|
WARNING: Contains Spoilers for ASL 22 |
On August 12 2026 01:21 TMNT wrote:Hasnt changed much since last week it seems The video in which JD and SK whined about Protoss-favored map pool has aged like milk.
nice, an update on the stats
|
to be fair to soulkey and jaedong though, they were complaining about the earlier versions of the maps... back when odyssey had 10 minerals in the stack, no hallucinated minerals to block proxies in the middle or even gas-steals, and lots of buildable terrain in the middle suitable for fastest map style proxy 3-gate
first iteration of backrooms was absolute dogshit for zergs in ZvT also... it still is but first version was way worse
|
On August 12 2026 01:46 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2026 01:21 TMNT wrote:Hasnt changed much since last week it seems The video in which JD and SK whined about Protoss-favored map pool has aged like milk. I don't even get why they were complaining about that when Terrans still dominate statistically.
terran domination should be AT LEAST 60% winrate on all maps/MUs!! its their birthright
|
On August 12 2026 01:21 TMNT wrote:Hasnt changed much since last week it seems The video in which JD and SK whined about Protoss-favored map pool has aged like milk. What pool of players was used for those stats ? Seems insanely Terran favored.
|
United States10569 Posts
On August 12 2026 02:59 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2026 01:21 TMNT wrote:Hasnt changed much since last week it seems The video in which JD and SK whined about Protoss-favored map pool has aged like milk. What pool of players was used for those stats ? Seems insanely Terran favored. It's likely just eloboard stats pulled and inserted into excel to make it look pretty
|
I've got my money on another zerg win
|
Yeah it’ll be Zerg. Hoping for mini and snow to make those stats looks silly or some amazing Rush TvZ
|
Aiolos balanced around whoever gets the dog water left spawn losing
|
On August 12 2026 01:21 TMNT wrote:Hasnt changed much since last week it seems The video in which JD and SK whined about Protoss-favored map pool has aged like milk.
My prediction was correct. Terrible pool for protoss. Seen some PvT's and it just looked so inefficient to trade or engage anywhere for protoss on most of the maps.
Bring back Apocalypse, Neo Dark origin, and Dominator!
|
On August 12 2026 06:09 A.Alm wrote: I've got my money on another zerg win Soma and Soulkey look absolutely invincible in a ZvT bo5. I don’t see Light or Rush taking either of them out.
Terran race really feels really orphan with Flash departure.
|
|
|
On August 13 2026 02:15 c3rberUs wrote:I haven't seen the numbers but surely there is an outlier or two dragging the percentages up (  Soma,  Soulkey) and/or down (protoss seem to be dogwater regardless of the map pool). A good player obviously improves his race's win rates, and vice versa. But I think the so-called outliers usually don't change those numbers significantly - certainly not as much as people think.
Some examples on Attitude (the best map for Zerg and worst for Protoss, among the 3 old maps which have large number of games):
- Shuttle is probably accused of dampering his race's win rates the most, and his win rates usually look abysmal because the guy, despite not on major proleague level, plays there a lot more than he should. But he's only "able to" decrease the Protoss win rate on both matchups by less than 1% - because of his low volume of games.
- Soulkey is another low activity player, hence despite him having a ZvT win rate ~10% higher than the average of his race, is only able to raise the overall ZvT win rate by 0.7%. Also his ZvP win rate on Attitude apparently is not better than the average of Zerg.
- The only time a player raises his race's win rate by more than 1% in these examples is Soma in ZvT, but even so I wouldn't say going from 47.9 to 50.1% is that significant. This is because he has an absurd amount of ZvT games on this map (93) - which seems to be the result of some grudge matches or something with Rush (they played 43 games with each other, of which Soma won 67%). On the other hand, it's surprising that Soma actually drags the ZvP win rate down by 0.7%.
