|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
I see what people mean by "deflecting".
It's hardly arguable that Trump is a racist by any standard regardless of how you wanna spin it. He's not a "basically a racist because he's a white man", he's basically a racist because he is fucking racist. And, to make that a little more clear, just pardoned one of the biggest and influential racists of your country.
I don't understand why you feel the urge to deflect to something really idiotic and then complain why people fuck you over for it.
|
|
I'm starting to wonder if he actually has some form of disconnect with reality. As in, a proper medical condition.
|
He sees this hurricane as just another sporting event, something to gather crowds and drum up ratings. A major natural disaster that has uprooted the lives of millions of people, and he can't be arsed to take it even remotely seriously. All he gives a damn about are his stupid crowd sizes. Totally not compensating here.
|
On August 30 2017 03:53 m4ini wrote: I see what people mean by "deflecting".
It's hardly arguable that Trump is a racist by any standard regardless of how you wanna spin it. He's not a "basically a racist because he's a white man", he's basically a racist because he is fucking racist. And, to make that a little more clear, just pardoned one of the biggest and influential racists of your country.
I don't understand why you feel the urge to deflect to something really idiotic and then complain why people fuck you over for it. If you constantly challenge the definition of racism and what makes someone racist, then no one every talks about racism itself.
I just listened to that on NPR and the entire thing is surreal.
|
On August 30 2017 03:49 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:37 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:24 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:20 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 02:44 Doodsmack wrote:On August 30 2017 01:53 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 00:18 Doodsmack wrote: If things really go south during Trump's term, which is entirely conceivable, the non-racist/non-birther portion of his voters will very much regret their choice. At that point, the "liberal attitudes are offensive" argument falls apart as a defensible position. They took too large of a risk on competence - on a fake tanned, hair dyed and veneer-teethed showbiz personality, no less. Still missing the point. They'd regret being forced into that choice, but still no closer to supporting the party that hated their guts and will slander them to make political points. Binary choices, remember. The result of the incompetence would be too great, meaning that in this case, voting for the opposing party would have been a better result for them. In other words, they made the wrong choice in the binary choice. But your obligatory claims of people missing the point are pretty funny when you are just wrong on that. No, you whitewash Hillary in the aftermath of her loss. A liar that rewards her friends, lights fires in North Africa, and deletes emails she doesn't want the FBI to get their mitts on can be seen as a worse result. We deserve better management of corruption? She also thinks you're deplorable, and probably doesn't do much thinking of your situation if you aren't a woman or a minority. So basically Trump in almost every way? The guy you voted for and continue to whitewash. More competent in her corruption and administration, greater corruption and abuse of power. So you voted for an incompetent and racist version of the same thing? Incompetence instead of competence in destruction. And I voted for a white man for president; so basically he was a racist by the metric of some here. I'm hardly joking, it's a pejorative and understood as one, but by definition it really had joined fascist for actual meaning.
do you think "black man" or "white woman" or "asian woman" are pejorative or merely descriptive?
|
If you constantly challenge the definition of racism and what makes someone racist, then no one every talks about racism itself.
I actually couldn't define racism to a sufficient point. I know a racist if i see one for the most part, but i don't have a definition for what accounts as racism. I'm pretty sure that i'm racist every now and then by some definitions, and i crack the occasional racist (or Nazi-) joke, mostly based on stereotypes. Not based on skincolour though, but nationality.
Which is different than condoning institutionalised discrimination against latinos/blacks by a sheriff though.
|
On August 30 2017 04:04 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +If you constantly challenge the definition of racism and what makes someone racist, then no one every talks about racism itself.
I actually couldn't define racism to a sufficient point. I know a racist if i see one for the most part, but i don't have a definition for what accounts as racism. I'm pretty sure that i'm racist every now and then by some definitions, and i crack the occasional racist (or Nazi-) joke, mostly based on stereotypes. Not based on skincolour though, but nationality. Which is different than condoning institutionalised discrimination against latinos/blacks by a sheriff though.
Here. Is this racist? Here are some of Apraio's initially deleted emails that turned up at his trial.
|
On August 30 2017 04:04 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +If you constantly challenge the definition of racism and what makes someone racist, then no one every talks about racism itself.
