EPTIf Box A is smaller than Box B (in mass) but larger than Box C and Box C is a hollow Box inside Box B, is it possible to fit Box A through Box C to reach the other side of Box B?
Shape unspecified.
Ask and answer stupid questions here! - Page 18
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
If Box A is smaller than Box B (in mass) but larger than Box C and Box C is a hollow Box inside Box B, is it possible to fit Box A through Box C to reach the other side of Box B? Shape unspecified. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11312 Posts
What you are giving are only the relations of the volume(Or mass, but mass is kind of irrelevant here since you got no density defined and are talking about the shapes of objects, so i assume you meant volume) of the boxes. V(B)>V(A)>V(C) Of course, you still got lots of definition problems in your wording, but i am going to assume that what you mean is that you got 3 solid objects, and in object C there is an opening of some sort. Now, you can make the hole inside C as large as you wish by just stretching the sides thinner. Which means that the restriction on the size of that hole in C is that it is smaller than object B, since C is inside B. So you can produce an object C which is 1) smaller in volume than A, 2) inside box B, and 3) has a hole in it that allows A to fit through. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17831 Posts
On December 20 2013 01:32 3FFA wrote: Given a Box A, a Box B, and a Box C: If Box A is smaller than Box B (in mass) but larger than Box C and Box C is a hollow Box inside Box B, is it possible to fit Box A through Box C to reach the other side of Box B? Shape unspecified. Seeing as you can use different materials, making A's mass bigger than C's says nothing much. However, even if you work just in volumes, it depends on the specific properties of the materials being used and the shape of the objects (they're clearly not boxes). In other words, your problem is underspecified. The way you asked it, the answer is clearly yes: you can pick any number of conditions to make this possible. | ||
|
HeatEXTEND
Netherlands836 Posts
| ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
This post has been brought to you by Zerglogg's™ Marine Mix Cereal - it's aaaaaaaaghh-mazing!™ | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
| ||
|
vndestiny
Singapore3438 Posts
On December 22 2013 23:21 ninazerg wrote: Hey, what would happen if we killed all the mosquitoes in the world? There would be no more mosquito duh  | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 22 2013 23:21 ninazerg wrote: Hey, what would happen if we killed all the mosquitoes in the world? There would be less frogs since they eat mosquitoes There would be less French people since they eat frogs Stephano would die  | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11312 Posts
You got lots of different species in some way related to mosquitoes, like frogs, fish, anything mosquitoes sting, diseases transmitted by mosquitoes, and whatever else. And then you got everything somehow related to any of those species. And so on. Ultimately things will balance out in some way. If that new equilibrium would be "better" is pretty much impossible to tell. My guess would be on no. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17831 Posts
On December 23 2013 00:03 Simberto wrote: First, there are no more mosquitoes. Afterwards, there will be less of those animals that eat mosquitoes, more of those that are in some way endangered by mosquitoes or share a habitat with them. Afterwards, stuff becomes pretty much uncontrollable with all the different links interacting and leading to a new equilibrium that is basically impossible to foretell. You got lots of different species in some way related to mosquitoes, like frogs, fish, anything mosquitoes sting, diseases transmitted by mosquitoes, and whatever else. And then you got everything somehow related to any of those species. And so on. Ultimately things will balance out in some way. If that new equilibrium would be "better" is pretty much impossible to tell. My guess would be on no. Well, we'd wipe out Malaria, Dengue, Yellow Fever and a whole host of other tropical diseases. However, we might inadvertently cause new diseases to move in and take their place, because they are transmitted by *insert insect that fills mosquitos' niche*, but were extremely rare in humans. To be fair, wiping out mosquitos in large parts of the world using DDT during the 60s didn't really have much of a negative effect at all (insofar as the loss of mosquitos goes... spraying everything with DDT was arguably pretty bad). | ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
On December 22 2013 23:15 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: 600 if he eats them with milk This post has been brought to you by Zerglogg's™ Marine Mix Cereal - it's aaaaaaaaghh-mazing!™ Is that coming soon™ with some hype-tastic videos and articles spread out over random periods of time to maintain maximum levels of hype? | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 23 2013 10:59 3FFA wrote: Is that coming soon™ with some hype-tastic videos and articles spread out over random periods of time to maintain maximum levels of hype? No silly, it's an existing product that's bombarded at children every 15 minutes between episodes of Spongebob until they scream and cry at their parents to buy it for them. | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17831 Posts
On December 24 2013 02:20 ninazerg wrote: Who is the best rapper alive? 2pac! | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
ALIVE. ALIIIIIVE. Tupac is dead, don't tell me he's living in the Dominican Republic or something stupid. No. It's not funny anymore. The rapper has to be alive, so don't say Tupac, Biggie, Big L, or Jam Master J. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17831 Posts
On December 24 2013 02:24 ninazerg wrote: ALIVE. ALIIIIIVE. Tupac is dead, don't tell me he's living in the Dominican Republic or something stupid. No. It's not funny anymore. The rapper has to be alive, so don't say Tupac, Biggie, Big L, or Jam Master J. Okay.... ELVIS! | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 24 2013 02:20 ninazerg wrote: Who is the best rapper alive? Wrappers are made of brightly colored plastic, none of them are alive. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
On December 24 2013 02:20 ninazerg wrote: Who is the best rapper alive? im leaning towards you recently | ||
|
Jormundr
United States1678 Posts
On December 24 2013 02:24 ninazerg wrote: ALIVE. ALIIIIIVE. Tupac is dead, don't tell me he's living in the Dominican Republic or something stupid. No. It's not funny anymore. The rapper has to be alive, so don't say Tupac, Biggie, Big L, or Jam Master J. | ||
| ||
