EPTthat was vs junitoss iirc, the game that broke junitoss' head.
[News] KeSPA changes 'ppp' rule - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
GTR
51447 Posts
that was vs junitoss iirc, the game that broke junitoss' head. | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9103 Posts
| ||
|
AlwaysGG
Taiwan952 Posts
| ||
|
Sanity.
United States704 Posts
| ||
|
Shizuru~
Malaysia1676 Posts
they still owe an apology to leta and sparkyz though. | ||
|
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
If kespa cared about entertaining the fans they'd allow full chat in games again. Would be so nice for those longs tvts  ANd wouldnt it be fun to have players taunting the others in the opening minutes with stuff like "I 4 pool this game ok, you 14 cc please?" Much better than watching drones mine. And ya, stuff like that junitoss game is freaking awesome. Why would they want to get read of that? It doesn't inherently give a player an advantage or disadvantage, it adds another psychological layer to the game and as long as nothing publicly offensive is said(easy to regulate) then there's absolutely no harm in doing so. I think kespa needs a good lesson in sports promotion=/ | ||
|
anderoo
Canada1876 Posts
| ||
|
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
On May 09 2009 09:08 Jonoman92 wrote: Yea seriously... there is no reason to not allow chat. If a player doesn't want to he could not respond and /squelch his opponent during the first minute. I'm pretty sure you can't /squelch(99.9%) on lan setting. besides during the game /squelch doing even work...even on battle.net or iccup I mean you can do /squelch but the chat will still show..until you get back to the channel. Although I obviously fully agree with you  | ||
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
| ||
|
malathion
United States361 Posts
But just as clear is that these draconian rules are excessive. The referee should decide whether a players' conduct is unsportsmanlike or not. | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On May 09 2009 10:07 VIB wrote: What happens is someone types "rofl youre so bad" before leaving? bonus points | ||
|
SnowFantasy
4173 Posts
| ||
|
Piste
6177 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
It's not like it's a complicated issue to solve at all either... The person who leaves first lost. Saying gg is just etiquette. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
On May 09 2009 10:34 Piste wrote: what if it's a bad game? why should anyone lie that's its good game(gg). For the sake of the viewing audience, they must never know the players thought the game was bad :O | ||
|
The Storyteller
Singapore2486 Posts
| ||
|
SlayerS_`HackeR`
United States190 Posts
On May 09 2009 12:35 The Storyteller wrote: KESPA still doesn't get it. They've changed one rule but they haven't changed the underlying logic - that things that do not impact the outcome of the game should not result in disqualification. I really don't see how it really matters. Say the loser types out with "zizi yO" He loses the game, but now he gets disqualified. What is the real difference? | ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
| ||
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
| ||
|
Ellis
247 Posts
On May 09 2009 12:42 thunk wrote: I want them to reverse the ceremony rule. I think that'd be cool. You mean like they require an over the top obnoxious ceremony? There should definitely be some sort of starleague with ceremonies, bm, and chatting all encouraged. | ||
| ||