I actually couldn't define racism to a sufficient point. I know a racist if i see one for the most part, but i don't have a definition for what accounts as racism. I'm pretty sure that i'm racist every now and then by some definitions, and i crack the occasional racist (or Nazi-) joke. Which is different than condoning institutionalised discrimination against latinos/blacks by a sheriff though. It is a broad and complex topic that is always evolving. The more systems we make to combat racism, the more the racists push against those systems. Overt racism is replaced by systems specific designed to target blacks and other minorities. The collection of voter data and complex voter models has made it even easier. MLK said over and over that the moderate white America was the greatest enemy to equality. And it proves true over and over in this thread.
|
On August 30 2017 04:08 Wulfey_LA wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2017 04:04 m4ini wrote:If you constantly challenge the definition of racism and what makes someone racist, then no one every talks about racism itself.
I actually couldn't define racism to a sufficient point. I know a racist if i see one for the most part, but i don't have a definition for what accounts as racism. I'm pretty sure that i'm racist every now and then by some definitions, and i crack the occasional racist (or Nazi-) joke, mostly based on stereotypes. Not based on skincolour though, but nationality. Which is different than condoning institutionalised discrimination against latinos/blacks by a sheriff though. Here. Is this racist? Here are some of Apraio's initially deleted emails that turned up at his trial. https://twitter.com/AClaudeCase/status/902582629840470016
Those are memes.
Jokes. Not jokes make you a racist, but in especially in case of Apraio, actions. But to satisfy your question: no, i actually don't think these are inherently racist. In the context of Apraio, of course. Because we know that he's a racist.
Here. + Show Spoiler +
Is that racist? That's what i'm trying to say. The context to me is rather important.
It is a broad and complex topic that is always evolving. The more systems we make to combat racism, the more the racists push against those systems.
I actually think this is partially the reason for itself. Racism is really not evolving, but people start to think "special snowflake" if constantly things get re-defined, that's when they start pushing against it.
I do think Obama should've cracked down on it way harder, this is a topic that needs to be sorted "once and for all", rather than "here a little, there a little".
|
I’ve known way to may racists who use racist jokes as the test to find out if they are in favorable company.
|
On August 30 2017 03:51 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2017 03:49 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:37 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:24 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:20 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 02:44 Doodsmack wrote:On August 30 2017 01:53 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 00:18 Doodsmack wrote: If things really go south during Trump's term, which is entirely conceivable, the non-racist/non-birther portion of his voters will very much regret their choice. At that point, the "liberal attitudes are offensive" argument falls apart as a defensible position. They took too large of a risk on competence - on a fake tanned, hair dyed and veneer-teethed showbiz personality, no less. Still missing the point. They'd regret being forced into that choice, but still no closer to supporting the party that hated their guts and will slander them to make political points. Binary choices, remember. The result of the incompetence would be too great, meaning that in this case, voting for the opposing party would have been a better result for them. In other words, they made the wrong choice in the binary choice. But your obligatory claims of people missing the point are pretty funny when you are just wrong on that. No, you whitewash Hillary in the aftermath of her loss. A liar that rewards her friends, lights fires in North Africa, and deletes emails she doesn't want the FBI to get their mitts on can be seen as a worse result. We deserve better management of corruption? She also thinks you're deplorable, and probably doesn't do much thinking of your situation if you aren't a woman or a minority. So basically Trump in almost every way? The guy you voted for and continue to whitewash. More competent in her corruption and administration, greater corruption and abuse of power. So you voted for an incompetent and racist version of the same thing? Incompetence instead of competence in destruction. And I voted for a white man for president; so basically he was a racist by the metric of some here. I'm hardly joking, it's a pejorative and understood as one, but by definition it really had joined fascist for actual meaning. “definition it really had joined fascist” Can you rephrase that please? I’m have a hard time parsing what you are trying to say. Fascist showed up in Orwell's essay on Politics and the English Language. He said it now existed as simply "something not desirable." When you posit the racist choice for president, or really which racist you wanted for president, I say the word similarly exists as something like "a person I disagree with personally or politically."
|
On August 30 2017 03:51 Gorsameth wrote: Hillary the warmonger, while Trump is trying to get the US into a war with NK and Iran and putting more bodies into Afghanistan.
Hillary the corrupt, while Trump reward every position around him to incompetent people who payed him. While he resides for his own property while the government pays for it.
Emails. Which are completely devoid of anything. Meanwhile the Meuller investigation keeps turning up shit after shit.
I don't know. Somehow the cries of "But Hillary" keep sounding weaker and weaker.
