EPTGambit's Cup - Page 10
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
NrG.GoD-
Australia63 Posts
| ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On August 14 2011 22:13 NrG.GoD- wrote: this looks fun!!! is it too late to play in it!? yup very late ..... | ||
|
Sneazel
Poland152 Posts
not to late he just need to join to playing in gambit cup team | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On August 14 2011 22:13 NrG.GoD- wrote: this looks fun!!! is it too late to play in it!? I was talking to you about this but your timezone is bad for this event, you will be 4-5am every week  this is why SL] dropped out of the league. | ||
|
NrG.GoD-
Australia63 Posts
p.s i don't really want the money, it just looks fun and opportunity to play games, nowadays it's so hard to find games T.T | ||
|
JoeKim
United States608 Posts
On August 14 2011 23:15 NrG.GoD- wrote: any team wanna let me in?! ill be practice partner if i can't make it T.T p.s i don't really want the money, it just looks fun and opportunity to play games, nowadays it's so hard to find games T.T vTv, if you're interested. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On August 14 2011 23:10 dRaW wrote: I was talking to you about this but your timezone is bad for this event, you will be 4-5am every week this is why SL] dropped out of the league.This is false as far as SL] goes. | ||
ImbaTosS
United Kingdom1689 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On August 15 2011 10:08 ImbaTosS wrote: I have to ask- there will be another one, right? AoV is only just getting properly strong... I will be making a second GC for sure, I will be running it, though I hope I can get it sponsored! ^^ | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On August 15 2011 10:20 Eywa- wrote: I will be making a second GC for sure, I will be running it, though I hope I can get it sponsored! ^^ Half-chub achieved. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
Boxer(OD)
United States28 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
andreyyisbestandrey
154 Posts
Thus far LRM played 5 matches, sasnb played 5, Gt played 4, AOV played 4, and vTv played 3. Will every team end up playing the same amount of matches before the round is over, or will the points be adjusted to compensate for the fact that not all teams played the same amount of matches? I understand the difficulties perhaps raised by teams dropping out, but this issue should be addressed. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On August 15 2011 14:35 andreyyisbestandrey wrote: Hey, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I have observed that not all teams played an equal amount of matches. The teams that played more matches at the end of the round or season have an unaddressed advantage. Thus far LRM played 5 matches, sasnb played 5, Gt played 4, AOV played 4, and vTv played 3. Will every team end up playing the same amount of matches before the round is over, or will the points be adjusted to compensate for the fact that not all teams played the same amount of matches? I understand the difficulties perhaps raised by teams dropping out, but this issue should be addressed. You're wrong. The matches, as previously stated by Eywa-, of any team vs iFU or SL do not count. If you re-count the matches without any results of any teams against iFU or SL, each team will have played 4 CWs each. Here is the breakdown in tally form: + Show Spoiler [With DQ'd Teams] + LRM 1 1 1 1 1 sasnb 1 1 1 1 1 Gt 1 1 1 1 1 AoV 1 1 1 1 vTv 1 1 1 1 iFU 1 SL 1 1 + Show Spoiler [Without DQ'd Teams] + LRM: 1 1 1 1 sasnb: 1 1 1 1 Gt: 1 1 1 1 AoV: 1 1 1 1 vTv: 1 1 1 1 In order: LRM > AoV LRM > vTv LRM < sasnb LRM > Gt sasnb > LRM sasnb > Gt sasnb > AoV sasnb > vTv Gt > AoV (W.O +3 - something I don't agree with) Gt < sasnb Gt < LRM Gt <> vTv AoV < LRM AoV < Gt AoV < vTv AoV < sasnb vTv < LRM vTv > AoV vTv < sasnb vTV <> Gt I will edit this post in a few minutes with the copy/paste of every single CW by each team that has counted. Also, you would do yourself well by counting the points based on these CWs before making your assumption about an imbalance. Edit: Check spoiler #2 | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On August 15 2011 15:01 Eywa- wrote: My appologies, fixed the points for sasnb and LRM.(though it doesn't change much tbh) While I agree that LRM) + sas should get points for having to deal with SL and that they played on more than one occasions, it's pointless to drag out the entire league for the other 3 teams to play 1 CW a piece (odd number doesn't work anyway) just to match non-game changing points. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
soujiro_
Uruguay5195 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
Thanks. Edit: NVM | ||
| ||
