutes into it.
Lmfao he's judging Bushs family line because it can apparently be traced back to the 15th Century. Hes apparently related to Monarchs and what not, who we're ruthless killers. "It's business as usual for these people"
Ugh... hes calling everyone "Agents" of some higher power. Which is pretty much The Royal Family...
Oh my god this video... I feel like my IQ is degrading every minute I keep watching this.
Yeah I can't do this anymore... I give up. I made it past 12 minutes.
On September 28 2007 08:09 TechniQ.UK wrote: astrology is still based on something real something with actual content you twat.
Astrology is based on the assumption that the stars play a role in our everyday lives.
Is there any proof of this based on the scientific method?
No, Astrologers have absolutely no evidence to back up their claims.
Are astrologers consistent in their predictions?
1 in 100000 at best.
Astrologers are future-tellers, telling the future is a physical impossibility.
Is astrology a science?
no, because it doesn't follow the scientific method. Astrology is a pseudo-science. LOOK IT UP IN THE DICTIONARY
Can astrology be tested?
no because there is no possible way of knowing a star can influence a certain person born on a certain time of the calendar.
Conclusion? Astrology is complete utter baloney, it is not a science. it never was.
Astrology is based on real things. Planets are real, however planets do NOT play any role on a certain person just because he was born a Libra or a Aquarius.
Same goes for UFO sightings.
Just REASON a bit.
The premise. Super advanced aliens who are able to travel at the speed of light were stupid enough to crash on earth soil. RIGHT!
People claim to see UFOs everywhere, yet there is no solid evidence of a spacecraft hovering the skies.
People claim to have been abducted. There is absolutely no evidence that proves this. There are no body marks, no probes up their anus. NOTHING. It's all claims and claims and more claims.
I'm sure theres other species out there in our vast universe. Ridiculous conspiracy theories will get you nowhere. It's fun to pretend to be a scientist, science is cool! These people pretend to be scientist, pretend to use science to make some quick money off uneducated people.
I assume you are under 18, just be careful with what you believe in. Being open minded is admitting that you may be wrong sometimes.