EPT[MST] Group 10 - Page 17
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Rustymike
Finland327 Posts
| ||
|
whatusername
Canada1181 Posts
| ||
|
lexpoa
Brazil73 Posts
I feel so bad for BeSt... | ||
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
the "winner" logo next to Greats name like a cartoon | ||
|
jaQi
1121 Posts
On July 30 2011 17:54 Sufficiency wrote: What?! Great won? How....??? Great seems to have like 10 drones left and did not micro at all to protect his drones. Best did not have more probes as great drones either, plus great was way ahead anyways. Severaly expo's, mining bases, somehow tons of hydras coming out of nowhere... while Best was bases on his 1,5 mining bases and his little army which was controlled by the Hydras of great. | ||
|
Turbovolver
Australia2394 Posts
But why is everyone going "lol just build hydras and win". If it's not 3hatch cheese BS, then it's nothing Protoss haven't faced before. Did protoss over-tech, or have bad storms? Did zerg get up uncontested bases? I am hardly some pro PvZ analyst but I'm sick of people pretending like "lol hydras" is really the extent of what is going on. | ||
|
TheOnly92
Malaysia804 Posts
| ||
|
Evs
Philippines330 Posts
| ||
Spica
United States5582 Posts
| ||
|
gngfn
United States1726 Posts
| ||
|
Crunchums
United States11144 Posts
On July 30 2011 17:54 Crunchums wrote: this game feels like the players are actually playing some bizarre UMS zerg is not allowed to issue commands to his drones and is only allowed to make hydras and overlords protoss is only allowed to make zealots and high templars (and morph archons) | ||
|
bearbuddy
3442 Posts
| ||
|
One Page Memory
Bulgaria2145 Posts
On July 30 2011 17:57 Spica wrote: If only BeSt was at 1-2 so that he could get another chance if great somehow wins against Classic to potentially get the wildcard spot... Sigh.... what wildcard spot? | ||
|
gngfn
United States1726 Posts
The one there isn't going to be because Great is going to get dominated by Classic. | ||
|
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
On July 30 2011 17:57 Turbovolver wrote: Hydras cop a lot of hate because they are flexible, they are kind of the go-to unit for zergs against protoss. But why is everyone going "lol just build hydras and win". If it's not 3hatch cheese BS, then it's nothing Protoss haven't faced before. Did protoss over-tech, or have bad storms? Did zerg get up uncontested bases? I am hardly some pro PvZ analyst but I'm sick of people pretending like "lol hydras" is really the extent of what is going on. you saw this game and many others ? than its just lol people saying what they are seeing bro | ||
|
mnesthes
5433 Posts
| ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
| ||
|
Spica
United States5582 Posts
Well, it's assumed that if great qualifies for the MST, he cannot participate due to going off to ACE and having to go through initial military training, so there might be a wildcard spot held in his place. Take these words with a grain of salt though. | ||
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
and that Dark Templar there in my Mineral line right under my Overlord... nah he is probably a nice guy | ||
|
doubleupgradeobbies!
Australia1187 Posts
On July 30 2011 17:57 Turbovolver wrote: Hydras cop a lot of hate because they are flexible, they are kind of the go-to unit for zergs against protoss. But why is everyone going "lol just build hydras and win". If it's not 3hatch cheese BS, then it's nothing Protoss haven't faced before. Did protoss over-tech, or have bad storms? Did zerg get up uncontested bases? I am hardly some pro PvZ analyst but I'm sick of people pretending like "lol hydras" is really the extent of what is going on. I'm no pvz expert either, but TBH, it seems best did just about everything right to hold that, and still lost anyway. He had canons in time for the original (fakeish)bust, he had storm for the second bigger bust, he had zealot speed, he held the mutas pretty well. He killed soooo much of great's econ with dts and storm drops. I think the only thing he could have done better was maybe not go for that first storm drop, since that ht might have been better in his nat to defend. | ||
| ||
