Testie vs kOOlam Showmatch - Page 4
Forum Index > BW General |
rel
Guam3521 Posts
| ||
mel_ee
2447 Posts
| ||
Surado-
Korea (South)64 Posts
^ ^ I don't care who wins, I want some GG replays :D | ||
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
| ||
BaboToss
United States108 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
![]() | ||
BalloonFight
United States2007 Posts
| ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On January 15 2007 14:57 BalloonFight wrote: Anyone know what execs the koolam vs nada games were played on? 1.11 I think | ||
dancefayedance!~
396 Posts
| ||
Surado-
Korea (South)64 Posts
On January 15 2007 15:07 dancefayedance!~ wrote: anyone know where I can find some koolam reps? You can find some at BGHers.com | ||
Gandalf
Pakistan1905 Posts
On January 15 2007 14:10 BaboToss wrote: kOOlam and myself played PGT 2on2 and 1on1. We were like 30-3 in 2on2 and both of us were B+ and B in the 1on1. Thats not a hard thng to do if you play serious. Babo, you're becoming like me now!!! pwnz0red to da maX!! | ||
Gandalf
Pakistan1905 Posts
On January 15 2007 14:34 Sacajawea wrote: K00lam is actually one of my new favorite players, just from watching his replays. Hey, just to make sure you dont make the same mistake as some other people have: kOOlam = real k00lam = fake | ||
CoralReefer
Canada2069 Posts
On January 15 2007 14:47 Dendra wrote: dunno someone mentioned testie talkin bout koolam like he is better than most of guys in top30 database or could be better-think it's just a way to draw more publicity to the whole thing. it's like crocop vs some chobo american with score 8-0. media tries to make the poor american guy look like a worthy oponent while the fact is he's gonna get stomped by croatian beast. testie is going random on bgh if he gets Z or T he will probably lose luck will be on his side since it's all 8 positions though | ||
Loveletter
United States543 Posts
| ||
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
On January 15 2007 18:00 Loveletter wrote: hmm i guess this is rather interesting there are some insanely good BGH players. but i think people who play non money are faster and have better idea of the game in general. but thats just me i used to play alot of BGH as well just obsing some bghers today some of the better ones, they averaged 250 apm, their macro was excellent (these weren't the insanely good ones btw) they didn't suicide units into the army and preserved units as best as the could etc. bgh is different from low money but most of the concepts still apply o.o.. | ||
BaboToss
United States108 Posts
| ||
BaboToss
United States108 Posts
![]() | ||
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
![]() T_T_T_T What time did we schedule it for babotoss? | ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
On January 15 2007 18:30 BaboToss wrote: Yep, sometimes I'm asking myself why all the people argue so much about low and BGH. I mean it's just a different gaming style, but it's the same game, same units ect. We as SC players should hold together and not flame each other. true that *hugs* :D | ||
Sun
United States551 Posts
| ||
| ||