|
Personal attacks in this thread will draw a temp ban. |
On August 17 2012 10:00 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 09:55 Aocowns wrote:On August 17 2012 09:51 Forikorder wrote:"Bonjwa" is a term used to describe a player who dominates the StarCraft: Brood Wars / StarCraft 2 scene for a long period of time. A bonjwa has a very high winning percentage and successive title wins. However, a bonjwa is not defined by his statistics or records. Rather, a general consensus is reached that he is the most dominant progamer of his era. For Brood War era Bonjwas - check here. Currently no SC2 player was considered a Bonjwa, though 2011 Mvp was closest to being one. i dont think anyones won 2 GSLs back to back, and noones ever looks immortal for more then one GSL so i wouldnt call anyone really dominate enough to be considered a bonjwa No that's what everyone said to begin with, Mvp was the one to come closest, then you started saying Nestea was the one to come closest after calling Blade ignorant -.- Blade was implying that MVP should be considered a Bonjwa for his performance in 2011 when its clear noone has shown the level of dominance needed to become a bonjwa, maybe if he won every GSL in 2011 and maybe a foreign tournament or two he could be called bonjwa
No I never said he was a bonjwa but he showed dominance. Dominance for a lot of 2011 doesn't = bonjwa it just means he showed it was possible to dominate as people say isn't possible in sc2 but he showed that you could.
|
On August 17 2012 10:25 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 10:00 Forikorder wrote:On August 17 2012 09:55 Aocowns wrote:On August 17 2012 09:51 Forikorder wrote:"Bonjwa" is a term used to describe a player who dominates the StarCraft: Brood Wars / StarCraft 2 scene for a long period of time. A bonjwa has a very high winning percentage and successive title wins. However, a bonjwa is not defined by his statistics or records. Rather, a general consensus is reached that he is the most dominant progamer of his era. For Brood War era Bonjwas - check here. Currently no SC2 player was considered a Bonjwa, though 2011 Mvp was closest to being one. i dont think anyones won 2 GSLs back to back, and noones ever looks immortal for more then one GSL so i wouldnt call anyone really dominate enough to be considered a bonjwa No that's what everyone said to begin with, Mvp was the one to come closest, then you started saying Nestea was the one to come closest after calling Blade ignorant -.- Blade was implying that MVP should be considered a Bonjwa for his performance in 2011 when its clear noone has shown the level of dominance needed to become a bonjwa, maybe if he won every GSL in 2011 and maybe a foreign tournament or two he could be called bonjwa No I never said he was a bonjwa but he showed dominance. Dominance for a lot of 2011 doesn't = bonjwa it just means he showed it was possible to dominate as people say isn't possible in sc2 but he showed that you could.
But he was a bonjwa. How you like them apples, BLADE?
|
On August 17 2012 11:01 mambar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 10:25 blade55555 wrote:On August 17 2012 10:00 Forikorder wrote:On August 17 2012 09:55 Aocowns wrote:On August 17 2012 09:51 Forikorder wrote:"Bonjwa" is a term used to describe a player who dominates the StarCraft: Brood Wars / StarCraft 2 scene for a long period of time. A bonjwa has a very high winning percentage and successive title wins. However, a bonjwa is not defined by his statistics or records. Rather, a general consensus is reached that he is the most dominant progamer of his era. For Brood War era Bonjwas - check here. Currently no SC2 player was considered a Bonjwa, though 2011 Mvp was closest to being one. i dont think anyones won 2 GSLs back to back, and noones ever looks immortal for more then one GSL so i wouldnt call anyone really dominate enough to be considered a bonjwa No that's what everyone said to begin with, Mvp was the one to come closest, then you started saying Nestea was the one to come closest after calling Blade ignorant -.- Blade was implying that MVP should be considered a Bonjwa for his performance in 2011 when its clear noone has shown the level of dominance needed to become a bonjwa, maybe if he won every GSL in 2011 and maybe a foreign tournament or two he could be called bonjwa No I never said he was a bonjwa but he showed dominance. Dominance for a lot of 2011 doesn't = bonjwa it just means he showed it was possible to dominate as people say isn't possible in sc2 but he showed that you could. But he was a bonjwa. How you like them apples, BLADE?
Are they... Green apples? :D
|
|
|
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games
|
On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games
its common knowledge the games were played 1 hour ago and the account is in the OP, im just a messenger... if it was cloaked stuff that would be different, or if it was smurf accounts or some other thing or if the games werent said to be live..
|
On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games
and what do you mean nonplayed?
|
IdrA breaking the metagame with Baneling speed before Ling speed lol
|
On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed?
meaning like iirc in the past links to spoilers are discouraged even if not direct spoiler. may be wrong tho
|
On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed?
games that havent been played on the tournament stream yet
linking spoilers is frowned upon but the mods wont warn him for linking IdrAs account since hes not actually telling anyone spoilers and its not possible for someone to accidently spoil themselves you have to know what to look for and deliberately look for it
|
On August 17 2012 12:44 CeriseCherries wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed? meaning like iirc in the past links to spoilers are discouraged even if not direct spoiler. may be wrong tho
you said nonplayed, the games were obviously already played if i can link to them. Also
IdrA got a new account with RC at the end
so next season he might ladder with EGIdrARC or he might just use it for tournaments. He already has 2 ladder accounts, EGIdrA and IIIIIIIIII (the only zerg barcode in top 16..)
|
On August 17 2012 12:47 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed? deliberately look for it
this
|
On August 17 2012 12:49 Rulker wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:47 Forikorder wrote:On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed? deliberately look for it this
i jsut want it to be said i still think its a douche move to stalk profiles like that to figure out tournaments beforehand
its not terrible if the game will never actually be shown and the results are going to be announced immediately after (like an MLG)
|
I don't see why you guys are complaining.
He clearly detailed what he was linking and warned not to click on it if you don't want the results spoiled. Some people aren't at a computer at the moment to watch these games but have the ability to read forums.
Stop nitpicking.
|
he cant lose this game after that start 
edit:
oh well, a terran with iq above that of a sea gull; using emp vs mass infestor
|
On August 17 2012 13:25 nkr wrote:he cant lose this game after that start edit: oh well, a terran with iq above that of a sea gull; using emp vs mass infestor
in a 200/200 vs 200/200 that might be true, but kawaii did a great job sneaking those ghosts behind idras army to EMP them...
he had no overseer, kept infestors clumped after getting EMP'd, this is just terrible control from him...
|
Yea, his control/engagements are still lacking. Game 1 he let banelings hit tanks tanks alot and Game 3 was very sloppy. Kawaii did play better than expected though.
|
On August 17 2012 12:53 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2012 12:49 Rulker wrote:On August 17 2012 12:47 Forikorder wrote:On August 17 2012 12:38 Rulker wrote:On August 17 2012 12:30 CeriseCherries wrote:
^i think its frowned upon to distribute knowledge of nonplayed games and what do you mean nonplayed? deliberately look for it this i jsut want it to be said i still think its a douche move to stalk profiles like that to figure out tournaments beforehand its not terrible if the game will never actually be shown and the results are going to be announced immediately after (like an MLG)
It's not a huge deal so long as it's not spoiled within the post. All he did was post the link for those who wanted to click it. No harm, no foul.
|
KIM IS DRUNK WITH POWER IN THE SKYPE CHAT DONALD
|
On August 17 2012 13:55 mambar wrote:
KIM IS DRUNK WITH POWER IN THE SKYPE CHAT DONALD
THEY ARE FUCKIN SPAMMING LIKE FUCKIN CRAZY DUDE
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
