EPTShe most likely is, good for her.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4690
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
She most likely is, good for her. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28794 Posts
ye, if anything it shouldve read 'can't believe trump is so scary people are voting for her'.  | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
She's all of the worst parts of Obama amplified and all the best parts muted. It's like Democrats don't even realize that the coalition that stood strongest behind her were the same Dems that prevented Obama from making progress on stuff that may endanger Republicans with D's next to their names. On August 10 2016 08:18 Liquid`Drone wrote: ye, if anything it shouldve read 'can't believe trump is so scary people are voting for her'. That works  | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:21 ragz_gt wrote: I kinda get you, but you are asking why people are too scared of someone who casually joked about assassinating his opponent (I don't think he is serious, not that makes it ok).... I think the answer is kind of obvious. I think a couple people have pointed out the real danger of Trump isn't him winning, it's him inciting something among his supporters as a result of losing. Trump's made it pretty clear he wouldn't actually do any of the work of the president and Pence would basically be his Cheney. Trump isn't what's scary, it's the America that nominated him that scares me, they aren't going anywhere win or lose. On August 10 2016 08:23 Plansix wrote: If I am going to vote my conscience, I'm going to vote for Clinton. Because my conscience is the thing that prevents me from doing self-serving shit at the risk of other people. What risks to "other people" are you imagining come with a Johnson or Stein administration? I know the reality of what Clinton's choices did to countless families and I'm not seeing that from either of them. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:24 GreenHorizons wrote: I think a couple people have pointed out the real danger of Trump isn't him winning, it's him inciting something among his supporters as a result of losing. Trump's made it pretty clear he wouldn't actually do any of the work of the president and Pence would basically be his Cheney. Trump isn't what's scary, it's the America that nominated him that scares me, they aren't going anywhere win or lose. And you think vulnerable people in society wouldn't suffer from Pence being president instead of Clinton? You see no distinction there? | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:24 GreenHorizons wrote: I think a couple people have pointed out the real danger of Trump isn't him winning, it's him inciting something among his supporters as a result of losing. Trump's made it pretty clear he wouldn't actually do any of the work of the president and Pence would basically be his Cheney. Trump isn't what's scary, it's the America that nominated him that scares me, they aren't going anywhere win or lose. Well, I do miss Finland a lot... | ||
|
CAPSLOCKED
563 Posts
On August 10 2016 07:57 Plansix wrote: Never forget she wore a necklace made of bullets on national TV representing Trump. The Robocop parody continues. ![[image loading]](http://thehill.com/sites/default/files/blogs/piersonbullet.png) I am glad that the GOP has picked an nominee that reminds us that assassinations of his opponents are possible and always a threat. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ This election blows. Clinton is corruption personified. Trump's rhetoric is so over the top it's as if he's bored and not even trying to win. Johnson is just another in the long line of naive globalists. What's an independent to do? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
And I remember that primary season and it was nasty on both sides. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:26 Mohdoo wrote: And you think vulnerable people in society wouldn't suffer from Pence being president instead of Clinton? You see no distinction there? I think vulnerable people in society are f'd this election. I guarantee that the top 1% (more specifically the top .01%) will continue to get a larger share of wealth and power under either of those two. Fracking (and the associated environmental damage) will continue to get worse, racist policing will continue to get worse, other forms of environmental racism will continue to get worse,Israel/Palestine conflict will get worse, the other middle east/north Africa conflicts will continue to get worse, the list goes on. People justifying their vote for Hillary by claiming "it's the best choice for the oppressed" are lying to themselves. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:41 On_Slaught wrote: I can't help but laugh at the fact that even when Trump says something stupid and dangerous that he is still factually wrong. Killing Hillary wouldnt stop their nominations. In fact, it would probably fast track the nomination of hyper liberal judges under Kaine. Why in the world would Kaine (a moderate) nominate hyper liberal judges though? | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45815 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:24 GreenHorizons wrote: What risks to "other people" are you imagining come with a Johnson or Stein administration? I know the reality of what Clinton's choices did to countless families and I'm not seeing that from either of them. There's no such thing as a Johnson or Stein administration though :/ zero chance of them winning. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:44 GreenHorizons wrote: Why in the world would Kaine (a moderate) nominate hyper liberal judges though? Because his partner was just assassinated and he would obviously follow her wishes to honor her memory? | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:44 GreenHorizons wrote: Why in the world would Kaine (a moderate) nominate hyper liberal judges though? If you strike me down I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. | ||
|
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:45 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: There's no such thing as a Johnson or Stein administration though :/ zero chance of them winning. That's my point. Outside of the context of Trump winning (this was presupposing he doesn't have a chance) the "lesser evil" argument falls apart. Hillary needs Trump to be the only alternative, if he's not the prime alternative, her entire campaign needs redirecting. On August 10 2016 08:46 On_Slaught wrote: Because his partner was just assassinated and he would obviously follow her wishes to honor her memory? She's also a "proud moderate", where are people getting these visions of hyper liberal judges from? No one thinks Hillary is to the left of Obama on pretty much anything, why would she go any more liberal than the judge her husband nominated originally and Obama has put up for the Supreme Court? | ||
|
oBlade
United States6107 Posts
On August 10 2016 08:41 On_Slaught wrote: I can't help but laugh at the fact that even when Trump says something stupid and dangerous that he is still factually wrong. Killing Hillary wouldnt stop their nominations. In fact, it would probably fast track the nomination of hyper liberal judges under Kaine. That's a good point, it wouldn't even make logical sense, so I won't take it all so seriously. | ||
| ||
