EPT[OSL] Bacchus OSL 2009 Ro16 Day 5 - Page 9
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Balfazar
Australia483 Posts
| ||
|
ShloobeR
Korea (South)3809 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:51 deathgod6 wrote: Nah... it looks like he threw this one. His micro was way off. Still though, he did look disappointed with his play. I donno. :X did you expect him to flash a cheeky smile at the camera? : ) It's all for show!! my boy effort would never throw a game!! | ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:40 crucifix wrote: Now watch JD dying painfully ! k, thanks  | ||
|
darktreb
United States3016 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:51 Instigata wrote: So Jaedong might have to play a playoff and not even make it out of his group? It seems unlikely that he'd be the loser in a 3 person group of all Zergs. But JD has looked SO tired lately and Effort and Yarnc aren't ZvZs pushovers - both have beaten JD in the last month in fact. Anything is possible at this point. I don't think JD threw that game - it wouldn't have made sense to leave open the possibility of having to play a grueling tiebreaker, even if it is ZvZ, and risk not advancing. But he definitely didn't practice as hard for this as his upcoming MSL game against Kal, I'll bet that much. What would be RIDICULOUS is if Effort beats Flash (which I thought was likely even before, but is now even more likely given that the game doesn't matter to Flash but does to Effort, and that Flash's TvZ looks horrible at the moment). Because then JD plays Effort in GOM in a BO3, and they would then possibly face off again in a tiebreaker! | ||
|
Dgtl
Canada889 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:54 JWD wrote: Replay going now...try to determine whether JD even tried to micro his mutas He didn't, it looked like he just moved them around lol. | ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:49 GTR wrote: that doesnt constitute a slump at all -.-holy shit jaedong loses a zvz? slump slump slump neither does losing 3 games in a row | ||
|
Marine50
Australia1764 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:55 Balfazar wrote: So how exactly do the tiebreakers work when it's 2 to advance instead of just 1? theres about 20 posts in this thread that explain how it works | ||
|
Ota Solgryn
Denmark2011 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:54 Dgtl wrote: Time for the least hyped match of the day for me atleast. Backho vs Type-B. Not to take away from them but they aren't the best. No they arent but come on! Its backHO. He makes for the most entertaining games in progames. He always finds ways to amazing or to make you laugh or whatever. He is so much fun. | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
| ||
|
zimz
United States510 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66158 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:55 Carnac wrote: that doesnt constitute a slump at all -.- neither does losing 3 games in a row Commentators seem rather surprised though Kim Carrier: "It's shocking that JD is in a 3-game losing streak." | ||
|
Dgtl
Canada889 Posts
 | ||
|
deathgod6
United States5064 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:55 ShloobeR wrote: did you expect him to flash a cheeky smile at the camera? : ) It's all for show!! my boy effort would never throw a game!! And you're an Oz fan? Btw, if he flashed that smile at the camera I would've laughed so hard. | ||
|
DM20
Canada544 Posts
| ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:56 konadora wrote: Commentators seem rather surprised though Kim Carrier: "It's shocking that JD is in a 3-game losing streak." Is the idea that JD would throw his game too taboo for them to discuss? That seems like the most obvious explanation for this loss. | ||
|
PeAcY6969
France621 Posts
| ||
boesthius
United States11637 Posts
| ||
|
zimz
United States510 Posts
| ||
|
ShloobeR
Korea (South)3809 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:57 deathgod6 wrote: And you're an Oz fan? Btw, if he flashed that smile at the camera I would've laughed so hard. Yes | ||
|
Marine50
Australia1764 Posts
On July 08 2009 18:56 konadora wrote: Commentators seem rather surprised though Kim Carrier: "It's shocking that JD is in a 3-game losing streak." If your always up the top, when you drop a little it always seems worse then it is | ||
| ||
