EPTOn April 27 2012 14:10 sheaRZerg wrote:
If that were the sole purpose of the bill they could write it to specifically limit the use of the data for those purposes. I find it worrisome how vague and broad their definitions are, like it were specifically designed to have loopholes for corporations corporations and the federal government to use it for other purposes. I guess if you are planning to go to the effort to put a bill through congress nowadays you better be able to use it as broadly as possible :/
If that were the sole purpose of the bill they could write it to specifically limit the use of the data for those purposes. I find it worrisome how vague and broad their definitions are, like it were specifically designed to have loopholes for corporations corporations and the federal government to use it for other purposes. I guess if you are planning to go to the effort to put a bill through congress nowadays you better be able to use it as broadly as possible :/
It's broad because they don't know wtf they are doing. They don't want to risk writing legislation that will become inadequate in 2 years, but don't know what "cybersecurity" even entails in the first place.
the more they know about you, the easier is the way to control you. I would love to see a government sharing their private date to the public, after all, what do they have to hide? 