|
Japan11827 Posts
On August 13 2026 09:16 TMNT wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2026 02:15 c3rberUs wrote:I haven't seen the numbers but surely there is an outlier or two dragging the percentages up (  Soma,  Soulkey) and/or down (protoss seem to be dogwater regardless of the map pool). A good player obviously improves his race's win rates, and vice versa. But I think the so-called outliers usually don't change those numbers significantly - certainly not as much as people think. Some examples on Attitude (the best map for Zerg and worst for Protoss, among the 3 old maps which have large number of games): - Shuttle is probably accused of dampering his race's win rates the most, and his win rates usually look abysmal because the guy, despite not on major proleague level, plays there a lot more than he should. But he's only "able to" decrease the Protoss win rate on both matchups by less than 1% - because of his low volume of games. - Soulkey is another low activity player, hence despite him having a ZvT win rate ~10% higher than the average of his race, is only able to raise the overall ZvT win rate by 0.7%. Also his ZvP win rate on Attitude apparently is not better than the average of Zerg. - The only time a player raises his race's win rate by more than 1% in these examples is Soma in ZvT, but even so I wouldn't say going from 47.9 to 50.1% is that significant. This is because he has an absurd amount of ZvT games on this map (93) - which seems to be the result of some grudge matches or something with Rush (they played 43 games with each other, of which Soma won 67%). On the other hand, it's surprising that Soma actually drags the ZvP win rate down by 0.7%. I shot my shot even though I know an outlier needs to have impossible winrates to really make a dent.
|
What are people’s senses of how long it takes for players to fully suss out a new map? We’re still discovering the Meta?
Secondarily, why was there so much hype about the map pool being Protoss favored before by both pros, artosis and seemingly consensus here but now the raw numbers are a little wild. Shuttle seems vindicated.
|
On August 14 2026 01:39 Sabu113 wrote: What are people’s senses of how long it takes for players to fully suss out a new map? We’re still discovering the Meta?
Secondarily, why was there so much hype about the map pool being Protoss favored before by both pros, artosis and seemingly consensus here but now the raw numbers are a little wild. Shuttle seems vindicated. It's not like that in the Korean scene.
The hype about a Protoss map pool in the foreign community, if there was ever any, was largely influenced by the two jinjin videos, one of which Snow admitted Odyssey is a good P map, the other having JD and SK complaining about Jane Doe, Match Point and Odyssey.
First I feel like there's a lack of critical and comprehensive thinking from both the players in the videos and the viewers. Even if Odyssey were indeed heavily Protoss favored, so that's like 1 out of 7, not the majority of the pool. There are also several wrong things in that second video as well, which I will point out later.
Second, those opnions were formed when the first version of the map came out. Since then it's been nerfed as the Zergs wished, to the point now that it's become slightly disadvantageous to Protoss.
Third, Artosis knows fuck all about the Korean scene. He just regurgitates whatever jinjin feeds him. Dude had lived in Korea for 15 years but can't speak the language (he has to pay for translated guides). But more importantly, he has no interest in finding information directly from Korean websites and streams (hence his only source of information from KR is from jinjin). He had no idea about daily proleagues, SC universities, eloboard (or maybe he had but didn't bother to check) let alone fmkorea or ygosu. It's kind of insane how a leading figure of foreign BW community is that ignorant about Korean BW.
|
LB is up !! Don't forget to VOTE !
|
which seems to be the result of some grudge matches or something with Rush (they played 43 games with each other, of which Soma won 67%) And as I said this, it's 5am now and they're playing with a score of 11-9 to Rush. These two seem to single-handedly increase significantly the sample size for ZvT
|
On August 14 2026 02:57 TMNT wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2026 01:39 Sabu113 wrote: What are people’s senses of how long it takes for players to fully suss out a new map? We’re still discovering the Meta?
