|
Personal attacks in this thread will draw a temp ban. |
On August 13 2011 04:38 MrDudeMan wrote: I think idra just needs to throw in a couple of more infestors in his composition (game 1 against dde). He would have won it much earlier if he had more fungal.
It's hard to afford more infestors when they are so gas heavy, he always had low resources so it was difficult to afford it.
|
On August 13 2011 04:35 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:33 Mjolnir wrote:
Anyone know where we could see the replays or VODs of the Idra vs DDE in the NA Bnet Inv. that everyone is gushing over right now?
Sounds like it was a good game.
Here DudeEnjoy
Thanks guys. I will sit on this page waiting until they're up data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Sounds pretty epic.
|
On August 13 2011 04:40 HaVoX wrote: It's hard to afford more infestors when they are so gas heavy, he always had low resources so it was difficult to afford it.
I think he had too many corrupters, they are good against vikings but fungal is more important.
|
He needed broodlords and corrupters against vikings and tanks and marines.
What would 2 extra fungals have done ?
|
I thought his decisions were very well thought out in both games, let's not argue pointlessly about silly things.
|
|
|
On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra
Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey?
|
On August 13 2011 04:54 Dariusz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey?
His baneling control in the first few engagements was pretty poor as was flying 8 broodlords away from his army basically directly into dde's army.
still glad he won though.
|
On August 13 2011 04:54 Dariusz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey? his unit control, his decision making, his tendency to take more damage then he should by running units for almost no good reason. he won because his opponent is so much worse than he, not because he played exceptionally well as day9 seems to be constantly bringing up.
|
On August 13 2011 04:58 Malgrif wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:54 Dariusz wrote:On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey? his unit control, his decision making, his tendency to take more damage then he should by running units for almost no good reason. he won because his opponent is so much worse than he, not because he played exceptionally well as day9 seems to be constantly bringing up.
Sloppy though? Unfortunately for idra, most people, because of the nature of the casting, look at greg under a microscope looking for any flaw. It's SO much easier to spot what is done wrong and completely ignore that amazing stuff thats done right. And because the whats done right pretty much gets summed up by one statement by the caster like: But idra's amazing macro is keeping him in the game, people chalk it up to idra is a macro player, but engages poorly, even though only a select few engagements are viewed with ignoring of smaller micro engagements : + Show Spoiler +example being the focus on the main push which was "sloppy" for idra" but then they cut back and idra held a drop up top that we didnt see, or the lings to deny the bottom expansion
|
Is Idra playing Nerchio in 3 h for IPL?
|
On August 13 2011 05:11 Hardigan wrote: Is Idra playing Nerchio in 3 h for IPL?
yup.
Hopefully in IPL season 3 they don't make the mistake of spoiling the games before played (mana vs idra, ret vs nerchio was spoiled by the wall paper they posted of idra vs nerchio friday 8 pm est or something).
|
vods from IdrA vs Naniwa @ Anaheim are up here
|
On August 13 2011 05:23 MonsieurGrimm wrote:vods from IdrA vs Naniwa @ Anaheim are up here Worth watching?
|
On August 13 2011 05:29 Aocowns wrote:Worth watching? no
|
On August 13 2011 05:08 Makura wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:58 Malgrif wrote:On August 13 2011 04:54 Dariusz wrote:On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey? his unit control, his decision making, his tendency to take more damage then he should by running units for almost no good reason. he won because his opponent is so much worse than he, not because he played exceptionally well as day9 seems to be constantly bringing up. Sloppy though? Unfortunately for idra, most people, because of the nature of the casting, look at greg under a microscope looking for any flaw. It's SO much easier to spot what is done wrong and completely ignore that amazing stuff thats done right. And because the whats done right pretty much gets summed up by one statement by the caster like: But idra's amazing macro is keeping him in the game, people chalk it up to idra is a macro player, but engages poorly, even though only a select few engagements are viewed with ignoring of smaller micro engagements : + Show Spoiler +example being the focus on the main push which was "sloppy" for idra" but then they cut back and idra held a drop up top that we didnt see, or the lings to deny the bottom expansion Yeah, people need to stop giving Idra such a hard time. If people say that Idra played terribly but DDE played worse, how does that make everyone who loses to DDE feel? Sure, DDE's macro slipped, but against a lesser Zerg who wasn't being obnoxious in his production line, his macro would probably have been really good.
|
On August 13 2011 05:29 Aocowns wrote:Worth watching?
Nope.
Description of games/results below.
+ Show Spoiler +3 Cheese games in a row resulting in Idra losing
|
|
On August 13 2011 05:08 Makura wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 04:58 Malgrif wrote:On August 13 2011 04:54 Dariusz wrote:On August 13 2011 04:22 taLbuk wrote: Sloppy , but a win is a win, glad to see he didn't leave when he normally would have, mental endurance! gogog idra Why do you jump on this bandwagon? Could you say what exactly was so sloppy in his play or are you just repeating what trolls say like a monkey? his unit control, his decision making, his tendency to take more damage then he should by running units for almost no good reason. he won because his opponent is so much worse than he, not because he played exceptionally well as day9 seems to be constantly bringing up. Sloppy though? Unfortunately for idra, most people, because of the nature of the casting, look at greg under a microscope looking for any flaw. It's SO much easier to spot what is done wrong and completely ignore that amazing stuff thats done right. And because the whats done right pretty much gets summed up by one statement by the caster like: But idra's amazing macro is keeping him in the game, people chalk it up to idra is a macro player, but engages poorly, even though only a select few engagements are viewed with ignoring of smaller micro engagements : + Show Spoiler +example being the focus on the main push which was "sloppy" for idra" but then they cut back and idra held a drop up top that we didnt see, or the lings to deny the bottom expansion
Sir, I agree with you completely.
|
|
|
|