Somehow, "the grass is greener on the other side," is never quite apparent to the person staring that way.
|
|
On August 30 2017 04:04 IgnE wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2017 03:49 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:37 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:24 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:20 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 02:44 Doodsmack wrote:On August 30 2017 01:53 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 00:18 Doodsmack wrote: If things really go south during Trump's term, which is entirely conceivable, the non-racist/non-birther portion of his voters will very much regret their choice. At that point, the "liberal attitudes are offensive" argument falls apart as a defensible position. They took too large of a risk on competence - on a fake tanned, hair dyed and veneer-teethed showbiz personality, no less. Still missing the point. They'd regret being forced into that choice, but still no closer to supporting the party that hated their guts and will slander them to make political points. Binary choices, remember. The result of the incompetence would be too great, meaning that in this case, voting for the opposing party would have been a better result for them. In other words, they made the wrong choice in the binary choice. But your obligatory claims of people missing the point are pretty funny when you are just wrong on that. No, you whitewash Hillary in the aftermath of her loss. A liar that rewards her friends, lights fires in North Africa, and deletes emails she doesn't want the FBI to get their mitts on can be seen as a worse result. We deserve better management of corruption? She also thinks you're deplorable, and probably doesn't do much thinking of your situation if you aren't a woman or a minority. So basically Trump in almost every way? The guy you voted for and continue to whitewash. More competent in her corruption and administration, greater corruption and abuse of power. So you voted for an incompetent and racist version of the same thing? Incompetence instead of competence in destruction. And I voted for a white man for president; so basically he was a racist by the metric of some here. I'm hardly joking, it's a pejorative and understood as one, but by definition it really had joined fascist for actual meaning. do you think "black man" or "white woman" or "asian woman" are pejorative or merely descriptive? It depends on context. My dad is old and doesn't quite seem to get non-KKK/Nazi level racism. Sometimes he'll say black guy or blonde chick, sometimes he'll say some absolutely stupid stuff like "He was well spoken for a black guy." Which raises some alarms. I had to sit him down after Charlottesville and explain to him why people want the statues taken down and moved.
|
On August 30 2017 04:15 Plansix wrote: I’ve known way to may racists who use racist jokes as the test to find out if they are in favorable company.
Never cracked a joke about stereotypes? Or disabled people? edit: or gender?
I think, and don't get this wrong, that people like you are as big a part of the problem as racism itself. You're not helping by screamishly pointing at anyone who's cracking a race/nationality joke.
|
On August 30 2017 04:15 Plansix wrote: I’ve known way to may racists who use racist jokes as the test to find out if they are in favorable company.
Yes. Signalling. If they share back then you know you are among one of your own.
|
|
Is that what P6 linked a day or two back, or something new to be pissed off about?
|
On August 30 2017 04:15 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2017 03:51 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:49 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:37 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 03:24 Plansix wrote:On August 30 2017 03:20 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 02:44 Doodsmack wrote:On August 30 2017 01:53 Danglars wrote:On August 30 2017 00:18 Doodsmack wrote: If things really go south during Trump's term, which is entirely conceivable, the non-racist/non-birther portion of his voters will very much regret their choice. At that point, the "liberal attitudes are offensive" argument falls apart as a defensible position. They took too large of a risk on competence - on a fake tanned, hair dyed and veneer-teethed showbiz personality, no less. Still missing the point. They'd regret being forced into that choice, but still no closer to supporting the party that hated their guts and will slander them to make political points. Binary choices, remember. The result of the incompetence would be too great, meaning that in this case, voting for the opposing party would have been a better result for them. In other words, they made the wrong choice in the binary choice. But your obligatory claims of people missing the point are pretty funny when you are just wrong on that. No, you whitewash Hillary in the aftermath of her loss. A liar that rewards her friends, lights fires in North Africa, and deletes emails she doesn't want the FBI to get their mitts on can be seen as a worse result. We deserve better management of corruption? She also thinks you're deplorable, and probably doesn't do much thinking of your situation if you aren't a woman or a minority. So basically Trump in almost every way? The guy you voted for and continue to whitewash. More competent in her corruption and administration, greater corruption and abuse of power. So you voted for an incompetent and racist version of the same thing? Incompetence instead of competence in destruction. And I voted for a white man for president; so basically he was a racist by the metric of some here. I'm hardly joking, it's a pejorative and understood as one, but by definition it really had joined fascist for actual meaning. “definition it really had joined fascist” Can you rephrase that please? I’m have a hard time parsing what you are trying to say. Fascist showed up in Orwell's essay on Politics and the English Language. He said it now existed as simply "something not desirable." When you posit the racist choice for president, or really which racist you wanted for president, I say the word similarly exists as something like "a person I disagree with personally or politically." I’ve said this before: but I am convinced a man could burn a cross on Obama’s lawn and you would still question if that man was racist. Your refusal to engage with the word makes further discussion of this topic pointless.
|
|
|
|