EPTyes but both scenarios would infer the back being more wet than the front?
Shooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 195
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
Masq
Canada1792 Posts
yes but both scenarios would infer the back being more wet than the front? | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:21 Masq wrote: yes but both scenarios would infer the back being more wet than the front? i think laying in the grass would result in a wetter back than being on top of trayvon. | ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:21 Masq wrote: yes but both scenarios would infer the back being more wet than the front? Kaitlin explained it better on the previous page in case you missed it: On June 29 2013 04:19 Kaitlin wrote: Laying in wet grass has the effect of your clothes being pushed into the wet grass, thus acting like a sponge in picking up moisture. edit: Not to mention, Zimmerman's coat looks somewhat water resistant, therefore mitigating the effect of falling rain, but not sponge forced into being absorbed by his body weight. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10655 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:36 dAPhREAk wrote: i just noticed the defense has a black, female attorney/paralegal/eye candy on their side. well played, well played indeed. Lol I assume you approve of moves like this. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
OBJECTION! lol | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:36 dAPhREAk wrote: i just noticed the defense has a black, female attorney/paralegal/eye candy on their side. well played, well played indeed. I saw her yesterday. Noticed her as quite attractive, in addition. No blacks in prosecution, wonder if that will be an issue after the case. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:39 dAPhREAk wrote: "like he didnt know why he screamed for help, but nobody would help him?" "correct" OBJECTION! lol I wonder if that kind of objection does anything but bring more attention to that point. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:39 dAPhREAk wrote: "like he didnt know why he screamed for help, but nobody would help him?" "correct" OBJECTION! lol State your legal reason for objecting, counsel. It's hurts my case, really really bad, your Honor. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:37 Emnjay808 wrote: Lol I assume you approve of moves like this. i will neither affirm nor deny that i ask my corporate clients to bring a black representative for the company when being sued for racial discrimination by a black individual. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:39 Kaitlin wrote: I saw her yesterday. Noticed her as quite attractive, in addition. No blacks in prosecution, wonder if that will be an issue after the case. nope. they have the family sitting behind them. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:40 Kaitlin wrote: State your legal reason for objecting, counsel. It's hurts my case, really really bad, your Honor. Well, the objection is valid, he had a reason for it. It just looks really silly. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:40 SKC wrote: I wonder if that kind of objection does anything but bring more attention to that point. it was sustained, but try unringing that bell. lol. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:41 dAPhREAk wrote: it was sustained, but try unringing that bell. lol. Well, yeah, but everyone heard the answer anyway. It's not an "official" response and so I guess they just can't bring up that point in the future, but it did it's job. I don't think he minded it being sustained all that much. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:43 SKC wrote: Well, yeah, but everyone heard the answer anyway. It's not an "official" response and so I guess they just can't bring up that point in the future, but it did it's job. I don't think he minded it being sustained all that much. yep. "unring the bell" is when inadmissible evidence gets in front of the jury and you try to do damage control. its very hard to "unring the bell." =) | ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:36 dAPhREAk wrote: i just noticed the defense has a black, female attorney/paralegal/eye candy on their side. well played, well played indeed. It's Rachel Zane, bro. | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 29 2013 04:48 NEOtheONE wrote: So much speculation related questioning. That's going to get sustained 9/10 times. Well, he is also making his point. The jury knows that the police officer doesn't know GZ's state of mind during the shooting. | ||
| ||
