EPTLive Proleague Finals Commentary - Page 11
| Forum Index > BW General |
pachi
Melbourne5338 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36379 Posts
| ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
|
Moletrap
United States1297 Posts
Anyway, I have the first game up already, and I'll be doing the rest this week when I find the time.. Game 1: Part 1, Part 2 I guess I could come back and edit this post or make new replies, but it'd probably be easier for people to just keep an eye on the VioleTAK youtube account since I'll be uploading them there. (youtube.com/VioleTAK) | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
GTR
51486 Posts
 | ||
zatic
Zurich15352 Posts
The comments on Yt are already hilarious :-) | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36379 Posts
listening to myself talk i found a ton of errors and ways to improve. i need to smooth out my delivery and think a bit more ahead of what i am saying. also, i had a ton more stuff to say but never did because i didn't plan out how to say stuff very well. still, it was our first time so hopefully we'll have opportunities to do better. | ||
|
Moletrap
United States1297 Posts
Game 2 is up. | ||
Chill
Calgary25986 Posts
We consciously made the decision not to feign excitement but I think we took it WAY too far. I listened to it and we sound bored and boring for most of it. I think sometimes english casters sound fake in their excitement and that's why we decided to avoid that. But I think we really need to do the opposite and make a conscious decision to be excited or else you get monotone casting for three and a half hours. And we're not the most excitable people either. I expect Youtube to hate us since we sound WAY more amateurish than Moletrap/Diggity/Klazart, and we are boring to listen to and don't even call the play haha :X. I think the back-and-forth between Hot_Bid and myself was a little too formulaic. If we had three people it would probably be better. Moletrap/Diggity, how did you guys decide who was going to talk when you did it? I was thinking of having the Vent chat open and whoever has something to say types 'next' or something. The problem with this is if no one types next, then who talks? Also the fact that we weren't really reading the chat. If we can solve this problem it might be interesting to just have a ton of commentators and have at 'er. Hmm on second thought that might be a disaster lol. As for the in between games, Hot_Bid mentioned we should prepare stuff for that but I said I didn't even want to cast in between because I had nothing to say. I think Hot_Bid had random notes but other than that we just went in cold. I think we should have got more people just in the Vent so we could round-table reactions more. Kennigit helped a lot in that regards. What do people think of the banter in between games? Would you prefer it to move more towards professionalism, setting up the next game, reviewing the past game, etc? Or move away, trash talking each other, talking about random shit, etc? I think the actual meat of the commentary was good, despite the fact that I missed A LOT of stuff. after rewatching it. Somehow I didn't see that Evolution Chamber in the Kwanro game even though I was watching the game super closely. Obviously this commentary isn't going to appeal to the casual audience because the excitement levels are extremely low. I don't really care about that, but I feel like TL members would benefit from a little more excitement. I also blame the games, as there were 4 rapes, 1 decent 2v2, and a really nice game  I dunno, I'm just putting my thoughts down here so people can hopefully use them to add their own suggestions. Thanks a lot Moletrap for taking the time to sync that, much appreciated. | ||
|
GTR
51486 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25986 Posts
ahaha so good how can you even rebut that? lolol | ||
|
GTR
51486 Posts
On January 28 2008 23:12 Chill wrote: "This is a commentary, not a sermon, nerds. Do whatever you wanna do, just don't do it on this account. Kthnxbye" ahaha so good how can you even rebut that? lolol man that kid is tough ;o | ||
|
YinYang69
United States255 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25986 Posts
Basically I can sum up saying that the style of commentating I tried was a result of trying to fix errors I see others make, but we clearly took it too far in one direction. Hopefully we get a second chance to try again :D | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36379 Posts
On January 28 2008 23:21 YinYang69 wrote: Why don't you guys get someone else to do play by play? A guy like Klaz can basically spice up your commentaries ten fold. because people are watching the stream, and they don't need to be read what is happening. they can see that with their own eyes. if you have someone there calling the play just to "spice things up" then theres not enough time for actual analysis. i found after rewatching that there was a ton of stuff i missed and didn't say, and we barely had any dead time during the matches. | ||
|
GTR
51486 Posts
On January 28 2008 23:21 YinYang69 wrote: Why don't you guys get someone else to do play by play? A guy like Klaz can basically spice up your commentaries ten fold. because we're mostly looking to focus more on strategy (because the action is right on your screen) plus klazart has shown that his attitude stinks (http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?currentpage=1&topic_id=65577) edit: lol hot_bid | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25986 Posts
On January 28 2008 23:21 YinYang69 wrote: Why don't you guys get someone else to do play by play? A guy like Klaz can basically spice up your commentaries ten fold. Something to look into... either changing ourselves or adding a third. I think we're afraid of the commentary being dominated by emotional play-by-play. We don't want people being read to them what's happening on the screen, but we took it too far not even mentioning when good moves were happening. Either way something needs to change. | ||
|
YinYang69
United States255 Posts
| ||
| ||
