|
If you come in here looking for "anime recommendations" then please refer to this chart before posting: Anime Recommendations (as of may 2014). We also have an IRC channel called #tladt where we all hang out. The channel is on Rizon, not QuakeNet! Feel free to check it out. TLADT discord is Discord.ggFor currently airing anime, please see Anichart.net |
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard.
But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou.
Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases.
|
On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases.
Unfortunately I don't know anyone in there who can be considered a full fledged ojou,
|
I dont like Rie tsunderes
|
On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere.
|
On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases.
No but you might like Margery Daw .. although that has nothing to do with any of this..
also I cant wrap my head around the No.6 opp.. the singers voice is annoying but at the same time I like it and the Op.. its hard to explain :S
|
On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances.
|
Carnival Phantasm 4!!! I cant wait for 5 since we get to vote on the outcome of Tohno and Emiya quest for a harem end or not! I checked the website and it pretty unanimous already.
If you watch the preview of the next episode at the end they said something about Season 2....so does that mean were not going to be expecting another episode until a while?
|
On September 02 2011 08:51 SheaR619 wrote: Carnival Phantasm 4!!! I cant wait for 5 since we get to vote on the outcome of Tohno and Emiya quest for a harem end or not! I checked the website and it pretty unanimous already.
If you watch the preview of the next episode at the end they said something about Season 2....so does that mean were not going to be expecting another episode until a while? 5 is Season 2 though, might take a long time
|
On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere.
|
Canada4481 Posts
On September 02 2011 07:52 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Unfortunately I don't know anyone in there who can be considered a full fledged ojou,
Would Konoe Fumina be considered ojou??
|
On September 02 2011 09:17 KazeHydra wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere. Kotobuki Nanase ftw, now if only more people read Bungaku Shoujo.
|
On September 02 2011 10:08 Ecael wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:17 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere. Kotobuki Nanase ftw, now if only more people read Bungaku Shoujo. I always open a chapter and then close it because reading is a pain in the ass, VN version please
|
On September 02 2011 10:22 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:08 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 09:17 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere. Kotobuki Nanase ftw, now if only more people read Bungaku Shoujo. I always open a chapter and then close it because reading is a pain in the ass, VN version please Fuck you, now go read because even Ferrose has read vol 1 in English.
|
I just finished Rec (TV) and thought it was pretty good. It's really short, but it's enjoyable and pretty cute.
|
Finished xxxHolic and all the OVA as well. Overall, it was quiet depressing. + Show Spoiler +I just felt so bad for the main character cause he never got anything in the end. All the woman who he loves have to marry someone else cause he is forever stuck within the shop and one of the girl married his best friend but still loves him. He going to live forever waiting forever waiting for Yuuko never return.
I hate the cross relm shit with Tsubasa, that shit was confusing as hellllllll. I guess if you watch Tsubasa it might make sense. Yet this was a very interesting choice by the writer.
|
Char's Counterattack was kinda gay. I love Amuro, and I'm all for the good ol' Amuro v Char stuff. That part was amazingly well done. But the movie really could have done without Quess and Hathaway. God dammit Sunrise, why does every Gundam have to be ruined by stupid kids who have no business even being there?
|
On September 02 2011 11:19 Ferrose wrote: Char's Counterattack was kinda gay. I love Amuro, and I'm all for the good ol' Amuro v Char stuff. That part was amazingly well done. But the movie really could have done without Quess and Hathaway. God dammit Sunrise, why does every Gundam have to be ruined by stupid kids who have no business even being there? "Kinda gay" *gives it 7/10, aka a decent score* Is that so. I wouldn't say "ruined", but Quess and Hathaway definitely hurt it. Still a good movie, though.
|
On September 02 2011 11:27 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 11:19 Ferrose wrote: Char's Counterattack was kinda gay. I love Amuro, and I'm all for the good ol' Amuro v Char stuff. That part was amazingly well done. But the movie really could have done without Quess and Hathaway. God dammit Sunrise, why does every Gundam have to be ruined by stupid kids who have no business even being there? "Kinda gay" *gives it 7/10, aka a decent score* Is that so. I wouldn't say "ruined", but Quess and Hathaway definitely hurt it. Still a good movie, though.
It was kinda gay, but Amuro v Char is so awesome that they carried to movie to decency.
I think ruined was the wrong word, but every fucking Gundam has stupid kids who have no relevance to the plot that have to take precious time away from everyone else being awesome. And it pisses me off.
On September 02 2011 10:22 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:08 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 09:17 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere. Kotobuki Nanase ftw, now if only more people read Bungaku Shoujo. I always open a chapter and then close it because reading is a pain in the ass, VN version please
C'mon, Blast. Bungaku Shoujo is legit. And it's in English, so you can't pull your "lol wut do dese kanas say im illiterate" bullshit.
|
On September 02 2011 11:35 Ferrose wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 11:27 Sentenal wrote:On September 02 2011 11:19 Ferrose wrote: Char's Counterattack was kinda gay. I love Amuro, and I'm all for the good ol' Amuro v Char stuff. That part was amazingly well done. But the movie really could have done without Quess and Hathaway. God dammit Sunrise, why does every Gundam have to be ruined by stupid kids who have no business even being there? "Kinda gay" *gives it 7/10, aka a decent score* Is that so. I wouldn't say "ruined", but Quess and Hathaway definitely hurt it. Still a good movie, though. It was kinda gay, but Amuro v Char is so awesome that they carried to movie to decency. I think ruined was the wrong word, but every fucking Gundam has stupid kids who have no relevance to the plot that have to take precious time away from everyone else being awesome. And it pisses me off. Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:22 Blasterion wrote:On September 02 2011 10:08 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 09:17 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 08:46 Ecael wrote:On September 02 2011 08:12 KazeHydra wrote:On September 02 2011 07:40 MoonBear wrote:On September 02 2011 05:03 Ecael wrote: Don't fool yourself, Taiga is horrible too, the only reason that Toradora might be worth some time would be because of Ami. Hm. Taiga was alright I thought. For a Rie Tsundere, she had a lot of background and depth. Some of the scenes made me go Kyaaaa~ as well. Maybe my standards for tsunderes are too low. Perhaps I should start using Tohsaka as the standard. But Ami #1. Deep personality, and semi-ojou. Confession: Never watched Shana. Is it worth it? If there is a good ojou, I consider that a large enough mitigating factor in most cases. Well, the vast majority of tsunderes are pretty bad. They usually have the problem of being tsun 90-99% of the time, have little to no character development, and the anime as a whole is generally just bad to begin with. Kugimiya Rie's best roles are just a step above that, but otherwise are just as bad because she's become the go-to seiyuu for tsundere. This was actually the topic being discussed in the earlier parts of that IRC log, basically people seem to be looking at more the quality or the levels of tsun rather than occurances. Which is understandable. I much prefer Shana's level of tsun to Louise's sadistic physical abuse. I think most people have just gotten accustomed to the general lack of dere in today's average tsundere. Kotobuki Nanase ftw, now if only more people read Bungaku Shoujo. I always open a chapter and then close it because reading is a pain in the ass, VN version please C'mon, Blast. Bungaku Shoujo is legit. And it's in English, so you can't pull your "lol wut do dese kanas say im illiterate" bullshit.
I think the girl in Gundam Wing Endless Waltz is a great example.
|
I don't remember. I watched Wing so long ago. I was like 7 years old man.
|
|
|
|