I'm kind of curious, is this a multi-part article about savior, or is this "God of X" thing more like a series about different players who achieve/overcome the extraordinary?

Because that would be cool too!

Divine-Sneaker

Denmark1225 Posts

May 24 2011 23:38 GMT

#282

Holy motherfucker. So much material and excellent material at that.
Final edits, fuck yeah.

KyoRai

United States134 Posts

May 24 2011 23:39 GMT

#283

Ver you have amazing write ups. You really outdid your iloveoov one in epicness :D

for those of you that haven't read it:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=81288

Also, I would love to have the pics in higher resolution

EchelonTee

United States5262 Posts

May 24 2011 23:39 GMT

#284

great read... nice to read some of the history of BW. it's easy to pick apart why boxer/oov and others were legendary, but savior's subtleties are amazing as well.

Adron

Netherlands839 Posts

May 24 2011 23:41 GMT

#285

A great in-depth tactical article, loved every moment reading it.

Crunchums

United States11144 Posts

May 24 2011 23:41 GMT

#286

wow this is long
and it's only part 1?
ver [image loading]

Taekwon

United States8155 Posts

May 24 2011 23:42 GMT

#287

I love you all.

slyboogie

United States3423 Posts

May 24 2011 23:44 GMT

#288

I don't want to steer the conversation too much into SC2 and the balance "discourse" there. But Saviour is exactly why people should be wary about that conversation. The man was dominant, and while other Zergs couldn't just easily emulate his understanding d his play, they could tease out information to improve their own game.

The match up was seriously changed by a player, not really Blizzard.

Loophole

United States867 Posts

May 24 2011 23:44 GMT

#289

Great article! Very interesting stuff on his tactics.

Carnagath

230 Posts

May 24 2011 23:45 GMT

#290

On May 25 2011 08:01 Reborn8u wrote:
Wow, the whole dynamic between lings vs Infantry vs lurkers vs tanks vs defilers vs science vessels vs scourge is amazing. The battlefield situations these units and their abilities create are endless. I really feel sad about playing sc2 now and the good ol' "a move"

SC2 has been out for 10 months. 10 months after the original SC was released, people were massing scouts. It is two expansions and 7 years of gameplay evolution too early to be able to compare to BW, we can at the very least give it some time.

OpticalShot

Canada6330 Posts

May 24 2011 23:45 GMT

#291

Amazing article. Can't undo the wrong things he did, but he certainly revolutionized ZvT.

zyzq

United States3123 Posts

May 24 2011 23:50 GMT

#292

MA BONJWAA <3

anatem

Romania1369 Posts

May 24 2011 23:51 GMT

#293

i think terms like "amazing" are being thrown around too lightly for many articles on TL, but i must say this is absolutely spectacular, from content to form and back again, exceptional read if you love(d) bw

thank you

amazingoopah

United States1925 Posts

May 24 2011 23:52 GMT

#294

On May 25 2011 07:45 Crissaegrim wrote:
I'll admit I did not read it but this has been the most aesthetically pleasing article in a long time. Scrolling through all the headings makes me wonder if SC2 will Reach the same depth =/.

Dont forget that you cant have a legacy article about (Z)