|
On April 22 2010 09:46 iLoveKT wrote:
whats with the long and thoughtful posts guys?
obviously they were on crack
|
On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler +
The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~
So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Spent way tooo long edited meh pub game clips lol.
|
On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler +
naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze
On April 22 2010 09:49 Elegance wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 09:46 iLoveKT wrote:
whats with the long and thoughtful posts guys? obviously they were on crack
is it true bc bud = $80 for an eighth in the u.s.?
|
United States3824 Posts
On April 22 2010 10:29 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler + naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 09:49 Elegance wrote:On April 22 2010 09:46 iLoveKT wrote:
whats with the long and thoughtful posts guys? obviously they were on crack is it true bc bud = $80 for an eighth in the u.s.?
80 Canadian Dollars but we have like a 2:1 CD:USD ratio when buying product 
|
On April 22 2010 10:29 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler + naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze [
G G G G G, I told you. I've already figured out the wavelength of your trolololol shields. You can't deflect my skull seeking penis bomb.
|
skull seeking penis bomb... i see...
|
On April 22 2010 11:39 L wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 10:29 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler + naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze [ G G G G G, I told you. I've already figured out the wavelength of your trolololol shields. You can't deflect my skull seeking penis bomb.
you got one extra g in there babe ze
|
L is good at penis seeking things isn't he.
|
On April 22 2010 10:38 cgrinker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 10:29 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler + naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze On April 22 2010 09:49 Elegance wrote:On April 22 2010 09:46 iLoveKT wrote:
whats with the long and thoughtful posts guys? obviously they were on crack is it true bc bud = $80 for an eighth in the u.s.? 80 Canadian Dollars but we have like a 2:1 CD:USD ratio when buying product
ahaha i pay $220usd an oz here (hawaii)
but if i want my choice of strains its anywhere up to 3 bills
if there was a tournament where players had to play stoned i would smash that shit
|
On April 22 2010 12:44 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 11:39 L wrote:On April 22 2010 10:29 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 10:15 L wrote:On April 22 2010 09:34 JeeJee wrote:On April 22 2010 08:46 L wrote:On April 22 2010 08:25 JeeJee wrote:
it's funny because you nor your arguments make any sense actually ze.
vs magically seeing uphills has nothing to do with the example i brought up. the fact that you focus on that completely irrelevant aspect shows you have no idea how to respond to the actual point i'm making, but to humour you i have explained several times how vs can swap someone sitting uphill. but again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
and again, the issue with the macropyre example isn't that the thd can defend a 5man push, it's the fact that you said a team can push into the enemy's base with no creep support and call it not bd. again i congratulate you on completely missing the point ze.
i admire that you finally figured out you make no sense though ze. Your trolololol was good before I figured it out. Now its just sad. just cause i'm adding ze doesn't mean i'm not serious. but i'm happy that this debate has ended so this thread can go back to being on topic + Show Spoiler + The debate ended because your posts were terrible ze~ So good job getting us back to ze~, ze~. + Show Spoiler + naw, just that you finally realized none of your counterarguments make any sense ze [ G G G G G, I told you. I've already figured out the wavelength of your trolololol shields. You can't deflect my skull seeking penis bomb. you got one extra g in there babe ze
Its for good luck.
But seriously, no one here played turok?
|
lol i remember turok for n64
|
|
|
yeah i was like 11 when i first got an n64. i couldn't play m rated games yo.
|
Who needs turok golden eye is what it was all about anyways.
|
|
|
pokemon snap was fucking awful
one of my favorite games on n64 was body harvest though... fuck yeah, killing aliens.
|
pokemon snap was ownage
but i rented (or borrowed?) it and only played it for a little bit
|
goldeneye
jet force jemini
mario 64
ssb
all yoou fuckin need
|
On April 22 2010 14:54 paper wrote:
pokemon snap was ownage
but i rented (or borrowed?) it and only played it for a little bit
lol i never actually owned starfox 64, i just rented it at least 20+ times. amazing game. too bad if you go back now and play it you realize that most of it is retardedly easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