Secondarily, why was there so much hype about the map pool being Protoss favored before by both pros, artosis and seemingly consensus here but now the raw numbers are a little wild. Shuttle seems vindicated. It's not like that in the Korean scene. The hype about a Protoss map pool in the foreign community, if there was ever any, was largely influenced by the two jinjin videos, one of which Snow admitted Odyssey is a good P map, the other having JD and SK complaining about Jane Doe, Match Point and Odyssey. First I feel like there's a lack of critical and comprehensive thinking from both the players in the videos and the viewers. Even if Odyssey were indeed heavily Protoss favored, so that's like 1 out of 7, not the majority of the pool. There are also several wrong things in that second video as well, which I will point out later. Second, those opnions were formed when the first version of the map came out. Since then it's been nerfed as the Zergs wished, to the point now that it's become slightly disadvantageous to Protoss. Third, Artosis knows fuck all about the Korean scene. He just regurgitates whatever jinjin feeds him. Dude had lived in Korea for 15 years but can't speak the language (he has to pay for translated guides). But more importantly, he has no interest in finding information directly from Korean websites and streams (hence his only source of information from KR is from jinjin). He had no idea about daily proleagues, SC universities, eloboard (or maybe he had but didn't bother to check) let alone fmkorea or ygosu. It's kind of insane how a leading figure of foreign BW community is that ignorant about Korean BW. Thank You
|
On August 14 2026 02:57 TMNT wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2026 01:39 Sabu113 wrote: What are people’s senses of how long it takes for players to fully suss out a new map? We’re still discovering the Meta?
Secondarily, why was there so much hype about the map pool being Protoss favored before by both pros, artosis and seemingly consensus here but now the raw numbers are a little wild. Shuttle seems vindicated. It's not like that in the Korean scene. The hype about a Protoss map pool in the foreign community, if there was ever any, was largely influenced by the two jinjin videos, one of which Snow admitted Odyssey is a good P map, the other having JD and SK complaining about Jane Doe, Match Point and Odyssey. First I feel like there's a lack of critical and comprehensive thinking from both the players in the videos and the viewers. Even if Odyssey were indeed heavily Protoss favored, so that's like 1 out of 7, not the majority of the pool. There are also several wrong things in that second video as well, which I will point out later. Second, those opnions were formed when the first version of the map came out. Since then it's been nerfed as the Zergs wished, to the point now that it's become slightly disadvantageous to Protoss. Third, Artosis knows fuck all about the Korean scene. He just regurgitates whatever jinjin feeds him. Dude had lived in Korea for 15 years but can't speak the language (he has to pay for translated guides). But more importantly, he has no interest in finding information directly from Korean websites and streams (hence his only source of information from KR is from jinjin). He had no idea about daily proleagues, SC universities, eloboard (or maybe he had but didn't bother to check) let alone fmkorea or ygosu. It's kind of insane how a leading figure of foreign BW community is that ignorant about Korean BW.
+1
very well put
|
On August 13 2026 19:37 c3rberUs wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2026 09:16 TMNT wrote:On August 13 2026 02:15 c3rberUs wrote:I haven't seen the numbers but surely there is an outlier or two dragging the percentages up (  Soma,  Soulkey) and/or down (protoss seem to be dogwater regardless of the map pool). A good player obviously improves his race's win rates, and vice versa. But I think the so-called outliers usually don't change those numbers significantly - certainly not as much as people think. Some examples on Attitude (the best map for Zerg and worst for Protoss, among the 3 old maps which have large number of games): - Shuttle is probably accused of dampering his race's win rates the most, and his win rates usually look abysmal because the guy, despite not on major proleague level, plays there a lot more than he should. But he's only "able to" decrease the Protoss win rate on both matchups by less than 1% - because of his low volume of games. - Soulkey is another low activity player, hence despite him having a ZvT win rate ~10% higher than the average of his race, is only able to raise the overall ZvT win rate by 0.7%. Also his ZvP win rate on Attitude apparently is not better than the average of Zerg. - The only time a player raises his race's win rate by more than 1% in these examples is Soma in ZvT, but even so I wouldn't say going from 47.9 to 50.1% is that significant. This is because he has an absurd amount of ZvT games on this map (93) - which seems to be the result of some grudge matches or something with Rush (they played 43 games with each other, of which Soma won 67%). On the other hand, it's surprising that Soma actually drags the ZvP win rate down by 0.7%. I shot my shot even though I know an outlier needs to have impossible winrates to really make a dent. After 20+ games with Rush yesterday, looks like Soma is doing the same with Speed today, and he's leading 9-2 at the moment. If he continues to grind games with Terrans like this, and if he smashes them with this kind of score, he can actually make a dent.
|
|
|
|
|
|