EPTGeneral Discussion - Page 3513
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
Dattish
Sweden6297 Posts
| ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
Incze
Romania2058 Posts
Absurdly strong skill by itself | ||
|
tapes
487 Posts
On August 04 2013 21:46 Mataza wrote: To be more precise about the (4) of xboct, it's his rating as a carry. While Na'Vi received 8-10 on all other criteria, that's what they gave him. I'm pretty sure that they got a 6 for solo as well (dendi and funn1k). | ||
|
ReignSupreme.
Australia4123 Posts
On August 04 2013 21:56 Unleashing wrote: Who made that shitty rating? Edit: Nvm read further up that it was BTS. What the shit. It was a 4, as in 4th best. Not 4/10 | ||
|
Incze
Romania2058 Posts
| ||
|
Souone
Brazil470 Posts
On August 04 2013 21:56 Unleashing wrote: Who made that shitty rating? Edit: Nvm read further up that it was BTS. What the shit. The rating was made based on all the 10 teams present on the alienware cup, meaning each of the 10 teams get a 1 to 10 rating and the ratings can't repeat (i.e. if Burning is 10 as a carry, no other team can have a 10). That means BTS thought there were 5 better carries in the competition then XBOCT, if you consider the field had the likes of Burning, Zhou, Sylar, Hao and Yamateh amongst others, it is not that much of a stretch. | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
On August 04 2013 21:56 Unleashing wrote: Who made that shitty rating? Edit: Nvm read further up that it was BTS. What the shit. Afaik what happened was that they first they gave the rating in comparison to the other carries in that tournament, and since Burning and the others are so good they gave Xboct a terrible rating | ||
|
ViZe
United States1513 Posts
On August 04 2013 22:19 Yoshi- wrote: Afaik what happened was that they first they gave the rating in comparison to the other carries in that tournament, and since Burning and the others are so good they gave Xboct a terrible rating Yeh 2GD came on the show and criticized their ratings hexagons because he felt that there should be a spread and not every stat should be >7 - according to him you can only have 10's if you also have 1's. So they went and tried to compensate (i.e. Na'Vi gets a 4 for their carry, DK gets like a 2 or a 1 for creativity) and they get flamed. They have since stopped using hexagons | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
| ||
|
Cool Cat
United States1644 Posts
On July 21 2012 00:46 tube wrote: holy crap bloodseeker is so good once you get force staff its impossible to not go godlike, rupture force is so imbalanced guys try it On July 21 2012 01:24 tube wrote: they're gonna pick bs in the next international what a prophet | ||
|
ChunderBoy
3242 Posts
On August 04 2013 21:40 Bleak wrote: A friend of mine who's a big Dota fan, who used to play back in 2003-2004, told me some weird shit about how game used to be. I thought I'd share and see who remembers this. -Pudge apparently used to summon many small creatures (if you played WC3, I think they probably were locusts) who had 10 hp but had 90% evasion or something, which meant he could push like crazy. He didn't have hook at this point. -There was a hero called Gambler which was removed. I read his skills in Playdota forums and apparently everything he did depended on how much gold he and other team's heroes have. I forgot about the details but he had a skill that could potentially hit for 2500, but also lose the same amount of gold. -When Invoker had 27 spells, he could make everyone invisible around him and turn an enemy hero back to his team, like mind control. (O.o) - Naix was an agility hero with built in attack speed, life steal, damage and I think also a form of rage or speed buff. Can't remember exactly the details right now, but his strength growth was apparently low or something, I don't really remember it. Does anyone remember these? What other stuff you can tell? Naix wasn't agility, he was strength... He just had a really high agi gain like 4.15 if I'm not mistaken, and his str gain was really low... | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
On August 04 2013 22:44 ChunderBoy wrote: Naix wasn't agility, he was strength... He just had a really high agi gain like 4.15 if I'm not mistaken, and his str gain was really low... lvl 10 was cap bone fletcher's ult was one huge aoe arrow lol invoker had invisibility aura which was fun lolol | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsQs6Kae17qFdHNaeHFfM0JPNHlxdkZMNUJHTXRESEE#gid=0 any thoughts on which we could imrpove? | ||
|
Cool Cat
United States1644 Posts
it's no fun if there's so little risk involved | ||
|
Dattish
Sweden6297 Posts
| ||
|
teapoted
United Kingdom24425 Posts
On August 04 2013 22:29 ViZe wrote: I told them to stop fucking with the hexagons and taking them so seriously.Yeh 2GD came on the show and criticized their ratings hexagons because he felt that there should be a spread and not every stat should be >7 - according to him you can only have 10's if you also have 1's. So they went and tried to compensate (i.e. Na'Vi gets a 4 for their carry, DK gets like a 2 or a 1 for creativity) and they get flamed. They have since stopped using hexagons Now we have no more hexagons. First GDStudio ruined twitch chat and now they take away our hexagon. | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
On August 05 2013 00:18 LemOn wrote: dota network down again better now than during the games | ||
| ||
