Van Gogh self-portrait actually not Van Gogh - Page 3
Forum Index > General Forum |
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
| ||
LoLAdriankat
United States4307 Posts
I don't know much about Van Gogh, but I always recognized that portrait as a portrait of Van Gogh. This is a pretty huge step in art history. | ||
han_han
United States205 Posts
The more I look at it now, the more I see our loveable protoss pro-gamer. I'm fairly certain that Van Gogh was not painting either himself or his brother. He was painting WhiteRa. | ||
Crazyeyes
Canada1342 Posts
On June 22 2011 20:24 RA wrote: Really? This made me laugh most of all. "Really? Are we really going down that path?" This thread is now about White-Ra. XD The fact that he painted 'in reverse' seems really... insignificant. | ||
![]()
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
| ||
VictorJones
United States235 Posts
| ||
aseq
Netherlands3969 Posts
| ||
Kaonis
United States243 Posts
Looks like the appraisers played it by ear... + Show Spoiler + *puts on sunglasses* + Show Spoiler + ... and they saw that something was off. + Show Spoiler + YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH On topic, it's pretty cool to see the art world being shaken up a little. I remember reeading about how close Van Gogh was to his brother. | ||
Crazyboogie
Denmark19 Posts
| ||
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
On June 23 2011 18:46 Kaonis wrote: + Show Spoiler + Looks like the appraisers played it by ear... + Show Spoiler + *puts on sunglasses* + Show Spoiler + ... and they saw that something was off. + Show Spoiler + YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH On topic, it's pretty cool to see the art world being shaken up a little. I remember reeading about how close Van Gogh was to his brother. well fucking played i dont mind the whole art word being shaken up thing, it can be revenge for the week i had to learn about impressionism in art history >< | ||
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
I think not! | ||
| ||