Anime Discussion Thread - Page 1043

On April 29 2011 08:46 Souma wrote:
No need to be an ass, Sentenal. We can laugh at whatever we like, too, therefore we can call whatever we want comedy!

On April 29 2011 08:49 Sentenal wrote:
If you guys want to pretend its funny, knock yourself out. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

On April 29 2011 08:48 Skilledblob wrote:
a lacking sense of humor does not remove the anime from its genre

you think it wasnt funny? That's fine with me but it doesnt change the fact that Lucky star is a comedy

On April 29 2011 09:46 fusionsdf wrote:


not my fault you have bad taste

On April 29 2011 09:49 Sentenal wrote:

Cool, so you agree with me that the show lacks a sense of humor. Since we agree on that point, that the show lacks a sense of humor, then the only reason you can be saying that its a comedy, is if its un-intentionally funny, sort of how Yosuga no Sora was funny. Still, I disagree it was unintentionally funny. "Konata-is-an-Otaku" 'jokes' recycled over and over again were never funny. It wasn't even "so bad that its funny" funny.


Was I blaming you for my taste in anime?

On April 29 2011 11:27 eduh wrote:

i think he was trying to say you have no sense of humor.
i never saw lucky star, but you just said it had "jokes" in it, so guess it qualifies as a comedy. even if a bad one.

anyway this kind of discussion is fucking retarded. you cant argue someone out of finding something funny.

On April 29 2011 06:35 fusionsdf wrote:

Ferrose: So few people actually watched Hourou Musuko. It was brutally unappreciated. I'll be surprised if even a third of the people here even watched it.

On April 29 2011 06:50 tonight wrote:


Haha, he says there is one good show per-season and you rebuttal with "WHAT, THERE ARE CLEARLY TWO!"

Even though for me there were 3 or so last season that I enjoyed, but it's really whatever your interests are.

On April 29 2011 08:38 Sentenal wrote:

People are free to like whatever anime they want, but you shouldn't put anime into genres that is clearly isn't a part of. Comedys require comedy, and Lucky Star had none. You don't see me calling Getter Robo a romance between crazy people and the Getter, do you?

On April 29 2011 11:52 Ferrose wrote:


Yeah, it got like record low ratings. But quite a few of us here have actually seen it. We have some tasteful posters in the ADT B)

On April 29 2011 14:05 fusionsdf wrote:


At least the manga has an official hardcover coming out. Still, its sad that people saw the premise and went 'ew I'm not watching that.' Haven't seen it in this thread, but I've sure seen it a lot at other places.

Its funny. The non-trans people I recommend it to won't watch it for that reason, and the trans people won't watch it because of the abundance of triggers.

On April 29 2011 14:11 Ferrose wrote:


There wasn't much talk about it because well...we couldn't find much to talk about with that show

But I don't know why you'd be turned off on the show because the protag likes the crossdress. It's a wonderful discussion on gender.

On April 29 2011 07:54 Sentenal wrote:

Since when was Lucky Star a comedy? Doesn't it have to be funny, in order to be a comedy?