EPTThat holds true? Because the "Rules & Tips" thingie at the first post has not changed I think.
Thanks in advance.
[Fantasy] PL 09-10 R1 Discussion - Page 19
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
That holds true? Because the "Rules & Tips" thingie at the first post has not changed I think. Thanks in advance. | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
| ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
Time to undo some trade lol :D | ||
semioldguy
United States7488 Posts
| ||
|
bugus
Romania133 Posts
On October 16 2009 22:34 Musoeun wrote: 1) Who to ditch from anti, Lomo or Sea? They're likely to both win. I can get better "value" for Lomo, but Sea's far more likely to pull ace duty. this is my situation also, finally I decided to keep them both, hoping they lose. What did you do? | ||
|
Ideas
United States8055 Posts
| ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5679 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
DrTJEckleburg
United States1080 Posts
On a side note: I made two trades this week and it only lists my trade tax as minus one, shouldn't it be minus two? | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
On October 17 2009 00:30 Salteador Neo wrote: So I read somebody around said the rules would change. Like no point for lineup and -2 for lose instead of -1, so the anti team can also gain you points. That holds true? Because the "Rules & Tips" thingie at the first post has not changed I think. Thanks in advance. Not til next round. | ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On October 17 2009 07:25 DrTJEckleburg wrote: I'm doing shitty as hell, no surprise, haha! On a side note: I made two trades this week and it only lists my trade tax as minus one, shouldn't it be minus two? Team trades don't incur a -1 trade tax. | ||
|
BachHo
United States170 Posts
On October 17 2009 08:02 Abydos1 wrote: Team trades don't incur a -1 trade tax. Oh, really... -evil laugh- | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17187 Posts
I mean, what if the player that you have on your team gets injured/retires mid-season or otherwise disappears from the rosters? Should you be able to trade your captain in such case? Should you get 1 "free" trade (ie. no -1 trade tax to exchange the current player)? Should you get 1 more trade/week to replace this player? Edit: And likewise be forced to trade him if he's on your AT. | ||
|
lazz
Australia3119 Posts
On October 17 2009 09:22 Manit0u wrote: Just a random thought: Shouldn't there be an exception added to trading? I mean, what if the player that you have on your team gets injured/retires mid-season or otherwise disappears from the rosters? Should you be able to trade your captain in such case? Should you get 1 "free" trade (ie. no -1 trade tax to exchange the current player)? Should you get 1 more trade/week to replace this player? Edit: And likewise be forced to trade him if he's on your AT. i think this would be a good idea out of curiosity, what did they do with backho when he injured his back? i wasnt playing FPL during that time so I don't know On October 16 2009 22:56 fusionsdf wrote: Do that and you will always be trading down. If bogus loses both games (congratulations, you just gained no points) and yarnc wins his, I doubt you will still be able to make that trade at any time in the future. Yarnc is likely to generate far more points over this season than bogus. Any time that happens, you are trading up, and you should trade up whenever you can. Bisu may only have one lineup appearance, but it would be beyond stupid to trade him for gorush (2 appearances). Look at who will generate more points over the season and trade up when you have the opportunity. Yes of course what I said isn't a hard and fast rule - it's just something to keep in mind when making trades. I would never trade bisu for gorush - I usually trade for people within a close trade value. And you have to take risks if you want to finish high in FPL. every week I trade downwards - that is, if I have a player not playing twice, or not playing in every game that his time is playing - i WILL trade him, if possible. if there's no good trades within a certain range of his trade value then I won't though. Same with anti team. if someone on my anti team is playing I trade him away, no exceptions. this would change with the new rules proposed for next season though. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36370 Posts
On October 17 2009 09:22 Manit0u wrote: Just a random thought: Shouldn't there be an exception added to trading? I mean, what if the player that you have on your team gets injured/retires mid-season or otherwise disappears from the rosters? Should you be able to trade your captain in such case? Should you get 1 "free" trade (ie. no -1 trade tax to exchange the current player)? Should you get 1 more trade/week to replace this player? Edit: And likewise be forced to trade him if he's on your AT. There are very very few instances of someone retiring midseason who actually contributes to proleague. Keke retired and he's on two teams. It doesn't matter if he retires because he didn't play anyway. I really doubt you are going to make your captain someone who is about to retire, it's pretty rare, and unnecessarily complex to create such an option because it like never happens. | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
On October 17 2009 01:56 bugus wrote: this is my situation also, finally I decided to keep them both, hoping they lose. What did you do? Currently, I decided to keep Sea for at least this week and trade Lomo for Guemchi - I'm about 80% certain Lomo will beat MVP and OZ will win even if he doesn't. I'm predicting Lomo would get me -4, or at least another -1 which would mean I come out even this week, and with Lomo more likely to win and/or see games in the future I'm ahead. Of course if Stars win then I'm "screwed" this week... but I'm only out a total of two points, which I'm willing to risk. Sea is still a risk - but when the worst players I can trade him for are Violet, Stork, or RorO (on a hot streak), I can't justify any trades, especially the way Hyuk's been playing. Hopefully it won't bite me in the ass. On October 17 2009 10:52 Hot_Bid wrote: There are very very few instances of someone retiring midseason who actually contributes to proleague. Keke retired and he's on two teams. It doesn't matter if he retires because he didn't play anyway. I really doubt you are going to make your captain someone who is about to retire, it's pretty rare, and unnecessarily complex to create such an option because it like never happens. In keke's defence, he did play a reasonable amount last season up till the last round or so (splitting time with Shine behind RorO). But the no-shows at offlines were huge big red floating asterisk in the sky saying "don't pick this guy, don't pick this guy". GGPlay of course retired before the season, but he was barely playing - I'd also keep an eye on Daezang, he's actually not playing bad for coming from ACE but I don't know how long that'll last. | ||
|
Dark_Storm
Korea (South)5 Posts
| ||
|
chongu
Malaysia2579 Posts
 Mind and  RorO!!! wow, didn't expect -8 coming from both of them : ( my anti-team is doomed anyways | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
| ||
| ||
