|
On December 12 2009 06:21 Nytefish wrote:
Every single one of these threads has had the OP exaggerating and/or lying. Now until you prove otherwise with a match list people are going to assume you are the same.
Now you could easily shut everyone up by simply showing how you got bashed by much better players and some people might even give you some sympathy, but as it stands you're just another whiner.
Now the reason for all the hate gets pretty obvious.
Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide.
I got better things to do than to troll about losing to someone my own level. But if thats what is the most common thing to occur, then yeah, I can see where alot of people are coming from in this thread.
Thanks Saturnize, at least someone knows what it's like to play these 850 rating 300 APMers, with micro way better than you have ever seen after hundreds of games in D+.
|
The weekly smurf blog. Oh how exciting!
|
On December 12 2009 06:57 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 06:21 Nytefish wrote:
Every single one of these threads has had the OP exaggerating and/or lying. Now until you prove otherwise with a match list people are going to assume you are the same.
Now you could easily shut everyone up by simply showing how you got bashed by much better players and some people might even give you some sympathy, but as it stands you're just another whiner. Now the reason for all the hate gets pretty obvious. Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide. just show your match list retard. even if your opponents clear their stats we can see their match list. if all of your opponents are undefeated then we'll believe you. if not and you're losing to d- scrubs then you're a lying bastard begging for sympathy.
|
|
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
On December 12 2009 06:57 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 06:21 Nytefish wrote:
Every single one of these threads has had the OP exaggerating and/or lying. Now until you prove otherwise with a match list people are going to assume you are the same.
Now you could easily shut everyone up by simply showing how you got bashed by much better players and some people might even give you some sympathy, but as it stands you're just another whiner. Now the reason for all the hate gets pretty obvious. Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide. I got better things to do than to troll about losing to someone my own level. But if thats what is the most common thing to occur, then yeah, I can see where alot of people are coming from in this thread. Thanks Saturnize, at least someone knows what it's like to play these 850 rating 300 APMers, with micro way better than you have ever seen after hundreds of games in D+.
a player who goes 50% to C would dazzle you with his micro
|
On December 12 2009 06:57 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 06:21 Nytefish wrote:
Every single one of these threads has had the OP exaggerating and/or lying. Now until you prove otherwise with a match list people are going to assume you are the same.
Now you could easily shut everyone up by simply showing how you got bashed by much better players and some people might even give you some sympathy, but as it stands you're just another whiner. Now the reason for all the hate gets pretty obvious. Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide. I got better things to do than to troll about losing to someone my own level. But if thats what is the most common thing to occur, then yeah, I can see where alot of people are coming from in this thread. Thanks Saturnize, at least someone knows what it's like to play these 850 rating 300 APMers, with micro way better than you have ever seen after hundreds of games in D+.
Yea that reason is because you are just like every other person who whined about a few matches lost to better players, pretending like there is an epidemic of smurfs or some shit, then failing to produce any conclusive evidence. Keep mentioning 1 game that ticked you off, as if it is something that should motivate you to make a pathetic blog (even though many other people have gone through the same thing at least once, and have gotten over it or seen the benefit in it). Yea, that's the reason for all the hate. It's not about you losing to someone your own level, it's about you losing to a better person a few times and being a pussy about it.
Ohhh nooo, I played a guy who is better than me, can someone please relate?! Oh, Saturnize, you are the only one that doesn't think I'm a tool, let me latch onto you for moral support because it is so clearly unfair that I had to play against a guy with 300 apm, even though I lose to 6-8 D-level players anyway.
|
I think its funny that people are complaining that "oh you are whining because you lost to a better player" but the smurf has to make a new account to play much much worse players 
|
On December 12 2009 05:46 ghostWriter wrote:
"Actually, I always take full responsibility when I lose, I know that I can beat pretty much anyone, except for Flash (since i play T, lol). "
What is this LOL
You're probably really bad, please don't malign Flash's good name by associating it with yours. But, I'm glad you take responsibility for the important things in life.
You're just a cherry pie with extra sugar on it, aren't you.
|
On December 12 2009 07:04 fanatacist wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 06:57 Catch]22 wrote:On December 12 2009 06:21 Nytefish wrote:
Every single one of these threads has had the OP exaggerating and/or lying. Now until you prove otherwise with a match list people are going to assume you are the same.
