|
On October 19 2010 11:53 Murderotica wrote:
Maybe people should just be assholes and remind him every time they see him about the mistake he made a year ago and that even the not-so-forgiving TL community has forgotten about since then. TT1 used to be a hacker, Testie used to be a hacker, they were still allowed in major tournaments after they cleared their name. But Clazz isn't allowed to play Shark because he is so high and mighty, better than TL and other gaming organizations? Please.
Clazz never said "u mad," he said "I used to hack" and "I'm back on TL." Uhhh... So basically what he is trying to say is, is that he admits he used to hack and the community has accepted him again. Otherwise, Crunchums wouldn't let him play, like I said. If Crunchums doesn't care, then why do you have the right to be assholes about it? You don't. If you didn't want to play vs. former hackers you shouldn't have joined a league that allowed them in, sorry that CBW doesn't suit your interests, glhf.
My question is, why do you care?
It's his choice, his life, he doesn't want to play him then he doesn't want to. Why are you so upset about it? It's not him who should "live with former hackers", it's you who should deal with the fact that people like him won't play you for that reason. You're the one getting the win anyway. He only posted the reasons why he wouldn't play, so stop hanging on his balls, get over it and carry on with your life.
|
On September 13 2010 09:54 Crunchums wrote:Hey, time to play some Collegiate Broodwar! This is the first season and my first time running anything like this so hopefully there won't be too many bumps in the road and we can all just play some games and have some fun 
Friendly reminder from the OP.
|
On October 19 2010 12:04 Chaos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 13 2010 09:54 Crunchums wrote:Hey, time to play some Collegiate Broodwar! This is the first season and my first time running anything like this so hopefully there won't be too many bumps in the road and we can all just play some games and have some fun Friendly reminder from the OP.
Sadly, this is all I wanted to do tonight, like I said, had an amazing time with the last team we played and my friends, and that's the point I wanted to make, just don't be BM, be NICE. No point in justifying the BM, people should just be nice when it comes to games for fun.
Thank you though Chaos for putting this back together.
|
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On October 19 2010 12:00 Sawtf wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2010 11:53 Murderotica wrote:
Maybe people should just be assholes and remind him every time they see him about the mistake he made a year ago and that even the not-so-forgiving TL community has forgotten about since then. TT1 used to be a hacker, Testie used to be a hacker, they were still allowed in major tournaments after they cleared their name. But Clazz isn't allowed to play Shark because he is so high and mighty, better than TL and other gaming organizations? Please.
Clazz never said "u mad," he said "I used to hack" and "I'm back on TL." Uhhh... So basically what he is trying to say is, is that he admits he used to hack and the community has accepted him again. Otherwise, Crunchums wouldn't let him play, like I said. If Crunchums doesn't care, then why do you have the right to be assholes about it? You don't. If you didn't want to play vs. former hackers you shouldn't have joined a league that allowed them in, sorry that CBW doesn't suit your interests, glhf. My question is, why do you care? It's his choice, his life, he doesn't want to play him then he doesn't want to. Why are you so upset about it? It's not him who should "live with former hackers", it's you who should deal with the fact that people like him won't play you for that reason. You're the one getting the win anyway. He only posted the reasons why he wouldn't play, so stop hanging on his balls, get over it and carry on with your life.
I care because your friend talks shit, pretends like he didn't, then posts a whiny complaint on this thread when we responded to his bullshit. End of story. If he didn't post here, no one would have had to talk about his retarded standards. But, he had to feel righteous, and he had to stir shit up here, and this is where we are. You think we were going to post on this thread about how one of you guys acts like a little girl? All we do is post results. Your friend just posted ignorant shit, saying that his team didn't play when they did, etc. Just wanted to make sure your friend didn't get the satisfaction.
|
On October 19 2010 12:10 Murderotica wrote:
I care because your friend talks shit, pretends like he didn't, then posts a whiny complaint on this thread when we responded to his bullshit. End of story. If he didn't post here, no one would have had to talk about his retarded standards. But, he had to feel righteous, and he had to stir shit up here, and this is where we are. You think we were going to post on this thread about how one of you guys acts like a little girl? All we do is post results. Your friend just posted ignorant shit, saying that his team didn't play when they did, etc. Just wanted to make sure your friend didn't get the satisfaction.
