What was up with the token HT? Was it just me, or did Bisu only use the 1?

Bisu's aggressive base expoing in the middle of that game was ultimately the key to his victory for me. He certainly prefers that style in his PvT, though sometimes he gets a little too carried away and forgets to keep a sizeable army.

Random_0

United States1163 Posts

February 26 2011 05:54 GMT

#691

I assume it will be Kal. Fitting that this should decide the match.

blahman3344

United States2015 Posts

February 26 2011 05:54 GMT

#692

Oh man, that was a bit of a tense game, I almost thought Bisu lost it at several points. Aside from that, I felt that Bisu's attacks were kinda sloppy (there were several points when his zealots got caught behind a line of goons, and couldn't move to the tanks until too many goons were lost).

JSH

United States4109 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#693

On February 26 2011 14:53 ghrur wrote:
Carriers would've helped a lot imo. :/

Not Bisu's carriers

haha but in all honesty he said he is good with it and I don't doubt him, but in televised games he seems to lose

POWEROUTAGE

Singapore884 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#694

watching bisu's pvt is like watching someone open a door by smashing his head against said door repeatedly instead of turning the damn knob

mnesthes

5433 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#695

That looked awfully like a lot of TvP I've seen recently. T allows P to take a gazillion bases, then after holding off P's attacks, decides to push out (when it's already too late) and dies to infinite units.

and what's with the guys saying that there were points in the game where Bisu could lose? He basically got it in the bag the moment he took the whole map when Frozen decided to stick his head inside his shell. Frozen never even managed to destroy a nexus in that game.

Random_0

United States1163 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#696

never mind.

xxpack09

United States2160 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#697

On February 26 2011 14:54 cascades wrote:
Bisu didn't mix in enough templars. Even carriers harassing 4th would be great. But well, Bisu and Carriers lol.

Bisu would find a way to get 10 carriers and lose them all. He's just kind of bad with them inexplicably

cascades

Singapore6122 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#698

On February 26 2011 14:54 gostunv wrote:
CA's army control severely lacking in that game...

how many times did he have 4+ tanks not sieged....

Sometimes, he was Trying to do a Flash and spread out tank lines.

insanet

Peru439 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#699

lol, cmon, this match was fun, but bisu pvt is like riding a bicycle with square tires, it just feels weird.
is not so beatiful as his PvZ

MoonBear

Straight outta Johto18973 Posts

February 26 2011 05:55 GMT

#700

On February 26 2011 14:53 mOojc wrote:
Bisu's PvT is soooo messy. Even with such a massive lead, he was making enough mistakes that he could have potentially lost that.

Well, it was 6 mining bases Protoss to 2 mining bases terran. Bisu could just starve CA to death. If CA moved out to claim another base, Bisu to take advantage of the poorer positioning and drown CA's army under a tide of units. If CA didn't move, eventually he'd starve out.