EPTOr is it just because terran pros are more skilled?
Fun statistics galore :O - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
Or is it just because terran pros are more skilled? | ||
|
ilnp
Iceland1330 Posts
55-44%... +P whiners stfu  | ||
|
fw
Korea (South)1201 Posts
http://www.pgr21.com/zboard4/view.php?id=newvod&no=1021 1. LT (total 93) T 48-30-18 (62.5) Z 37-20-17 (54.1) P 41-13-28 (31.7) T VS Z 12(54.5) VS 10(45.5) Z VS P 10(66.7) VS 5(33.3) P VS T 8(30.8) VS 18(69.2) TvT - 6 ZvZ - 21 PvP - 3 (go to end of the post and find the map name. just see the numbers. formats and orders are the same as above) 2. Bifrost (116) 3. Plain To Hill (110) 4. Emperor of Emperor (26) | ||
|
Shockey
United States2615 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
On May 17 2003 02:16 asdfers wrote: Boxer would rule perhaps... cuz toss is more micro dominant...but yellow...I doubt he'd be as good as he is now... Especially since Zerg is macro dominant. Yeah, but as Z goes... Yellow has shitty macro and awesome micro. | ||
|
Napoleic
Canada356 Posts
| ||
|
LumberJack
United States3355 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28784 Posts
..................... and napoleic according to those stats, terran has a larger edge over toss than zerg does.:O | ||
|
Ready2[ESC]
Hungary1436 Posts
 | ||
|
animal
South Africa168 Posts
| ||
|
Konni
Germany3044 Posts
Even worse on LT: PvT 8-18 and PvZ 5-10 so maybe it's not all about imbalance but about how many people play T,Z and P on a certain level of skill | ||
|
Born)Slippy
Norway1904 Posts
| ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
| ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
| ||
|
ObtuseLogic
United States72 Posts
| ||
|
ObtuseLogic
United States72 Posts
| ||
|
HnR)hT
United States3468 Posts
On May 17 2003 10:23 Liquid`Drone wrote: and napoleic according to those stats, terran has a larger edge over toss than zerg does.:O not really, they just seem to show that pvz and pvt is imbalanced, the difference between pvz and pvt %s is no doubt statistically insignificant | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
56-44 eh, lets say we played and you won 14 i won 11. That is statistically insignificant because of the very small populatin size. Then lets say we play 100 games, you win 56 i win 44. Ok, thats still kinda small, but you won a lot more. Now lets say we play 300 games. You win what 168 i win 132. Thats a 35 game differential. Boxer wins 62.5% of his games according to this post, and 56% is halfway between that and equal. I consider boxer a top 3 progamer, so halfway between winning half and boxer is pretty damn good no? :/ Adding to this that pvt is more imbalanced statistically than pvz, its hardly insignificant. However, in my opinion, the majority of the imbalance comes from the maps. If you think about pvz, island maps p owns, and land maps z owns. That really shows a big difference in imbalance. Let say for pvz, p wins 70% on islands? Is that a fair thing to say? Now, if p is winning this high of a percentage of games on islands, how bad must they be on other maps if they are only winning 44% of total games? I dunno, who cares, bw is most balanced game ive ever seen, more balanced than chess, white/black :o | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
| ||
|
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
| ||
| ||