He posted while we were playing, because he assumed we wouldn't play. I already said the reasons why I played, everyone here cares a lot more about the game than I do. The same could be said of Garash.
So here, let's end this now.
Shark said he didn't have fun tonight because of we know what happened.
He said that our team didn't play cause he thought we wouldn't, he was wrong.
You pointed it out.
The thread turned like kindergarten.
Don't know if that's what you wanted, but there's nothing more to say to it.
If you wanna keep argue, fine, but I won't be there. Going for real this time.
Goodnight
|
|
|
I think this is ridiculous. You know, I give some credit to PA. Penn State's whole argument in the past few pages was WAY WAY WAY more justified than whatever CEM has going on here. So, you know what, Penn State -- I like you guys again (aside from ilovezil). CEM has just topped you guys and claimed the award for the most stubborn, illogical, insensible group of all time. Sorry, I shouldn't say group. Sawtf was fine. And then the third guy didn't say a word, so I can't say anything about him. But Sharkified... Hah.
Okay, so I read everything, I understand both sides to this, but let me start off with this, which is the truth and the WHOLE truth. You know why my story will be the WHOLE truth (even though there are screenshots), because as everyone knows, I don't care to say it like it is.
Here is how everything went:
First, starting off with the dialogue between myself and Sharkified in order to set up the match:
Original Message From Sharkified:
The earlier, the better for us, however if you guys can only make it for 9pm then we will make it 9pm
-----------------------------------------
Original Message From ammeL:
9pm?
-----------------------------------------
Original Message From Sharkified:
COuld it be earlier ? Say 8 pm ? Channel op CBW
-----------------------------------------
Original Message From ammeL:
Let's just reschedule it for tomorrow?? Monday. 10pm?
-----------------------------------------
Original Message From Sharkified:
CEM vs Rutgers was suppose to take place today.
What are we going to do ? :/
Thanks.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Okay, so as everyone can see -- the match was schedule for 9pm, yes? All good and well. All mannered in the PM, yes? Okay, good.
Next, my team and I show up in OP CBW on ICCUP promptly at 9pm. At this time, Sawtf is there and we begin to just have some friendly conversation, as we wait for the rest of the CEM team. Upon this "friendly" conversation, I was interested in knowing more about Canadian schooling and how their computer science program works in Canada. Sawtf can attest to this. Anyhow, upon this, I asked Sawtf "are you sure your team is coming at 9pm??" He replied with "yeah." And you know why I asked this to Sawtf? Because I had PMd Sharkified THREE more times after what is shown above in the original PM chain and I got NO response. So how do I even know if the message went across? (I guess I could assume this because Sawtf was here, but I'm not one to make assumptions). At any rate, I guess in an act of exageration I had told Sawtf "I sent Sharkified 3 more PMs and he hasn't even responded, and it's been like 3 days." Okay, yeah. It was 2 PMs from today, and 1 PM from yesterday. Sorry, I exagerated. But that's just normal frame of speech. (this is the part where things start to "BM," according to CEM).
These are the things that I said in the following 3 PMs I sent to Sharkified:
Most recent PM: okay. my team is all ready. where are you guys? - 10/19/10 09:44
Second most recent PM: So, finalizations:
9pm est, iccup channel op CBW.
we have 3players (maybe 4). we'll announce matches/maps as we go along. - 10/19/10 04:16
Oldest PM: okay, 9pm works. -10/18/10 07:57
(the times are listed here, and since Sharkified believes no one since he is the only one who will NEVER sin, and you think I'm a liar, then go ask an admin -- though, there's nothing to lie about because these same PMs are in your damn inbox which you clearly don't look at. I mean come on, I'm the only person who's probably ever contacted beside the CEM team and your mother. One would imagine that you'd jump with joy when you saw Three unread PMs in your inbox).
