BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ - Page 211

On September 12 2026 22:21 vfsjhvfsjh wrote:
Of course you don't have to prove anything. We already know you're basically a C-rank player.

You're missing my point. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being C rank. The problem is acting like some kind of commander in SABC games, constantly bossing people around and blaming teammates as if you're far above everyone else.

If you really want to play general and tell everyone how to play, you've already got the perfect playground for that — CDE.

So relax, General. Go command your troops over there. ^__^

On September 12 2026 04:36 vfsjhvfsjh wrote:
Hi Admin,

The main question is how match-fixing will be identified and proven, and what exactly would result in a ban. That's really all we need to know.

On September 13 2026 07:07 D3AD-R3TARD wrote:


Match-fixing means joining a game with the intention of manipulating the result—not playing to win. One obvious example is a player queueing into the same lobby on two separate accounts.

While it’s hard to catch every case, obvious match-fixing will lead to a ban.

Right now, I can't force players into different lobbies, which makes multi-accounting hard to block completely. I haven't found a fix for this.

One possible solution is to register players and make games only for registered players. By registering I mean whitelisting some nicks and making sure that no person has more then 1 whitelisted nick. Problem with this is that requires manual confirmation of players. Although for best 20 - 30 players probobly can be done...

On September 13 2026 08:15 vfsjhvfsjh wrote:


This is exactly what I was hoping for. One player, one registered nickname, with games limited to whitelisted players. I think this could solve a lot of the current problems, so let's start with this approach and see how it goes.

I also think we need some level of community involvement in managing this. Even with a whitelist system, some people may still find ways around it by using different accounts and nicknames to come back and troll. This is where input from the most active BGHMMR players could be useful. Since they play regularly, they usually know who is who and can often recognize the same player even when they return under a different account or nickname. So, as a backup to the whitelist system, I think we should also consider using community polls or votes among active BGHMMR players to identify and ban obvious or repeat trolls.

The whitelist could be the main system, with community input and polls as a backup to deal with people who try to get around it.

Lastly, as mentioned earlier, the current 3-warning system for laggers isn't working properly either. Most bots still allow the game to start even after a player has received 3 warnings. I think this system needs to be fixed and enforced more strictly. If someone reaches 3 lag warnings, there should be a clear consequence instead of simply allowing them to continue playing as usual. This would help improve the overall quality of the games.