EPT1) When and who we gonna play?
2) what is map order?
[R&S] Gambit's Cup Round 1 - Page 46
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
reps)Defi
Russian Federation337 Posts
1) When and who we gonna play? 2) what is map order? | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 03 2012 13:06 hacklebeast wrote: I don't have any knowledge other than what has been said in this thread. But if you are assuming that the plans changed without notification because people complained about a rule decision, you are making a bad assumption imo. yeah but he never said who is playing first , when and where :troll: | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
 | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 03 2012 19:37 reps)Plumbum wrote: When reps vs Fox and SJ vs SiR will be casted? Get me the reps, and I can get that arranged :D edit: but if you want to know results they have been spoiled many places  I can send you pm as well. | ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1074 Posts
Therefore I propose to LRM of using 5 BO1s to decide (with 1 BO1 already played), we both submit line-ups to eywa. Then carry out a lag test, if any pair lags, eywa will arrange player switching, to start the BO1s. Knowing that LRM is probably the most serious team in fighting for the $500 USD prize pool that they keep on mentioning, we would allow after LRM to switch one of their players in the end, providing it doesnt lag of course, to offset the "supposed advantage" we got from switching wk to jaystar... I know there is lots of lag but 5 BO1s should be playable, as demonstrated by jaystar vs TT. Of course both these players would not be allowed to play. Hope other teams can comment on this method too... Thanks edit: I know how reps would prefer eywa's idea, actually, I think they'd prefer double w/o so they can enter playoffs straight away | ||
|
ZaRaki_
Spain126 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 03 2012 20:12 HaFnium wrote: Seriously the whole organisation is a joke. With Eywa first announing that reps would go through with double W/O. Then turning to the method of reps vs CN/reps vs LRM but with no details announced whatsoever. Therefore I propose to LRM of using 5 BO1s to decide (with 1 BO1 already played), we both submit line-ups to eywa. Then carry out a lag test, if any pair lags, eywa will arrange player switching, to start the BO1s. Knowing that LRM is probably the most serious team in fighting for the $500 USD prize pool that they keep on mentioning, we would allow after LRM to switch one of their players in the end, providing it doesnt lag of course, to offset the "supposed advantage" we got from switching wk to jaystar... I know there is lots of lag but 5 BO1s should be playable, as demonstrated by jaystar vs TT. Of course both these players would not be allowed to play. Hope other teams can comment on this method too... Thanks Hey dude this was the best suggestion I have read so far :D. Seems fair to have this done since set 1 was already played and every other team has played vs CN. Eywa you still need to reply to your decisions, you made them rather hastily and they wasn't quite complete... Then you left things up in the air for the teams to determine when they were going to play and whom was playing? I know you are super busy doing all this lucrative stuff, but then if you have as much profit as you claim, you should just hire an assistant or something of the sort so the league can run a little more smoothly. I am all for competitive BW and keeping the activity up, but when it takes a week to get to replies, and casts from 2 weeks ago are still not casted/up-dated/whatever, it starts to reflect a little poorly. | ||
|
reps)Largo
Russian Federation192 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On October 03 2012 19:37 reps)Plumbum wrote: When reps vs Fox and SJ vs SiR will be casted? Likely not. | ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1074 Posts
On October 03 2012 21:10 reps)Largo wrote: seems it's just too much for a one man's shoulders Thatas why we are offering to help with these suggestions and discussions.... | ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1074 Posts
Edit: 5 BO1s should work with some switching, considering players like LRM)Shad, LRM)TrutaCz, LRM)Bakuryu, LRM)Coosy, LRM)Game have all succesfully played with players from China. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On October 03 2012 21:36 HaFnium wrote: As for the 5 BO1s, if there is lag, we can be flexible, say like 5 BO1s turning to 3 BO3s, or IF it raelly deosnt work (which is highyl unlikely) we can always tell TT to play a BO5/7 with Jaystar since that is almost guaranteed to be okay. Edit: 5 BO1s should work with some switching, considering players like LRM)Shad, LRM)TrutaCz, LRM)Bakuryu, LRM)Coosy, LRM)Game have all succesfully played with players from China. Even with TT vs Jaystar, I believe the term that was used was "playable". | ||
|
reps)Defi
Russian Federation337 Posts
1) final desicion 2) if #1 will not change, then tell WHEN we should play, vs WHO we should play and WHAT MAPS we should play. Thx | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
On October 03 2012 20:12 HaFnium wrote: Seriously the whole organisation is a joke. With Eywa first announing that reps would go through with double W/O. Then turning to the method of reps vs CN/reps vs LRM but with no details announced whatsoever. Therefore I propose to LRM of using 5 BO1s to decide (with 1 BO1 already played), we both submit line-ups to eywa. Then carry out a lag test, if any pair lags, eywa will arrange player switching, to start the BO1s. Knowing that LRM is probably the most serious team in fighting for the $500 USD prize pool that they keep on mentioning, we would allow after LRM to switch one of their players in the end, providing it doesnt lag of course, to offset the "supposed advantage" we got from switching wk to jaystar... I know there is lots of lag but 5 BO1s should be playable, as demonstrated by jaystar vs TT. Of course both these players would not be allowed to play. Hope other teams can comment on this method too... Thanks edit: I know how reps would prefer eywa's idea, actually, I think they'd prefer double w/o so they can enter playoffs straight away Do not try to dodge, brother communists! We should kick our common enemy - UNITED STATES together, with our shoulders tight!!! For the communism till the death!!! | ||
|
anklebreak
92 Posts
On October 03 2012 22:27 reps)Plumbum wrote: Do not try to dodge, brother communists! We should kick our common enemy - UNITED STATES together, with our shoulders tight!!! For the communism till the death!!! Maoism and Stalinist aren't compatible with each other | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 03 2012 22:11 Eywa- wrote: Even with TT vs Jaystar, I believe the term that was used was "playable". so does LRM not play CN in round 2?... You can seem to reply fast enough, not answer the important questions, then magically have prior engagements? | ||
Sayle
United Kingdom3685 Posts
| ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1074 Posts
On October 03 2012 23:18 dRaW wrote: so does LRM not play CN in round 2?... You can seem to reply fast enough, not answer the important questions, then magically have prior engagements? well what does playable mean? it literally means playable right? So that means we can play. Some other sets were like that e.g. Napo vs caicai so what makes lrm so special that they can't even play when it's only 'playable'? | ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1074 Posts
On October 03 2012 22:27 reps)Plumbum wrote: Do not try to dodge, brother communists! We should kick our common enemy - UNITED STATES together, with our shoulders tight!!! For the communism till the death!!! I thought lrm is spanish and is our distant european friend...no? if not and ur right, fuck the capitalists indeed! | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
On October 04 2012 01:20 HaFnium wrote: I thought lrm is spanish and is our distant european friend...no? if not and ur right, fuck the capitalists indeed! LRM has no players from Spain atm, actually they are already USA-team for a long time. LETS FUCK CAPITALISTS TOGETHER!!!! | ||
| ||