So, as the nice conversation between Sawtf and I continues, Sharkified finally enters. And as it is shown, this is when the screenshots actually pick up. Sharkified enters the room with "what the hell" and starts to badger me about the whole '3 days' dilemma. I guess Sawtf must have told Sharkified that I said I PMd him 3 days ago? And with this, Sharkified comes on and just starts acting like I committed some sort of sin because I said 3 days? Clearly, I did not mean THREE DAYS in a literal sense. I just meant that I had PM'd him 3 times and I got no response for quite some time. That was all I meant by that, and I'm sorry, but if you take "three days" litearlly, you must lack sensibility and common sense (I'm sorry, this is an assumption, I guess I'm contradicting myself by saying this).
At this point, I told Sharkified he was giving me an attitude. And he was. How would you just barge in there and start speaking to me in a tone that is revealed in the texts? So, I told him to back off and I took him off his high horse. Did I hurt your feelings? As a youngster, Sharkified grew older and to the man he is today without experiencing any sort of laughs, jokes, humor, or sociability. Thus, he has no idea what sarcasm or exageration in any form is. I could tell him "damn, my grandma macros better than you!" and he'd probably go into some massive rage, and be like "WHAT THE HELL? YOU DARE TO SAY YOUR GRANDMA CAN MACRO BETTER THAN A FIT 20 YEAR OLD?!"
Yeah, Sharkified. You're the man.
Anyways, aside from this, we continue on and things basically get out of hand at this point (not RU, but CEM). I mean, come on, he can't take a simple joke, I said "canadians are weird" and he automatically feels offended. Maybe the highshcool you went to was full of perfect human beings such as yourself, but I guess you haven't experience the real world. If someone calls you "weird" you automatically want to quit life? So I guess if I call you a moron, you'll go rob a bank, kill 3 people, and then kill yourself too? Pathetic. I mean Canadians have the worst impression of Americans as it is. Anyhow, I replied to Sharkified by saying "you can call american's fat. I won't feel offended." And that was just a general speech telling him that, if he said something to me, I wouldn't have gone buck-wild and rage off like IdrA after losing to G5 and saying "you know how make carriers. that's a nice skill." Are you kidding me?
Anyhow, so after that, Sharkified had ANOTHER reason not to play us. This lead to the whole thing about Clazz = Clazziaquai. He said "oh I'm not playnig an ex-hacker." Okay. So does this mean Sharkified is disgusted by Testie? HIS OWN CANADIAN BLOOD. The best SC player Canada has ever had? (okay, fine, Garmito but let's not get into that right now). Testie was once a convicted hacker and then he proved himself and made it to the top. So, clazz can't do that? Clazz can't just be a non-hacker now (which he is). I mean, people thought this about LastShadow, too. No one says that to LS anymore. "Hey LS, I know you're A-, but you know what? I can't play you because you only got A- on iccup." Nice logic, Sharkified. You're amazing. Your logic is sound, your sense is fantastic, and you're just a great person, aren't you? No other team has EVER had a problem playing against Clazz. Clazz doesn't even ever say anyting. If anyone on our team is BM, it's ME. I admit that. Next would be Murderotica. But clazz is just a nice guy, minds his business, plays his game, says gg, and logs off. Yet, you really had to bring him into this by indirectly calling him a hacker? Sawtf made an interesting point earlier above about personal choice and how no one hires an ex-prisoner. This is true. BUT, what you're overlooking, since you are all such GREAT people, especially Sharkified. SECOND CHANCES ANYONE?! (plus, prisoners usually kill human beings. I don't think hacking has anything to do with an example as extreme as an ex-prisoner). But since Sharkified is the Chuck Norris of everything with his C- ladder rank who defies any sort of exageration by all means (back to the 3 day example), he would be willing to give a nice guy such as Clazz a second chance, yes? NO. HE WILL NOT. Sharkified stands STRONG by his princples!!! Crunchums runs this league. CMU -- we played them. That's the CBW coordinators team. We acted the same way. We had ZERO problems. Plus, you think crunchums would let an "ex-hacker" play if he was still a hacker? Be logical. Don't use stupid excuses to get out a match that you just didn't want to play. That's the same as you saying "mom, I'm sick, I can't go to school" as you put the lamp on your head to get your temperature up.
