EPTGeneral Discussion - Page 4614
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
Kuroeeah
11696 Posts
| ||
|
Kuroeeah
11696 Posts
| ||
|
EnumaAvalon
Philippines3613 Posts
On December 29 2013 21:34 Kuroeeah wrote: So we've settled in with the patch but have you guys warmed up to the buyback change at all where you can't get unreliable gold? Like it's sometimes in my blood to rage back. I love it. It teaches restraint and abstinence. JUST LIKE REAL LIFE! On December 29 2013 21:40 Kuroeeah wrote: Also wtf is that bug where you can see an attack projectile even in fog. It's actually retarder, Mirana/Nature's Prophet attacking jungle creeps was visible in separate instances. Haven't seen that yet. Hmm. Should roam my cam when I'm dead. | ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
| ||
|
wairai
Malaysia1000 Posts
| ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On December 30 2013 01:06 cecek wrote: I really wonder if people are satisfied that there's ranked matchmaking in Dota 2 now. I have a feeling that the same people who were saying "I want to see my actual skill level and my progression, I will get that from ladder/ranked MM" are the people who are now bitching about ranked and saying that they're placed lower than they should be. "Be careful what you wish for," is pretty much the moral of ranked match making. Shockingly, it did not create a utopia of Dota where all tryhards can play like Na'vi every game. | ||
|
swedewannabe
Sweden28 Posts
| ||
|
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
On December 30 2013 01:06 cecek wrote: I really wonder if people are satisfied that there's ranked matchmaking in Dota 2 now. I have a feeling that the same people who were saying "I want to see my actual skill level and my progression, I will get that from ladder/ranked MM" are the people who are now bitching about ranked and saying that they're placed lower than they should be. Yea probably not, I can now understand Valve. They took so much time to implement visible mmr just because of how a simple number can affect people's mentalities so much ~_~ But then again there's no 700+ comment threads on reddit to remove visible rating... ~ | ||
|
Aixler
Netherlands946 Posts
| ||
|
[]Phase[]
Belgium927 Posts
| ||
|
MidgetExplosion
United States137 Posts
| ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
On December 30 2013 01:06 cecek wrote: I really wonder if people are satisfied that there's ranked matchmaking in Dota 2 now. I have a feeling that the same people who were saying "I want to see my actual skill level and my progression, I will get that from ladder/ranked MM" are the people who are now bitching about ranked and saying that they're placed lower than they should be. Am I happy there is a ranked matchmaking in the game now ? Yes. Am I satisfied by it ? No. Why ? Because whoever had the idea to allow stacks of 2-3-4 people in ranked MM is a retard and should be fired. | ||
|
BurningSera
Ireland19621 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + (i was the first pick and i did solo hardlane spec plus supporting the team (1ward 3-5 sentries and then 1 gem, and look at that LH LOL) The dire had this game in early but for whatever reason they keep making 3/4 men pubtrain and furi was the biggest victim ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MO5MiAC.png) 'BurningSera's adventure in the russian wonderland'. | ||
|
MidgetExplosion
United States137 Posts
On December 30 2013 03:39 BlitzerSC wrote: Am I happy there is a ranked matchmaking in the game now ? Yes. Am I satisfied by it ? No. Why ? Because whoever had the idea to allow stacks of 2-3-4 people in ranked MM is a retard and should be fired. Meh, I agree to some extent. Though a lot of time you play with or against a stack of 3-4 it's almost like playing a game 3v5 or 4v5 cuz the 1 or 2 random people that get put on your team do nothing to help all game and you lose, haha... Or the other team gets that and you win. In my experience queuing with 1-2 people or all 5 is much more even. 3-4 always seems like a really hard fought battle if it's your team, and easy if it's there's. 3 is just awful, always feels like the 3 of you are all on the same page trying hard to win and the other two are just off doing whatever... I lose SO many games 3 stacked... Just my personal experience, though. | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
I honestly would like to see screenshots of the extremely unfair matchups you people are whining about. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
The problem with stacks is 2- or 3-stacks that have a really wide MMR spread which makes it hard to match a good game. Which is not really a problem exclusive to ranked. | ||
|
MidgetExplosion
United States137 Posts
On December 30 2013 03:55 cecek wrote: Do you people actually run into something extreme like 5x solo against a fivestack or something? So far I've seen it be very equal every time... 4+1 vs 3+2, 1+2+2 vs 3+1+1, 5x solo vs 1+1+1+2 etc. All of which are perfectly fine, imo. I honestly would like to see screenshots of the extremely unfair matchups you people are whining about. I would be fine with all these as well as long as I won. If I lost, then it was bullshit! :D | ||
|
MidgetExplosion
United States137 Posts
On December 30 2013 03:59 TheYango wrote: 5x solo vs. 5-stack should be fine because of how party MMR being separate from solo MMR means the 5-stack's MMR is appropriately adjusted. You get a shittier 5-stack against stronger individual players and it eventually works. The problem with stacks is 2- or 3-stacks that have a really wide MMR spread which makes it hard to match a good game. Which is not really a problem exclusive to ranked. They would have to really compensate for a 5-stack vs 5x solo... It's crazy how much teamwork gives you an advantage in DOTA, it's really really crazy how much that effects the outcome of a game. | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
| ||
