On April 12 2012 07:02 starojda wrote:
Speaking about canadians being all the same... That reminded me of south park
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/prR0K.jpg)
Speaking about canadians being all the same... That reminded me of south park

![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/prR0K.jpg)
epic :D
Forum Index > Fan Clubs |
No transgender / gender identity / gender equality talk in this fanclub please. | ||
Deeno
Finland60 Posts
April 11 2012 22:15 GMT
#2041
On April 12 2012 07:02 starojda wrote: Speaking about canadians being all the same... That reminded me of south park ![]() ![]() epic :D | ||
quaak
6 Posts
April 11 2012 22:36 GMT
#2042
| ||
Mystgun
Hong Kong311 Posts
April 11 2012 22:37 GMT
#2043
| ||
sinistrorsey2
42 Posts
April 11 2012 22:40 GMT
#2044
![]() User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Ambre
France416 Posts
April 11 2012 22:48 GMT
#2045
But SIGN ME IN plz thx. | ||
lolspoon
450 Posts
April 11 2012 22:50 GMT
#2046
On April 12 2012 07:40 sinistrorsey2 wrote: He/she is a really great player, he/she pulled a trimaster ![]() SHE. SHE. SHE How many times should we repeat this? Edit your post b4 u get warned/banned... | ||
AlgeriaT
Sweden2195 Posts
April 11 2012 23:00 GMT
#2047
On April 12 2012 07:50 lolspoon wrote: Show nested quote + On April 12 2012 07:40 sinistrorsey2 wrote: He/she is a really great player, he/she pulled a trimaster ![]() SHE. SHE. SHE How many times should we repeat this? Edit your post b4 u get warned/banned... Quoting these shitposts isn't necessary I think, that just spreads their stupidity out further. Better to just report and let the mods nuke them. User was warned for this post | ||
Grumbels
Netherlands7028 Posts
April 11 2012 23:07 GMT
#2048
| ||
fugs
United States135 Posts
April 11 2012 23:09 GMT
#2049
| ||
See.Blue
United States2673 Posts
April 11 2012 23:15 GMT
#2050
| ||
McPhiz
Canada183 Posts
April 11 2012 23:20 GMT
#2051
| ||
IAMFAPMAN
60 Posts
April 11 2012 23:37 GMT
#2052
| ||
xJonesy
United Kingdom40 Posts
April 11 2012 23:40 GMT
#2053
| ||
IAMFAPMAN
60 Posts
April 11 2012 23:44 GMT
#2054
On April 11 2012 21:50 PlagueWasp wrote: Show nested quote + On April 11 2012 21:31 JOJOsc2news wrote: On April 11 2012 21:23 Zaqwe wrote: On April 11 2012 21:20 turdburgler wrote: On April 11 2012 21:03 Zaqwe wrote: Scarlett is, in fact, genetically and physically a man. The OP said this before but maybe it is edited out. If Scarlett tried to compete in the women's olympics it would not be allowed. there have been women who have been banned from the womens olympics for not being women so i dont see your point. I am not sure I understand your post but my point was that claiming Scarletts achievements on behalf of women is problematic because Scarlett still has any physical or mental advantages that male DNA gives. This is why people who have male DNA and male physiology are not allowed to compete in womens olympics. If men have a natural advantage in Starcraft--not that they necesarily do, but it can't be ruled out based on results--Scarlett has the same natural advantage. I am usually a very mannered person but... For fuck sake! This is a fan club thread! This isn't your personal blog! Write a personal blog about your feelings and all the wrongs in the world that are a burden on your soul! Write about how you are afraid of MM's ever since you choked on one in kindergarten... Do whatever you want but don't do it here! One more time: This is a fanclub thread! Agree that this is a fanclub thread, but don't expect this to stop coming up in posts. It will continue to come up because apparently it is more important to some people what gender a player is instead of whether they can play or not. And they also can't seem to accept the fact that her results at IPL 4 as a previously unknown player are why she suddenly has a lot of fans. feast? | ||
chocopan
Japan986 Posts
April 11 2012 23:59 GMT
#2055
I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler + They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers. Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously. He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .) But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts. They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story. Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above. | ||
TicketoHELL
Canada368 Posts
April 12 2012 01:05 GMT
#2056
| ||
ABagOfFritos
Canada454 Posts
April 12 2012 01:07 GMT
#2057
On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote: Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler + They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers. Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously. He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .) But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts. They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story. Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above. Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens! | ||
Psyborg
Germany5 Posts
April 12 2012 01:10 GMT
#2058
User was warned for this post User was temp banned for this post. | ||
KebertXela
United States322 Posts
April 12 2012 01:20 GMT
#2059
On April 12 2012 10:07 ABagOfFritos wrote: Show nested quote + On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote: Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler + They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers. Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously. He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .) But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts. They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story. Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above. Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens! Also she was a top 10 GM. You can't have a couple of lucky wins to get there. We all know that well ![]() | ||
ABagOfFritos
Canada454 Posts
April 12 2012 01:22 GMT
#2060
On April 12 2012 10:20 KebertXela wrote: Show nested quote + On April 12 2012 10:07 ABagOfFritos wrote: On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote: Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler + They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers. Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously. He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .) But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts. They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story. Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above. Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens! Also she was a top 10 GM. You can't have a couple of lucky wins to get there. We all know that well ![]() Yes and no on this one. Both CombatEX and Deezer have also been up in the top GM spots. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • practicex StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Online Event
MaxPax vs herO
SHIN vs Cure
Clem vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs herO
ShoWTimE vs Clem
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
AllThingsProtoss
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
BSL Season 20
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Afreeca Starleague
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
PiGosaur Monday
GSL Code S
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
RSL Revival
GSL Code S
Korean StarCraft League
RSL Revival
|
|