EPTNew Real APM evaluating program bwRepInfo - Page 6
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
| ||
|
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
| ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
 . | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
On October 29 2010 16:58 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I think the updated BW chart does do eAPM? I remember being able to see mine somewhere. If this is the case, I'm not aware of it. The problem with Eapm is that often things done too close together or too frequently are disregarded when they're actually micro (lots of fast actions in small area). I mean... just to give you an idea, according to this old algorithm, Jaedong/FlaSh/Leta/Free/St0rk/Bisu (those are just the reps I tested) are all about 40-45% spam in their games. I think this to be highly unlikely. | ||
|
meathook
1289 Posts
| ||
|
Armathai
1023 Posts
Also Flash vs JD comes out like 20-30% redundancy, but given I'd say the program has a 10% error margin they're fine? | ||
|
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
On October 29 2010 19:16 Diminotoor wrote: If this is the case, I'm not aware of it. The problem with Eapm is that often things done too close together or too frequently are disregarded when they're actually micro (lots of fast actions in small area). I mean... just to give you an idea, according to this old algorithm, Jaedong/FlaSh/Leta/Free/St0rk/Bisu (those are just the reps I tested) are all about 40-45% spam in their games. I think this to be highly unlikely. what replay did u watch? Oo i cant remember any rep of flash or bisu where they were spamming. Then again, i didnt have many reps of them. t.t But they used to have like 25% redundancy which is really low. But Jaedong is a spammer, no doubt about it. Like Nada and probably Julyzerg too, these 400 APM dont mean he is playing with 300 EAPM. Afair all 3 of them had pretty much the same EAPM as everyone else at that time | ||
|
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
On October 29 2010 22:00 Djin)ftw( wrote: jaedong only really spams early game from what i seen on vods. also his apm drops after the early stages to low 300s, so i dont think he is that much of a spammer. nada on the other hand spams ALL game =owhat replay did u watch? Oo i cant remember any rep of flash or bisu where they were spamming. Then again, i didnt have many reps of them. t.t But they used to have like 25% redundancy which is really low. But Jaedong is a spammer, no doubt about it. Like Nada and probably Julyzerg too, these 400 APM dont mean he is playing with 300 EAPM. Afair all 3 of them had pretty much the same EAPM as everyone else at that time | ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On October 29 2010 16:50 Microlisk wrote: Yeah unfortunately its the only one that does EAPM as bwchart only does full apm .BWHF Agent also has EAPM feature. It shows both APM and EAPM on the same chart. | ||
|
Armathai
1023 Posts
On October 29 2010 23:13 Dakota_Fanning wrote: BWHF Agent also has EAPM feature. It shows both APM and EAPM on the same chart. True, but so does bwrepinfo, no idea what the other person was talking about :p | ||
|
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
On October 29 2010 21:32 Armathai wrote: Also Flash vs JD comes out like 20-30% redundancy, but given I'd say the program has a 10% error margin they're fine? That's too small of a sample size to be deemed a general trend. My sample size is about 100 reps. Much more reliable of an idea of what's really going on. I think it has at least a 10% margin, maybe more. On October 29 2010 22:00 Djin)ftw( wrote: what replay did u watch? Oo i cant remember any rep of flash or bisu where they were spamming. Then again, i didnt have many reps of them. t.t But they used to have like 25% redundancy which is really low. I have many many reps of both. FlaSh varies between 25-40% redundancy. (higher-percent rep examples are FlaSh vs 815, FlaSh vs Tempest)ls(, and FlaSh vs Sea.GuemChi). Bisu also varies greatly between 25-40% (high-percent rep examples are Bisu vs SangHo, Bisu vs Hyuk game 2, Bisu vs Leta). Jaedong reps turn up the same results. I'm not sure if you guys just don't have a large samples size or something but I'm running off around 100 sample pro-reps. I just can't believe they're like 40% spam, it all seems necessary. On October 29 2010 22:00 Djin)ftw( wrote:But Jaedong is a spammer, no doubt about it. Like Nada and probably Julyzerg too, these 400 APM dont mean he is playing with 300 EAPM. Afair all 3 of them had pretty much the same EAPM as everyone else at that time Look at all the top progamers. During the middle of battles, they're usually locked in around 300EAPM with spikes as high as 370EAPM at times in 1 decisive moment. | ||
|
OPSavioR
Sweden1465 Posts
| ||
|
WhuazGoodJaggah
Lesotho777 Posts
select 5 select 1234,5678,9012 (3 larva IDs) morph lings those 2 selects are looked at as 1 unnecessary select, select without subsequent order or something like this. I once wrote a post in a thread regaring ret's eapm where he asked why he has so much spam. There should be a better explanation of the eapm problems. | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On April 01 2010 00:31 AmstAff wrote: WOW thats a good reason to bump this thread again, a 5 years old thread. seriously WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU? This bump reminded me how much of a dick this dude used to be | ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
| ||
|
zimp
Hungary955 Posts
On January 09 2016 22:42 LemOn wrote: is there any way I can downlaoad this now or other way to measure eapm in BW? the dl links are mostly dead https://www.sendspace.com/file/6ehgz2 i also have a bwrepinfow.dat file but i don't know what is dat and btw the download links work fine on the site. | ||
|
TelecoM
United States10696 Posts
| ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
After 6 years of inactivity my EAPM is still around 120, thank you very much for upload. Now where's the best place to get replays these days? Can't see the section on TL anymore | ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2609 Posts
Is the best ressource for replays nowadays | ||
| ||