Now you could easily shut everyone up by simply showing how you got bashed by much better players and some people might even give you some sympathy, but as it stands you're just another whiner. Now the reason for all the hate gets pretty obvious. Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide. I got better things to do than to troll about losing to someone my own level. But if thats what is the most common thing to occur, then yeah, I can see where alot of people are coming from in this thread. Thanks Saturnize, at least someone knows what it's like to play these 850 rating 300 APMers, with micro way better than you have ever seen after hundreds of games in D+. Yea that reason is because you are just like every other person who whined about a few matches lost to better players, pretending like there is an epidemic of smurfs or some shit, then failing to produce any conclusive evidence. Keep mentioning 1 game that ticked you off, as if it is something that should motivate you to make a pathetic blog (even though many other people have gone through the same thing at least once, and have gotten over it or seen the benefit in it). Yea, that's the reason for all the hate. It's not about you losing to someone your own level, it's about you losing to a better person a few times and being a pussy about it. Ohhh nooo, I played a guy who is better than me, can someone please relate?! Oh, Saturnize, you are the only one that doesn't think I'm a tool, let me latch onto you for moral support because it is so clearly unfair that I had to play against a guy with 300 apm, even though I lose to 6-8 D-level players anyway.
Yeah, I lose to D players, Its called being D level.
|
Catch]22 you are a legit low-end D+ player. therefore its unlikely that your grasp on the game is deep enough to distinguish between the higher levels of starcrafting i.e. C- or above. Smurfs, as you like to label them, are perhaps only inoffensive legit C- users and not out of reach smurfing B players. Those aforementioned C- players that you find on your path are simply there to make sure that you get bumped back to D+ instead of crossing the C- frontier, therefore their presence in your starcraft world should be seen as a blessing because it ensures that you remain in your skill range (winning or losing vs D+'s and losing vs C-'s) without risking to play C users while you're standing at C-
|
On December 12 2009 07:11 intrudor wrote:
Catch]22 you are a legit low-end D+ player. therefore its unlikely that your grasp on the game is deep enough to distinguish between the higher levels of starcrafting i.e. C- or above. Smurfs, as you like to label them, are perhaps only inoffensive legit C- users and not out of reach smurfing B players. Those aforementioned C- players that you find on your path are simply there to make sure that you get bumped back to D+ instead of crossing the C- frontier, therefore their presence in your starcraft world should be seen as a blessing because it ensures that you remain in your skill range (winning or losing vs D+'s and losing vs C-'s) without risking to play C users while you're standing at C-
GG
|
This blog makes me laugh.
On December 12 2009 05:28 Catch]22 wrote:
No, seriously, when I say confirmed smufs, I really mean confirmed smurfs, like checking previous season stats etc.
Oh really?
|
On December 12 2009 06:07 fanatacist wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 05:57 Catch]22 wrote:On December 12 2009 05:55 FyRe_DragOn wrote:
if you dont like starting at the bottom of a ladder, dont play on a ladder system. simple as that, dont bitch about it. also i agree that people who dont leave after they obviously cant come back are annoying to play against. and, what the fuck is the difference between "SMURFS" and regular players who are at a higher level than you? None to you i should expect, except that you dont know ahead of time their skill level, which shouldnt matter at all unless u decide to go easy against them, which is a bad idea because the only players you as a d+ player should be going easy on are d- players - and good players dont get d- *wooosh* Did you even read about the tankers? Do you even know what a smurf is? A smurf isn't just someone who is a better player than you, its someone who is pretending to be a new player/worse than he really is, in order to get to stomp people. But yeah, you guys are right, I should be able to view it as a learning oppourtunity, since they make fewer mistakes, I hadn't thought of it that way. And no, I dont play on the account Catch]22 at the moment. At the moment. So you did, earlier this season. So within the past few months. And you are 57-113. So hypothetically speaking there should be MORE higher ranked players playing you because it is from earlier in the season. Why would you object to it? Oh right, because it becomes painfully obvious that you are a 33% winrate D+ player who wouldn't be able to tell C from A level play.
Yes, I am D+, people staying at D+ have ~that winrate, otherwise you would go up to C.
Look, something else than me is obviously bothering you, maybe you need to handle that directly instead of taking it out on me. Either that, or you dont realize that I havnt been playign for too long, or I dont have the talent of Koll.
|
On December 12 2009 05:50 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 05:46 NEwAcC) wrote:
lol, your concept of "stallers" is backwards I think
if your opponent gains an edge, starts taking the map + getting 200/200 and you're the one who stays in the game (by turtling up off 2 base) you're the staller Now you're just arguing semantics.
No, he is right. You are the asshole for not leaving.
|
You have 0 B+/B/B- players in your match list.
Stop to whine.
|
|
|
Damn Idra, looks like he 5raxed me 
|
On December 12 2009 07:32 redtooth wrote:fucking smurfs...
Morrow is such an abuser :/
Playing D+ for points ....
|
On December 12 2009 07:32 redtooth wrote:fucking smurfs...
Idra is so goddamn cheesy lol 
|
On December 12 2009 05:28 Catch]22 wrote:
No, seriously, when I say confirmed smufs, I really mean confirmed smurfs, like checking previous season stats etc.
On December 12 2009 06:57 Catch]22 wrote:
Unfortunately, most of these "known smurfs" are from people who would log into a C+ or B- account later on, usually baited by some "yeah, no, you're not B" or w/e. So there's not really much hard evidence to provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i47.tinypic.com/2mnertx.jpg)
