On October 30 2004 21:53 BigBalls wrote:
im sick of this topic already

who fucking cares what a progamers apm is. who cares what your own is.

lemme ask you this, lemme me ask you this....can you kick MY ass?

yep

on.sp33d

134 Posts

October 30 2004 12:56 GMT

#22

That's an interesting post. :D

So, if anyone can reach as high or higher than their favorite pro's APM, would it be worth even half as much? =)

karelen

Sweden2407 Posts

October 30 2004 13:01 GMT

#23

i dunno, 80-90 perhaps? also, i dont care

Twitt

United States733 Posts

October 30 2004 13:01 GMT

#24

Yes, but we're talking about bw here.

Sky101

United States1758 Posts

October 30 2004 13:06 GMT

#25

100.
Sometimes 90ish.

LumberJack

United States3355 Posts

October 30 2004 13:13 GMT

#26

on.sp33d, i dont really know u, but i really dont like you. smashing ctrl + button to get apm in the thousands, isnt exactly good ammo in an apm argument, not to mention its been said 34894358903 times, and ur opinion seems really dumb.

BigBalls

United States5354 Posts

October 30 2004 13:19 GMT

#27

On October 30 2004 21:56 hasuwar wrote:

Show nested quote +

yep

get some better taste in women before you even step up to the plate

ahk-gosu

Korea (South)2099 Posts

October 30 2004 13:19 GMT

#28

apm doesnt matter
the more important thing is how accurately you click and press.
this has been stated many times yes?

a lot of the actions that pro gamers do are useless clicking.

SiS

United States753 Posts

October 30 2004 13:22 GMT

#29

APM really doesnt mean anything

Heaven and Nada are about as fast as eachother [both 400 avg APM]

Look how good Nada is and look how bad Heaven is

:D

RuGbUg

United States2347 Posts

October 30 2004 13:29 GMT

#30

my apm is 490 when im trying

anything above that is useless clicks

Cambium

United States16368 Posts

October 30 2004 13:31 GMT

#31

Averaged 168 over 78 games.
Varies from 150 to 220 (higher if short).

IA-Taiyoushin

United States33 Posts

October 30 2004 13:31 GMT

#32

On October 30 2004 22:29 RuGbUg wrote:
my apm is 490 when im trying

anything above that is useless clicks

so are you saing that ur 490 has no useless clicks. reps?

SiS

United States753 Posts

October 30 2004 13:33 GMT

#33

I wonder what his definition of 'useless' is ....

WaitForIt

United States22 Posts

October 30 2004 13:33 GMT

#34

Most really good games are average 150-180...a lot of WCG 2004 people didn't go over 200 in some games they won....APM isn't everything...I could sit there hotkey Overlord and Hatchery and go back and forth and lose without doing shit, but have an APM of like 600 APM isn't everyything unless there is a point

RuGbUg

United States2347 Posts

October 30 2004 13:38 GMT

#35

On October 30 2004 22:31 IA-Taiyoushin wrote:

Show nested quote +

so are you saing that ur 490 has no useless clicks. reps?

there's no way you can play efficiently under 490 apm. but after 490 apm people are just spamming

Dave[9]

United States2365 Posts

October 30 2004 13:40 GMT

#36

130-180

there has been 10 topics of this before, may thy feel the Grim Reapers wrath.

SiS

United States753 Posts

October 30 2004 13:41 GMT

#37

Did you mean that? I hope not

Edit: I was being sarcastic, and yeah this should be closed :x

fearus

China2164 Posts

October 30 2004 13:45 GMT

#38

No, because u have a higher apm u cheat.

itzme_petey

United States1400 Posts

October 30 2004 13:46 GMT

#39

On October 30 2004 21:52 LasT[a2] wrote:
Zerg user
Highest Average: 298
Usual Average: 230+

haha he's telling the truth, freaking gosy koreans.

maleorderbride

United States2916 Posts

October 30 2004 13:56 GMT

#40

this thread is really lame. When I am really "trying" I get up to 270 APM with protoss, however, most of it is unnecessary clicking. This can get me in the mindset that i need to be in, to concentrate on the game completely, but the APM is really not a measurement of anything. it just means that I concentrated, vs my normal games of 150 APM.

This thread should be closed.