EPTSucks because Princeton's schedule is so out of sync with everyone else -_- mid Jan = finals for us.
[CSL+] News and Announcement - Page 41
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
hazelynut
United States2197 Posts
Sucks because Princeton's schedule is so out of sync with everyone else -_- mid Jan = finals for us. | ||
|
JiYan
United States3668 Posts
| ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4054 Posts
On November 18 2009 17:22 JiYan wrote: if we are delaying playoffs until january, would this mean likely 2 CSL seasons per school year? or is that not even confirmed yet? that sounds about right, yes | ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
Talking about who plays who in Ro8 - only the Ro16 has been decided. | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
fucked up. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
| ||
|
Phelix
1931 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Note: Binghamton has no P in it. I'm tired of seeing the mistake in the posts. | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On November 19 2009 00:42 mOnion wrote: so arizona advances even though rice has more set wins? fucked up. how is that fucked up? Arizona beat Rice. it's all about who wins vs who, set wins are pretty meaningless. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On November 19 2009 00:59 Phelix wrote: Hypothetical Individual CSL, I assume this is the birdie message of 4 individual wins? Looks like I'm going to have to try to get that this week. + Show Spoiler + Note: Binghamton has no P in it. I'm tired of seeing the mistake in the posts. I do it just to spite you before our match against you (: | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On November 19 2009 01:00 Xeris wrote: how is that fucked up? Arizona beat Rice. it's all about who wins vs who, set wins are pretty meaningless. What if there are 3 teams tied, and they beat each other in a circular fashion? Division 3-way finals? | ||
|
moriya
United States54 Posts
Study the rules guys. On November 19 2009 01:03 fanatacist wrote: What if there are 3 teams tied, and they beat each other in a circular fashion? Division 3-way finals? | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On November 19 2009 03:02 randomKo_Orean wrote: why are there teams with 8+ people but started forfeiting every match? WTF? who? | ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On November 19 2009 00:47 fanatacist wrote: So hypothetically speaking, can Clazz and I participate in the hypothetical individual CSL (the one where you need 4 wins in CSL+ regular season) if we both win in our match against Binghampton? What hypothetical individual CSL? ^^ shhh everything's a surprise  | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On November 19 2009 01:00 Xeris wrote: how is that fucked up? Arizona beat Rice. it's all about who wins vs who, set wins are pretty meaningless. are you for reals? this is pretty dumb. in a real sport, just because you lose to a team doesnt make that team better than you. if rice has a better record, albeit losing to arizona, it shows theyre a better team and therefore should go to playoffs. not because of some fluke win arizona pulled. | ||
|
hazelynut
United States2197 Posts
the only way for rice to advance would have been to collude with UTexas, making it so that UT threw the match into a 3 way tie in the division. that screams illegal, unsportsmanlike play that we don't endorse, so while we apologize that playoff rules weren't publicized visibly enough, your argument is moot. rice losing to asu means asu advances - which is the standard system of round robin. | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On November 19 2009 03:49 hazelynut wrote: this system is actually pretty standard in round robin (something that xeris fully knew when he wrote up playoff rules, and also something that dennis himself told me last night after discussing it with the rice team). the only way for rice to advance would have been to collude with UTexas, making it so that UT threw the match into a 3 way tie in the division. that screams illegal, unsportsmanlike play that we don't endorse, so while we apologize that playoff rules weren't publicized visibly enough, your argument is moot. rice losing to asu means asu advances - which is the standard system of round robin. mkay | ||
|
Albireo
United States43 Posts
On November 19 2009 02:50 moriya wrote: Only in that case set wins is considered. Otherwise just a head-to-head comparison. Study the rules guys. It's not quite set wins, but rather "points", which is effectively set differential in games won. From the post in the CSL forums: Scenario B: Team A, B, and C are both 3-3 during the season (3 way tie for 2nd). - In this case we will look at points (I.E, 3-0 win = 3 points, 3-1 win = 2 points, 3-2 win = 1 point, loss = 0 points). - The team with the most points will take the tiebreak | ||
| ||
