Post some funny pics

On September 21 2004 00:21 OneBlueAugust wrote:
P.S.
This would be my vote for the coolest cat ever...

On September 21 2004 03:46 Beyonder wrote:
hmm maybe some of these should not be posted^^
they classify as funny though :O

On September 21 2004 12:55 Binky1842 wrote:
My friends cat rocked this bird... which we have no idea what it is, someone know?
http://www.ice-designs.net/uploads/cat)bird.jpg

On September 21 2004 15:44 Binky1842 wrote:
Here are some more:

On September 21 2004 10:04 EnDeR_ wrote:


My personal favourite

The placard says:

We should be governed, judged and (cuiden ??) by
THE WHORES
because his sons have failed

On September 24 2004 19:53 Asta wrote:




nice but i've already seen a "harder" one but can't find it anymore. anybody got any more of those math things?

On October 12 2004 13:01 Levu wrote:


damn, i still haven't figured out that one
can somebody pls help me? T_T

On October 12 2004 13:11 jtan wrote:
Btw, whats that stuff with bush having wood? I dont get it -_-

On October 13 2004 04:24 Tudazul wrote:


translating msg: Only rest the fat one.

On October 13 2004 04:24 Tudazul wrote:


translating msg: Only rest the fat one.

On February 26 2005 14:05 ReBanned wrote:
ZOMBIES, RUNNNNNN

On October 13 2004 17:06 cav wrote:

sorry, that is not the reason.
the equation you are given is a=b. then it is a�=ab. what happened was the entire equation was multiplied by a variable, thus adding another answer (0). When you get down to the line 2a=a, 'a' must equal 0; that is the only solution that works. this comes from multiplying the entire equation by 'a' in the first place.

saying there is something wrong this this is like saying
5x=2x
5=2 OMGOMG

hope that englightened someone.

On February 26 2005 18:14 jangsh wrote:

HAHA^^

On October 13 2004 17:06 cav wrote:

sorry, that is not the reason.
the equation you are given is a=b. then it is a?=ab. what happened was the entire equation was multiplied by a variable, thus adding another answer (0). When you get down to the line 2a=a, 'a' must equal 0; that is the only solution that works. this comes from multiplying the entire equation by 'a' in the first place.

saying there is something wrong this this is like saying
5x=2x
5=2 OMGOMG

hope that englightened someone.

On February 26 2005 20:33 froZen_wYnd wrote:


ur not very bright... jtan was right, lol

On February 26 2005 20:48 Cambium wrote:
You start off with x = x,
root(x^2) = root((-x)^2)
x = -x

On February 26 2005 21:07 HnR)hT wrote:

I don't get it. The third line doesn't follow from the second line
edit: If that actually was your whole point than ignore this post.

On February 26 2005 21:14 Cambium wrote:


From second to third line:
The root sign and the square sign cancel.

On February 26 2005 18:14 jangsh wrote:

HAHA^^

On February 26 2005 21:40 HnR)hT wrote:

Since the process of squaring a real number and then taking the square root of the obtained quantity is not generally commutative, that's not a legal operation.

Also, the real function f = x^2 is not injective, and the real function g = x^.5 is not surjective, so unless I'm mistaken the composite function f(g) must be neither, which means you can never cancel things (and neither f nor g can have inverses).
I'm mostly just writing this for my own benefit though. I'm pretty annoyed, lol.

Why is it said that the rule (a^b)^c = a^(b*c) holds for all real a, b, c?

On February 26 2005 22:15 1337 wrote:
you have g2b kidding me. how is there a discusion about math happening right now? how can there actualy be an intelligent math thread? hell has frozen over. :O

On February 26 2005 22:35 HnR)hT wrote:
Oh, it took me like 10 minutes of googling "rules of exponents" to find *one* place that says the (a^b)^c = a^(b*c) rule holds only for positive bases. Many sites just say it holds whenever all numbers involved are real, which is just plain wrong . That's why I was a little worked up t.t

On February 26 2005 23:44 EchoOfRain wrote:
omg the nerd readings are off the charts....

On February 26 2005 23:59 BloodOfAChamp wrote:
LoL

On February 27 2005 02:21 Meta wrote:

it's a forum that revolves entirely around the professional field of a computer game
the idea of this entire website is nerdier than some guys talking about math, so stfu