I like that in a man (ok, this is getting weird!!!) Sorry, I had to make it a little lighter in the mood, things are getting to serious for my liking. Not only for my liking, but for Rutger's liking. We're a nice group of kids, we joke around, and yeah, we're probably cocky. But if you meet us in real life, we have fun. Sorry that CEM took such offense to all of this, but no other team in the past has ever gotten this ridiuclousy stupid over such a trivial matter (aside from the Penn State fiasco, but ilovezil was just a moron -- sorry, don't want to get in the past, but I just felt like insulting ilovezil).
There after, Sharkified logs off like a little girl running to his Mommy because a few "bullies" at the park didn't let him go down the slide. BOO HOO. Cry me a river. I think your tears could create a river longer than the Nile, you big baby.
Then, he leaves. We play our matches. No one talks. Drama is over. Rutgers won 2-0. Match over. Sharkified is a fool. That is all.
Case closed.
NEXT MATCH?
LET'S HAVE SOME FUNNNNNNNNNNN.
P.S.
Did I mention that Sharkified is a great guy? Did I also mention that Sharkified does not believe in second chances? Did I also mention that Sharkified has no clue what exageration is? Did I mention that Sharkified will make an excellent father some day? Sharkified for President! (or Prime Minister since he's a weird Canadian).
|
nice fucking essay u turbovirgin kishan <3
|
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On October 19 2010 12:43 YiukeDukem wrote:
nice fucking essay u turbovirgin kishan <3
Don't throw stones in a glass house man, we've all seen your face
|
Hey, make sure you wash the shorts I gave to you and give them back to me promptly, serf.
|
On October 19 2010 12:44 Murderotica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2010 12:43 YiukeDukem wrote:
nice fucking essay u turbovirgin kishan <3 Don't throw stones in a glass house man, we've all seen your face
That, too. You ghastly ghoul, Seth.
At any rate, let's not attack each other. We have an enemy at hand!
|
Man you'd think that CBW would be the least likely place for a drama outlet..
Screw an all-stars match, it's gonna be Guild of GM Players vs Rutgers
>_>
|
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On October 19 2010 12:50 Snipinpanda wrote:
Man you'd think that CBW would be the least likely place for a drama outlet..
Screw an all-stars match, it's gonna be Guild of GM Players vs Rutgers
>_>
Let's do it
|
San Antonio > GT 3-1
Also, from the 10/9 matchup I'm having trouble contacting the NIU coordinator. We could never find a time that both of our teams could play, but he's stopped returning my PMs.
|
i cant believe i lost that game. fuck i hate SCVs. at least i beat him in the unofficial rematch 
|
On October 19 2010 13:46 Ideas wrote:i cant believe i lost that game. fuck i hate SCVs. at least i beat him in the unofficial rematch
close game D: my macro has been slipping a lott since i stopped playing and playing on my laptop screen for the first time didn't help, but yea lets practice together sometime maybee
|
I was so mad about my match ~_~. After I successfully busted the nat in the beginning I just suicided all my marines and just stopped macroing wtf. Had like 3k mins at the end.
/sigh
|
On October 19 2010 14:40 Tyrio wrote:
I was so mad about my match ~_~. After I successfully busted the nat in the beginning I just suicided all my marines and just stopped macroing wtf. Had like 3k mins at the end.
/sigh
it's hard to macro bad when you have fucking 6 rax too omg
|
ammel, I'm glad to see you "moved on with your life" by finding prickish ways to insult me.
Glad to know I have a fan.
|
On October 19 2010 15:00 Ideas wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2010 14:40 Tyrio wrote:
I was so mad about my match ~_~. After I successfully busted the nat in the beginning I just suicided all my marines and just stopped macroing wtf. Had like 3k mins at the end.
/sigh it's hard to macro bad when you have fucking 6 rax too omg
6 rax barely makes a dent when you macro. Marines are so fucking fragile and they make so fast wtf.
Rines are so bad I dunno why anyone goes fucking bio. fffff
~_~
Play me more Ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
