EPTOfficial 'what is Dota anymore' discussion - Page 2254
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:50 crms wrote: this brawl mode in top deck moba is fucking retarded. Did they even test rag vs nef? Blizzard fucking lost it. I had people just concede instantly if they are playing as rag lmao Blizzard clearly had zero quality control for this tavern brawl | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
"hey intern make some bullshit for free so they dont complain everything costs money here" | ||
|
Mecha King Ghidorah
United States595 Posts
DOTA2 is streaking ahead to become best MOBA That will never happen since Dota isn't a MOBA. Holy shit read this on LoL reddit and I cant stop laughing. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:54 Mecha King Ghidorah wrote: + Show Spoiler + DOTA2 is streaking ahead to become best MOBA That will never happen since Dota isn't a MOBA. Holy shit read this on LoL reddit and I cant stop laughing. What does MOBA even mean? Is it the new-aged word for AoS? | ||
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:50 dismiss wrote: No Assessing how well a health system does its job requires dealing with two large questions. The first is how to measure the outcomes of interest – that is, to determine what is achieved with respect to the three objectives of good health, respon- siveness and fair financial contribution ( attainment ). The second is how to compare those attainments with what the system should be able to accomplish – that is, the best that could be achieved with the same resources ( performance Yeah, I don't care about this way of measuring how good healthcare is. From patient and illness perspective, if you can afford it, it's better. | ||
|
tehh4ck3r
Magrathea7084 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:53 IntoTheheart wrote: Do you pay gold/resources to play in Tavern Brawl? no it's free, you get a pack for winning it's really not that bad, I've played 3 games as rag and won 2 of them | ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:49 Plansix wrote: The grass is always greener, blah, blah blah. I liked league too, but the nerf bat drove me away. the funniest thing I find about this is that they're going to be switching to a game that has the exact same problems with development and assuming a new engine is going to make gameplay that much better it's the same shit, different toilet just far less smelly btw I'd like to add that I would vote for gaben if he ran for pres | ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:55 IntoTheheart wrote: What does MOBA even mean? Is it the new-aged word for AoS? It's a catch-all term that people just decided to use for Dota-like games. I mean, Multiplayer online battle arena, even fucking TF2 fits that. | ||
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
basically, the person that said that has literally no clue (the proper term which people hate is probably A-RTS but thats another argument) | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:55 tehh4ck3r wrote: no it's free, you get a pack for winning it's really not that bad, I've played 3 games as rag and won 2 of them It's nice to see that I can get packs super easily now. | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:55 TanGeng wrote: Yeah, I don't care about this way of measuring how good healthcare is. From patient and illness perspective, if you can afford it, it's better. "USA #1 Healthcare". Is presented with an extensive study from a credible, neutral source showing your previous assessment was inaccurate. "I DONT CARE ABOUT IT LALALALAL." Typical LD staff behaviour. | ||
|
HighTimeDotA
Canada1412 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:50 dismiss wrote: No Assessing how well a health system does its job requires dealing with two large questions. The first is how to measure the outcomes of interest – that is, to determine what is achieved with respect to the three objectives of good health, respon- siveness and fair financial contribution ( attainment ). The second is how to compare those attainments with what the system should be able to accomplish – that is, the best that could be achieved with the same resources ( performance What class did u learn this from lmao. BTW America has better healthcare if u got deep pockets. They literally ninja all our top tier doctors by throwing them mountains of cash. My ex cardiologist got offered 500k a year to work stateside lmao | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
kupo aside | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:59 HighTimeDotA wrote: What class did u learn this from lmao. BTW America has better healthcare if u got deep pockets. They literally ninja all our top tier doctors by throwing them mountains of cash. My ex cardiologist got offered 500k a year to work stateside lmao I think that it was pulled from the report, which also explains the formatting. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:59 HighTimeDotA wrote: What class did u learn this from lmao. BTW America has better healthcare if u got deep pockets. They literally ninja all our top tier doctors by throwing them mountains of cash. My ex cardiologist got offered 500k a year to work stateside lmao Pretty much... | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
On June 18 2015 04:50 dismiss wrote: No Assessing how well a health system does its job requires dealing with two large questions. The first is how to measure the outcomes of interest – that is, to determine what is achieved with respect to the three objectives of good health, respon- siveness and fair financial contribution ( attainment ). The second is how to compare those attainments with what the system should be able to accomplish – that is, the best that could be achieved with the same resources ( performance This report has literally nothing to do with TanGengs point. His point is that if you're a bazillionaire, there is no better place to get medical attention than the USA. Which is undoubtedly true. The healthcare system as a whole (overall performance, responsiveness, efficiency, fair financial contribution, etc) is ridiculous but if you're top .001%er it's irrelevant to you. None of those factors matter (resource cost, price per performance index etc) if you can write a blank check to the top hospitals/clinics/research centers/doctors. | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
On June 18 2015 05:01 crms wrote: This report has literally nothing to do with TanGengs point. His point is that if you're a bazillionaire, there is no better place to get medical attention than the USA. Which is undoubtedly true. The healthcare system as a whole (overall performance, responsiveness, efficiency, fair financial contribution, etc) is ridiculous but if you're top .001%er it's irrelevant to you. None of those factors matter (resource cost, price per performance index etc) if you can write a blank check to the top hospitals/clinics/research centers/doctors. But that has nothing to do with healthcare. If you have literally unlimited ressources you just ship all the idiots to your vacation home on a pacific island. That's not even to say that the majority of really prestigious private hospitals are not in the US. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
| ||
