| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On February 02 2010 15:05 Xxio wrote: Next it will be the google OS killing MS7 :D then google will taken over the world (except China lol) Google OS is the worst OS ever created. | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On February 04 2010 10:16 ghermination wrote: Comrade Dover will be getting banned pretty damned soon. For? On February 04 2010 10:16 ghermination wrote: Also Chrome is just a joke. Bad interface and market saturation. Oh, for liking Chrome. Got it. -.-" | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11554 Posts
But yeah ComradeDover, you're either going to get banned for liking Chrome, or for attacking the other person's choice of OS and ridiculing them :D | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
Mainly the thing is that chrome does alot of things that other browsers already do and do them just fine if not better, I mean out of the box nothing beats operas features and ui customization, IE8 security on windows 7 is fucking amazing how far they gone to make it secure (as long as you're not an idiot and surf the web on a true admin account or disable uac and keep protected mode on you're nearily golden to alot of types of attacks) or FF add on data base, all chrome is doing is taking attenion away and making an already filled market more cramped. Mostly i dislike it becuase google keeps tring to make me download it when i go to anything by google. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On February 04 2010 06:52 ComradeDover wrote: Fair enough, but like you said, I don't know how long they're going to hold that advantage. Developer bases take time to build. Look how long it took Firefox to get where they are now? There's at least enough time for Firefox to do something good with Firefox 4. On February 04 2010 06:52 ComradeDover wrote: This is such a small point I would say it borders on being irrelevent. This is something I'd gladly trade away in exchange for the speed and stability that Chrome offers. Speed I'll concede, but I'm still not convinced that Chrome is more stable than Opera. Stress-testing them is hard to do convincingly though. On February 04 2010 16:43 Virtue wrote: Chrome is by google that's what not to like :D ... Mostly i dislike it becuase google keeps tring to make me download it when i go to anything by google. Again, these are not real arguments you can hold against Chrome when Chromium and Iron exist as equivalents. | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11554 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17544 Posts
On February 04 2010 17:01 FragKrag wrote: Oh, I never realized Chromium was a standalone browser :o I'll take it out for a test run :D It is. It's baiscally Chrome but without Google branding and auto-updater. Edit: Also, to the person that mentioned Chrome for Linux being in beta... This doesn't mean that some core features shouldn't be working. Firefox alpha builds haven't any problem with that. | ||
|
BumbleB
Canada49 Posts
| ||
|
sassy
240 Posts
it served me for a long time and im not going to turn my back on it just because something that is barely faster came out im going to stick with firefox because fuck google ![[image loading]](http://www.fedoraforum.org/gallery/file_4gallery/5/7/5/9/1765ffox-wp-1024a.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1433/1140859578_f772cb1455.jpg?v=0) ![[image loading]](http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/tech_games/firefox2.jpg) | ||
|
Terranist
United States2496 Posts
On February 04 2010 16:27 FragKrag wrote: What isn't there to like about Chrome? Just a few compatibility issues, but even those aren't as common anymore. But yeah ComradeDover, you're either going to get banned for liking Chrome, or for attacking the other person's choice of OS and ridiculing them :D chrome is an excellent browser and may even run a bit faster on my system but i get really paranoid surfing without the firefox noscript plugin. | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
On February 04 2010 16:43 Virtue wrote: Chrome is by google that's what not to like :D Mainly the thing is that chrome does alot of things that other browsers already do and do them just fine if not better, I mean out of the box nothing beats operas features and ui customization, IE8 security on windows 7 is fucking amazing how far they gone to make it secure (as long as you're not an idiot and surf the web on a true admin account or disable uac and keep protected mode on you're nearily golden to alot of types of attacks) or FF add on data base, all chrome is doing is taking attenion away and making an already filled market more cramped. Mostly i dislike it becuase google keeps tring to make me download it when i go to anything by google. other browsers do not manage tabs like chrome does, and one of the best features is dragging out a tab to create a new window or placing it in an existent window without reloading the page. that's enough to make chrome my main browser. if i want to use firefox addons i'd use firefox for those occasions. so no, not all browsers can do the things in chrome "just fine" and certainly they can't do it better. plus i like webkit a lot more than gecko | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On February 04 2010 16:48 TheYango wrote: Developer bases take time to build. Look how long it took Firefox to get where they are now? There's at least enough time for Firefox to do something good with Firefox 4. Speed I'll concede, but I'm still not convinced that Chrome is more stable than Opera. Stress-testing them is hard to do convincingly though. Again, these are not real arguments you can hold against Chrome when Chromium and Iron exist as equivalents. Nope it's still an arguement aganist chromeium and iron easily because i want chrome to die i wont support any of it's off shoots just because google is shoving it down my thoat every time i use something by google Also my quote the first line is scarcasm hard to get scarcasm accross the internet. if people allowed to shoot down IE just because it's by microsoft i can shoot down chrome and everything like it just because google is fucking annoying. They argument goes you lessen the preceived value of the brower to the clients by using adverts to get the message accross that CHROME IS BY GOOGLE. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On February 04 2010 21:40 Terranist wrote: chrome is an excellent browser and may even run a bit faster on my system but i get really paranoid surfing without the firefox noscript plugin. You do know you could just disable your javascript or set up a trusted core list of website notiables that get lax security and beef it up everywhere else it's how i run my IE and i know you can do it in opera i'm sure you can do it in FF too Frankly i find it funny that people love no script and yet claim they use FF for it's javascript speed basiclly they calim ff is so fast becuase it doesn't render javascript when i don't want it to it's how i can tell the diff t-t Personally i don't know why people who just check maybe 10 20 sites don't take the time to set up trusted websites then just disable everything else to beef up security, my opera and ie only has maybe 30 trusted websites else by defult javascript and everything else is pretty much disabled. Take maybe 10 mins of you're life really like 5 and then you no longer need those shittty point less plug ins like no script which is just a shortcut to disable and creative zones to what you can already do with FF. | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17544 Posts
On February 05 2010 08:17 CharlieMurphy wrote: does anyone use flock? My roomie has been using that for a long time and it always looked shitty to me, he swears by it. Are there browser comparison charts anywhere? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html | ||
|
Captain Mayhem
Sweden774 Posts
As far as I experienced, FF handled everything marginally better than Chrome, except for flash players and games. Also, Chrome was quite glitchy, it kept "skipping" sometimes when I had too much shit going on, tabbing out to my messenger or something else running behind it. It will probably be fixed in the future if it hasn't already, but aside from that, the difference was so miniscule that I don't see a reason to switch from either to the other at all. But I would really prefer using IE, if it didn't fuck up my bookmarks whenever I try to import them  | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
| ||
Mystlord
United States10264 Posts
Honestly, I keep a copy of every single browser on my computer, just in case  | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Big Brain Bouts
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
|
|
|
EPT
